Real world challenges and barriers for positive airway therapy use in acute ischemic stroke patients

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Sleep and Breathing Pub Date : 2024-09-16 DOI:10.1007/s11325-024-03161-7
Maeve Pascoe, Madeleine M Grigg-Damberger, Harneet Walia, Noah Andrews, Lu Wang, James Bena, Irene Katzan, Ken Uchino, Nancy Foldvary-Schaefer
{"title":"Real world challenges and barriers for positive airway therapy use in acute ischemic stroke patients","authors":"Maeve Pascoe, Madeleine M Grigg-Damberger, Harneet Walia, Noah Andrews, Lu Wang, James Bena, Irene Katzan, Ken Uchino, Nancy Foldvary-Schaefer","doi":"10.1007/s11325-024-03161-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Purpose</h3><p>Untreated obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. However, diagnosing and treating OSA in AIS is challenging. We aimed to determine the feasibility of portable monitoring (PM) for diagnosis and positive airway pressure therapy for treatment of OSA in an inpatient stroke population.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>We recruited inpatients with AIS from Cleveland Clinic. Those who consented underwent PM; participants with a respiratory event index (REI) ≥ 10 were offered auto-titrating positive airway pressure therapy (APAP). Ease-of-use questionnaires were completed. We summarized categorical variables using n(%) and continuous variables using mean ± SD or median [IQR].</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>27 participants (age 59.8 ± 11.8, 51.9% female, 51.9% Black, BMI 33.4 ± 8.5) enrolled. The study ended early due to Medicare contracting that forced most patients to complete stroke rehabilitation outside the Cleveland Clinic health system. 59.3% had large vessel occlusions and 53.8% had moderate/severe disability (Modified Rankin score ≥ 2). PM was attempted in 21 participants, successful in 18. Nurses and patients rated the PM device as highly easy to use. 13 of 18 (72%) patients who had an REI ≥ 10 consented to APAP titration, but only eight (61.5%) of those 13 used APAP for more than one night, and only five (27.8%) used APAP up to 90 days with data captured for only one participant. Five required troubleshooting at titration, and only one had adherent APAP usage by objective assessment after discharge.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>This study demonstrates the real-world challenges of assessing and treating OSA in an AIS population, highlighting the necessity for further research into timely and feasible screening and treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":21862,"journal":{"name":"Sleep and Breathing","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sleep and Breathing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11325-024-03161-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Untreated obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. However, diagnosing and treating OSA in AIS is challenging. We aimed to determine the feasibility of portable monitoring (PM) for diagnosis and positive airway pressure therapy for treatment of OSA in an inpatient stroke population.

Methods

We recruited inpatients with AIS from Cleveland Clinic. Those who consented underwent PM; participants with a respiratory event index (REI) ≥ 10 were offered auto-titrating positive airway pressure therapy (APAP). Ease-of-use questionnaires were completed. We summarized categorical variables using n(%) and continuous variables using mean ± SD or median [IQR].

Results

27 participants (age 59.8 ± 11.8, 51.9% female, 51.9% Black, BMI 33.4 ± 8.5) enrolled. The study ended early due to Medicare contracting that forced most patients to complete stroke rehabilitation outside the Cleveland Clinic health system. 59.3% had large vessel occlusions and 53.8% had moderate/severe disability (Modified Rankin score ≥ 2). PM was attempted in 21 participants, successful in 18. Nurses and patients rated the PM device as highly easy to use. 13 of 18 (72%) patients who had an REI ≥ 10 consented to APAP titration, but only eight (61.5%) of those 13 used APAP for more than one night, and only five (27.8%) used APAP up to 90 days with data captured for only one participant. Five required troubleshooting at titration, and only one had adherent APAP usage by objective assessment after discharge.

Conclusions

This study demonstrates the real-world challenges of assessing and treating OSA in an AIS population, highlighting the necessity for further research into timely and feasible screening and treatment.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在急性缺血性脑卒中患者中使用正压通气疗法的现实挑战和障碍
目的 急性缺血性卒中(AIS)患者的阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)未经治疗会增加发病率和死亡率。然而,诊断和治疗 AIS 中的 OSA 具有挑战性。我们的目的是确定便携式监测(PM)诊断和气道正压疗法治疗中风住院患者 OSA 的可行性。我们从克利夫兰诊所招募了患有 AIS 的住院病人,同意接受正压治疗的病人接受了正压治疗;呼吸事件指数 (REI) ≥ 10 的病人接受了自动调整气道正压疗法 (APAP)。填写了易用性调查问卷。结果27名参与者(年龄59.8 ± 11.8,女性51.9%,黑人51.9%,体重指数33.4 ± 8.5)参加了研究。由于医疗保险合同的签订,大多数患者不得不在克利夫兰诊所医疗系统之外完成中风康复治疗,因此研究提前结束。59.3%的患者有大血管闭塞,53.8%的患者有中度/重度残疾(改良Rankin评分≥2)。21 名参与者尝试了 PM,18 人成功。护士和患者都认为 PM 设备非常易于使用。18 位 REI ≥ 10 的患者中有 13 位(72%)同意使用 APAP 滴定,但这 13 位患者中只有 8 位(61.5%)使用 APAP 超过一个晚上,只有 5 位(27.8%)使用 APAP 长达 90 天,只有一位参与者的数据被采集。五人在滴定时需要排除故障,只有一人在出院后通过客观评估坚持使用 APAP。结论这项研究表明了在 AIS 群体中评估和治疗 OSA 的现实挑战,强调了进一步研究及时可行的筛查和治疗的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sleep and Breathing
Sleep and Breathing 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
4.00%
发文量
222
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal Sleep and Breathing aims to reflect the state of the art in the international science and practice of sleep medicine. The journal is based on the recognition that management of sleep disorders requires a multi-disciplinary approach and diverse perspectives. The initial focus of Sleep and Breathing is on timely and original studies that collect, intervene, or otherwise inform all clinicians and scientists in medicine, dentistry and oral surgery, otolaryngology, and epidemiology on the management of the upper airway during sleep. Furthermore, Sleep and Breathing endeavors to bring readers cutting edge information about all evolving aspects of common sleep disorders or disruptions, such as insomnia and shift work. The journal includes not only patient studies, but also studies that emphasize the principles of physiology and pathophysiology or illustrate potentially novel approaches to diagnosis and treatment. In addition, the journal features articles that describe patient-oriented and cost-benefit health outcomes research. Thus, with peer review by an international Editorial Board and prompt English-language publication, Sleep and Breathing provides rapid dissemination of clinical and clinically related scientific information. But it also does more: it is dedicated to making the most important developments in sleep disordered breathing easily accessible to clinicians who are treating sleep apnea by presenting well-chosen, well-written, and highly organized information that is useful for patient care.
期刊最新文献
Long-term mortality risk in obstructive sleep apnea: the critical role of oxygen desaturation index. Prevalence of poor sleep quality during menopause: a meta-analysis. The association between sleep quantity, insomnia and lung cancer risk - A systematic review and meta-analysis. Impact of snoring on the risk of stroke in patients with diabetes mellitus. Neuroticism affects nightmare distress through rumination.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1