Sarcopenia and sleep in individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Sleep and Breathing Pub Date : 2024-09-17 DOI:10.1007/s11325-024-03126-w
Daniele Dala Pola, Thaiuana Maia, Elis Moraes, Leticia Ogochi, Arthur Mesas, Fabio Pitta
{"title":"Sarcopenia and sleep in individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease","authors":"Daniele Dala Pola, Thaiuana Maia, Elis Moraes, Leticia Ogochi, Arthur Mesas, Fabio Pitta","doi":"10.1007/s11325-024-03126-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Objective</h3><p>To verify the relationship between sarcopenia and sleep in individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>Individuals with COPD were cross-sectionally assessed for lung function (spirometry), sleep (both subjectively [Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, PSQI] and objectively [Actiwatch sleep monitor]) and the presence of sarcopenia (handgrip strength by dynamometry). All tests were carried out in accordance with international standards.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Twenty-nine individuals with COPD were analyzed (16 women; 69 ± 7 years; BMI 27 ± 5 kg/m<sup>2</sup>; FEV<sub>1</sub> 59 ± 19% predicted). Upon division in groups according to the presence or absence of sarcopenia, individuals with sarcopenia (in comparison to those without sarcopenia) had shorter sleep time (81 [75–85] vs. 86 [81–90] %; <i>p</i> = 0.043), lower sleep efficiency (77 [69–83] vs. 85 [75–87] %; <i>p</i> = 0.038), longer time awake after sleep onset (92 [71–120] vs. 58 [47–83] minutes; <i>p</i> = 0.0012) and more marked sleep fragmentation, represented by a higher number of sleep blocks/night (46 [41–49] vs. 34 [26–48]; <i>p</i> = 0.018), higher number of awake blocks/night (45 [40–49] vs. 34 [26–48]; <i>p</i> = 0.018) and shorter duration of sleep blocks/night (9 [8–10] vs. 14 [8–58] minutes; <i>p</i> = 0.043). There was no statistical difference when comparing the PSQI variables between the groups. However, handgrip strength was negatively associated with PSQI components 2 [<i>R</i>= -0.51, <i>p</i> = 0.005] and 5 [<i>R</i>= -0.39, <i>p</i> = 0.037].</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>Individuals with COPD and sarcopenia (as measured by handgrip strength) have worse objectively measured sleep outcomes. This was not the case regarding a self-reported perception of worse sleep quality, although there was weak-to-moderate association between handgrip strength and subjective sleep.</p>","PeriodicalId":21862,"journal":{"name":"Sleep and Breathing","volume":"116 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sleep and Breathing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11325-024-03126-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To verify the relationship between sarcopenia and sleep in individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

Methods

Individuals with COPD were cross-sectionally assessed for lung function (spirometry), sleep (both subjectively [Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, PSQI] and objectively [Actiwatch sleep monitor]) and the presence of sarcopenia (handgrip strength by dynamometry). All tests were carried out in accordance with international standards.

Results

Twenty-nine individuals with COPD were analyzed (16 women; 69 ± 7 years; BMI 27 ± 5 kg/m2; FEV1 59 ± 19% predicted). Upon division in groups according to the presence or absence of sarcopenia, individuals with sarcopenia (in comparison to those without sarcopenia) had shorter sleep time (81 [75–85] vs. 86 [81–90] %; p = 0.043), lower sleep efficiency (77 [69–83] vs. 85 [75–87] %; p = 0.038), longer time awake after sleep onset (92 [71–120] vs. 58 [47–83] minutes; p = 0.0012) and more marked sleep fragmentation, represented by a higher number of sleep blocks/night (46 [41–49] vs. 34 [26–48]; p = 0.018), higher number of awake blocks/night (45 [40–49] vs. 34 [26–48]; p = 0.018) and shorter duration of sleep blocks/night (9 [8–10] vs. 14 [8–58] minutes; p = 0.043). There was no statistical difference when comparing the PSQI variables between the groups. However, handgrip strength was negatively associated with PSQI components 2 [R= -0.51, p = 0.005] and 5 [R= -0.39, p = 0.037].

Conclusion

Individuals with COPD and sarcopenia (as measured by handgrip strength) have worse objectively measured sleep outcomes. This was not the case regarding a self-reported perception of worse sleep quality, although there was weak-to-moderate association between handgrip strength and subjective sleep.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
慢性阻塞性肺病患者的 "肌肉疏松症 "和睡眠问题
方法 对患有慢性阻塞性肺病(COPD)的个体进行横断面肺功能(肺活量测定法)、睡眠(主观[匹兹堡睡眠质量指数,PSQI]和客观[Actiwatch 睡眠监测仪])和是否患有肌肉疏松症(通过测力法测定手握力)的评估。所有测试均按照国际标准进行。结果分析了 29 名慢性阻塞性肺病患者(16 名女性;69 ± 7 岁;体重指数 27 ± 5 kg/m2;预测 FEV1 59 ± 19%)。根据是否患有肌肉疏松症进行分组后发现,患有肌肉疏松症的人(与不患有肌肉疏松症的人)睡眠时间较短(81 [75-85] vs. 86 [81-90] %;p = 0.043),睡眠效率较低(77 [69-83] vs. 85 [75-87] %;p = 0.038),睡眠开始后清醒时间较长(92 [71-120] vs. 58 [47-83] 分钟;p = 0.038)。58[47-83]分钟;p = 0.0012)和更明显的睡眠片段化,表现为更高的睡眠阻滞数/晚(46 [41-49] vs. 34 [26-48];p = 0.018)、更高的清醒阻滞数/晚(45 [40-49] vs. 34 [26-48];p = 0.018)和更短的睡眠阻滞持续时间/晚(9 [8-10] vs. 14 [8-58] 分钟;p = 0.043)。两组之间的 PSQI 变量比较没有统计学差异。结论患有慢性阻塞性肺病和肌肉疏松症(以手握力为测量指标)的患者客观测量的睡眠结果较差。尽管手握力与主观睡眠之间存在微弱至中等程度的联系,但自我报告的睡眠质量较差情况并非如此。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sleep and Breathing
Sleep and Breathing 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
4.00%
发文量
222
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal Sleep and Breathing aims to reflect the state of the art in the international science and practice of sleep medicine. The journal is based on the recognition that management of sleep disorders requires a multi-disciplinary approach and diverse perspectives. The initial focus of Sleep and Breathing is on timely and original studies that collect, intervene, or otherwise inform all clinicians and scientists in medicine, dentistry and oral surgery, otolaryngology, and epidemiology on the management of the upper airway during sleep. Furthermore, Sleep and Breathing endeavors to bring readers cutting edge information about all evolving aspects of common sleep disorders or disruptions, such as insomnia and shift work. The journal includes not only patient studies, but also studies that emphasize the principles of physiology and pathophysiology or illustrate potentially novel approaches to diagnosis and treatment. In addition, the journal features articles that describe patient-oriented and cost-benefit health outcomes research. Thus, with peer review by an international Editorial Board and prompt English-language publication, Sleep and Breathing provides rapid dissemination of clinical and clinically related scientific information. But it also does more: it is dedicated to making the most important developments in sleep disordered breathing easily accessible to clinicians who are treating sleep apnea by presenting well-chosen, well-written, and highly organized information that is useful for patient care.
期刊最新文献
Long-term mortality risk in obstructive sleep apnea: the critical role of oxygen desaturation index. Prevalence of poor sleep quality during menopause: a meta-analysis. The association between sleep quantity, insomnia and lung cancer risk - A systematic review and meta-analysis. Impact of snoring on the risk of stroke in patients with diabetes mellitus. Neuroticism affects nightmare distress through rumination.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1