The effect of an educational video on the immediate insertion of postpartum contraceptive implants: A randomized controlled trial

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics Pub Date : 2024-09-18 DOI:10.1002/ijgo.15921
Nutruja Boontor, Srinaree Kaewrudee, Jen Sothornwit
{"title":"The effect of an educational video on the immediate insertion of postpartum contraceptive implants: A randomized controlled trial","authors":"Nutruja Boontor,&nbsp;Srinaree Kaewrudee,&nbsp;Jen Sothornwit","doi":"10.1002/ijgo.15921","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To assess the impact of an educational video on immediate postpartum contraceptive implant utilization.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This was a randomized controlled study conducted in a university hospital. Postpartum women aged over 18 years were recruited and divided into two groups: the intervention group, which viewed a 7-min educational video about contraceptive implants; and the control group, which did not. We evaluated the uptake of contraceptive implants immediately and during a 12-week period postpartum, in addition to the reasons for not selecting this method.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 202 participants were included in the study, 101 in each group. Viewing the educational video was associated with higher immediate postpartum contraceptive implant usage (22.77% vs 10.89%; relative risk [RR] 2.09, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.08–4.06). However, no significant difference was observed at the postpartum follow-up visit (29.9% vs 25.74%; RR 1.61, 95% CI 0.74–1.82). The primary reasons for not selecting contraceptive implants were concerns about potential side effects and discomfort associated with the insertion procedure.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The inclusion of an animated educational video significantly improved immediate postpartum contraceptive implant uptake, making it a potentially viable strategy in settings with high rates of loss to follow-up. However, further research into how to address patients' fears regarding the implant is required.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14164,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics","volume":"168 2","pages":"591-597"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ijgo.15921","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To assess the impact of an educational video on immediate postpartum contraceptive implant utilization.

Methods

This was a randomized controlled study conducted in a university hospital. Postpartum women aged over 18 years were recruited and divided into two groups: the intervention group, which viewed a 7-min educational video about contraceptive implants; and the control group, which did not. We evaluated the uptake of contraceptive implants immediately and during a 12-week period postpartum, in addition to the reasons for not selecting this method.

Results

A total of 202 participants were included in the study, 101 in each group. Viewing the educational video was associated with higher immediate postpartum contraceptive implant usage (22.77% vs 10.89%; relative risk [RR] 2.09, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.08–4.06). However, no significant difference was observed at the postpartum follow-up visit (29.9% vs 25.74%; RR 1.61, 95% CI 0.74–1.82). The primary reasons for not selecting contraceptive implants were concerns about potential side effects and discomfort associated with the insertion procedure.

Conclusion

The inclusion of an animated educational video significantly improved immediate postpartum contraceptive implant uptake, making it a potentially viable strategy in settings with high rates of loss to follow-up. However, further research into how to address patients' fears regarding the implant is required.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
教育视频对立即植入产后避孕植入物的影响:随机对照试验。
目的:评估教育视频对产后立即使用避孕皮下埋植剂的影响。方法:这是一项在大学医院进行的随机对照研究。我们招募了 18 岁以上的产后妇女,并将她们分为两组:干预组和对照组,前者观看了 7 分钟的避孕皮下埋植剂教育视频,后者则没有观看。我们评估了产后即刻和 12 周内采取皮下埋植避孕法的情况,以及不选择这种方法的原因。结果共有 202 人参加了研究,每组 101 人。观看教育视频与更高的产后立即使用避孕植入物率相关(22.77% vs 10.89%;相对风险 [RR] 2.09,95% 置信区间 [CI]1.08-4.06)。然而,在产后随访中未观察到明显差异(29.9% vs 25.74%;RR 1.61,95% CI 0.74-1.82)。不选择植入避孕药具的主要原因是担心潜在的副作用和植入过程中的不适。然而,如何消除患者对植入手术的恐惧还需要进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
2.60%
发文量
493
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics publishes articles on all aspects of basic and clinical research in the fields of obstetrics and gynecology and related subjects, with emphasis on matters of worldwide interest.
期刊最新文献
The association between epidural analgesia and perineal injury in primiparous women: A propensity score-matched cohort study. Risks of misuse and overuse of Kegel exercises in postpartum and postmenopausal urinary incontinence. Fluorescein colposcopy-A more specific diagnostic method for detection of high-grade cervical precancer lesions than acetic acid. Efficacy and safety of fractional microablative radiofrequency versus topical estriol in treating genitourinary syndrome of menopause: A pilot study. Oxytocin versus carbetocin for preventing postpartum hemorrhage in patients with polyhydramnios during cesarean delivery: A retrospective cohort study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1