Elishevah van Kooten, Adrian Brearley, Denton Ebel, Conel Alexander, Marina Gemma, Dominik Hezel
{"title":"Is there a genetic relationship between chondrules and matrix?","authors":"Elishevah van Kooten, Adrian Brearley, Denton Ebel, Conel Alexander, Marina Gemma, Dominik Hezel","doi":"arxiv-2409.08662","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Chondritic components such as chondrules and matrix are the key time capsules\nthat can help us understand the evolution and dynamics of the protoplanetary\ndisk from which the Solar System originated. Knowledge of where and how these\ncomponents formed and to what extent they were transported in the gaseous disk\nprovides major constraints to astrophysical models that investigate planet\nformation. Here, we explore whether chondrules and matrix are genetically\nrelated to each other and formed from single reservoirs per chondrite group or\nif every chondrite represents a unique proportion of components transported\nfrom a small number of formation reservoirs in the disk. These static versus\ndynamic disk interpretations of cosmochemical data have profound implications\nfor the accretion history of the planets in the Solar System. To fully\nunderstand the relationship between chondrules and matrix and their potential\ncomplementarity, we dive into the petrological nature and origin of matrix, the\nchemical and isotopic compositions of chondrules and matrix and evaluate these\ndata considering the effect of secondary alteration observed in chondrites and\nthe potential complexity of chondrule formation. Even though we, the authors,\nhave used different datasets and arrived at differing interpretations of\nchondrule-matrix relationships in the past, this review provides clarity on the\nexisting data and has given us new directions towards future research that can\nresolve the complementarity debate.","PeriodicalId":501270,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - PHYS - Geophysics","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - PHYS - Geophysics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.08662","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Chondritic components such as chondrules and matrix are the key time capsules
that can help us understand the evolution and dynamics of the protoplanetary
disk from which the Solar System originated. Knowledge of where and how these
components formed and to what extent they were transported in the gaseous disk
provides major constraints to astrophysical models that investigate planet
formation. Here, we explore whether chondrules and matrix are genetically
related to each other and formed from single reservoirs per chondrite group or
if every chondrite represents a unique proportion of components transported
from a small number of formation reservoirs in the disk. These static versus
dynamic disk interpretations of cosmochemical data have profound implications
for the accretion history of the planets in the Solar System. To fully
understand the relationship between chondrules and matrix and their potential
complementarity, we dive into the petrological nature and origin of matrix, the
chemical and isotopic compositions of chondrules and matrix and evaluate these
data considering the effect of secondary alteration observed in chondrites and
the potential complexity of chondrule formation. Even though we, the authors,
have used different datasets and arrived at differing interpretations of
chondrule-matrix relationships in the past, this review provides clarity on the
existing data and has given us new directions towards future research that can
resolve the complementarity debate.