Acute Effects of Steroids on Vocal Fold Epithelium Post‐injury in a Preclinical Model

Gary Gartling, Lea Sayce, Zachary Zimmerman, Alysha Slater, Lizzie Hary, Wenqing Yang, Michele Santacatterina, Bernard Rousseau, Ryan C. Branski
{"title":"Acute Effects of Steroids on Vocal Fold Epithelium Post‐injury in a Preclinical Model","authors":"Gary Gartling, Lea Sayce, Zachary Zimmerman, Alysha Slater, Lizzie Hary, Wenqing Yang, Michele Santacatterina, Bernard Rousseau, Ryan C. Branski","doi":"10.1002/lary.31729","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"IntroductionGlucocorticoids (GCs) are commonly prescribed for laryngeal indications due to their potent anti‐inflammatory properties. However, GCs effect on vocal fold (VF) epithelial morphology and barrier function following injury is overlooked and may be key to efficacy. In this study, the effects of GCs on epithelial morphology and barrier function were quantified in injured VFs. We seek to increase our understanding of biochemical processes underlying GC mechanisms to refine therapeutic strategies.MethodsMicroflap injury was induced in 65 rabbits. Seven days after injury, animals received bilateral 20 μL intracordal injections of saline, dexamethasone, methylprednisolone, or triamcinolone (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 15 per condition). Five rabbits in each condition were euthanized 1, 7, or 60 days following treatment. An additional five animals served as non‐injured/untreated controls. To quantify transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER), 1 mm epithelial biopsies were placed in an Ussing chamber. The contralateral VF was processed for transmission electron microscopy and epithelial depth analysis.ResultsAt 60 days, GC treatment maintained TEER levels similar to non‐injured/untreated controls. However, triamcinolone reduced TEER compared with saline‐treated conditions. Acutely, epithelial hyperplasia typically persisted in all injured VFs. At 60 days, only dexamethasone and triamcinolone increased epithelial depth in injured VFs; all GCs increased epithelial depth compared with non‐injured/untreated controls.ConclusionAcutely, GCs did not alter TEER. Additionally, GCs did not alter epithelial depth compared with saline treatment, indicating alignment with natural healing responses. At 60 days, GCs exhibited varying degrees of TEER restoration and epithelial hyperplasia, possibly due to distinct pharmacodynamic profiles.Level of EvidenceNA <jats:italic>Laryngoscope</jats:italic>, 2024","PeriodicalId":501696,"journal":{"name":"The Laryngoscope","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Laryngoscope","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.31729","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

IntroductionGlucocorticoids (GCs) are commonly prescribed for laryngeal indications due to their potent anti‐inflammatory properties. However, GCs effect on vocal fold (VF) epithelial morphology and barrier function following injury is overlooked and may be key to efficacy. In this study, the effects of GCs on epithelial morphology and barrier function were quantified in injured VFs. We seek to increase our understanding of biochemical processes underlying GC mechanisms to refine therapeutic strategies.MethodsMicroflap injury was induced in 65 rabbits. Seven days after injury, animals received bilateral 20 μL intracordal injections of saline, dexamethasone, methylprednisolone, or triamcinolone (n = 15 per condition). Five rabbits in each condition were euthanized 1, 7, or 60 days following treatment. An additional five animals served as non‐injured/untreated controls. To quantify transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER), 1 mm epithelial biopsies were placed in an Ussing chamber. The contralateral VF was processed for transmission electron microscopy and epithelial depth analysis.ResultsAt 60 days, GC treatment maintained TEER levels similar to non‐injured/untreated controls. However, triamcinolone reduced TEER compared with saline‐treated conditions. Acutely, epithelial hyperplasia typically persisted in all injured VFs. At 60 days, only dexamethasone and triamcinolone increased epithelial depth in injured VFs; all GCs increased epithelial depth compared with non‐injured/untreated controls.ConclusionAcutely, GCs did not alter TEER. Additionally, GCs did not alter epithelial depth compared with saline treatment, indicating alignment with natural healing responses. At 60 days, GCs exhibited varying degrees of TEER restoration and epithelial hyperplasia, possibly due to distinct pharmacodynamic profiles.Level of EvidenceNA Laryngoscope, 2024
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
类固醇对临床前模型声带损伤后上皮细胞的急性影响
导言糖皮质激素(GCs)具有强效抗炎作用,是喉部疾病的常用处方药。然而,糖皮质激素对声带损伤后上皮形态和屏障功能的影响却被忽视,这可能是影响疗效的关键。本研究量化了 GCs 对损伤声带上皮形态和屏障功能的影响。我们试图进一步了解 GC 机制的生化过程,以完善治疗策略。损伤七天后,动物接受生理盐水、地塞米松、甲基强的松龙或曲安奈德的双侧 20 μL 脐内注射(每种情况 n = 15)。治疗后 1 天、7 天或 60 天,每种情况下均有 5 只兔子被安乐死。另外五只动物作为未受伤/未治疗的对照组。为了量化经上皮电阻(TEER),将 1 毫米的上皮活检组织放入乌星室。结果60天后,GC治疗维持的TEER水平与未受伤/未治疗的对照组相似。然而,与生理盐水处理的情况相比,三苯氧胺降低了 TEER。在所有损伤的室颤中,上皮增生通常在急性期持续存在。60 天时,只有地塞米松和曲安奈德能增加损伤 VF 的上皮深度;与未损伤/未处理的对照组相比,所有 GCs 都能增加上皮深度。此外,与生理盐水治疗相比,谷胱甘肽不会改变上皮深度,这表明谷胱甘肽与自然愈合反应一致。60 天后,GCs 表现出不同程度的 TEER 恢复和上皮增生,这可能是由于不同的药效学特征所致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Tonsillectomy Versus Tonsillotomy in Pediatric Sleep-Disordered Breathing: A Systematic Review and Multi-subgroup Meta-analysis. JAK-inhibitor Tofacitinib in Severe Laryngeal Sarcoidosis: A Case Report. The Use of Water Sac Dilation in Resecting Parapharyngeal Space Benign Tumor via Transoral Approach Impact of Biologics on Surgery in Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Polyps and Allergic Fungal Sinusitis High‐Riding Innominate Artery: Booby Trap for ICU Tracheotomy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1