{"title":"Lobar shifting after lobectomy other than left upper lobectomy has a beneficial impact on postoperative pulmonary function","authors":"Sanae Kuroda, Nahoko Shimizu, Megumi Nishikubo, Wataru Nishio","doi":"10.1007/s00595-024-02915-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Purpose</h3><p>Occasionally, lobes displace after lobectomy, which is referred to as “lobar shifting”. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of lobar shifting on postoperative pulmonary function.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>We analyzed the records of 761 patients who underwent lobectomy between 2012 and 2022. The patients were categorized based on three-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT) images into those with (shift group: <i>n</i> = 510) and those without (non-shift group: <i>n</i> = 251) their postoperative subject bronchus shifting toward the head or dorsal side. The preservation rate of forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1.0) was compared between the two groups. Several factors were investigated to identify the cause of lobar shifting.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>FEV1.0 preservation rates, excluding left upper lobectomy, were significantly better in the shift group than in the non-shift group (all patients: 87.9% vs. 84.9%, <i>p</i> < 0.001; right upper lobectomy: 90.1% vs. 85.4%, <i>p</i> = 0.002; right lower lobectomy: 90.0% vs. 84.5%, <i>p</i> = 0.002; left upper lobectomy: 82.0% vs. 83.9%, <i>p</i> = 0.43; left lower lobectomy: 90.0% vs. 85.2%, <i>p</i> = 0.01). Factors that correlated with lobar shifting included age (<i>p</i> < 0.001), adhesions (<i>p</i> < 0.001), and lobulation (<i>p</i> = 0.001).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>Lobar shifting may benefit postoperative pulmonary function, excluding after left upper lobectomy. Morphological factors contribute to lobar shifting.</p>","PeriodicalId":22163,"journal":{"name":"Surgery Today","volume":"75 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery Today","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-024-02915-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose
Occasionally, lobes displace after lobectomy, which is referred to as “lobar shifting”. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of lobar shifting on postoperative pulmonary function.
Methods
We analyzed the records of 761 patients who underwent lobectomy between 2012 and 2022. The patients were categorized based on three-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT) images into those with (shift group: n = 510) and those without (non-shift group: n = 251) their postoperative subject bronchus shifting toward the head or dorsal side. The preservation rate of forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1.0) was compared between the two groups. Several factors were investigated to identify the cause of lobar shifting.
Results
FEV1.0 preservation rates, excluding left upper lobectomy, were significantly better in the shift group than in the non-shift group (all patients: 87.9% vs. 84.9%, p < 0.001; right upper lobectomy: 90.1% vs. 85.4%, p = 0.002; right lower lobectomy: 90.0% vs. 84.5%, p = 0.002; left upper lobectomy: 82.0% vs. 83.9%, p = 0.43; left lower lobectomy: 90.0% vs. 85.2%, p = 0.01). Factors that correlated with lobar shifting included age (p < 0.001), adhesions (p < 0.001), and lobulation (p = 0.001).
Conclusions
Lobar shifting may benefit postoperative pulmonary function, excluding after left upper lobectomy. Morphological factors contribute to lobar shifting.
期刊介绍:
Surgery Today is the official journal of the Japan Surgical Society. The main purpose of the journal is to provide a place for the publication of high-quality papers documenting recent advances and new developments in all fields of surgery, both clinical and experimental. The journal welcomes original papers, review articles, and short communications, as well as short technical reports("How to do it").
The "How to do it" section will includes short articles on methods or techniques recommended for practical surgery. Papers submitted to the journal are reviewed by an international editorial board. Field of interest: All fields of surgery.