Lobar shifting after lobectomy other than left upper lobectomy has a beneficial impact on postoperative pulmonary function

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Surgery Today Pub Date : 2024-09-19 DOI:10.1007/s00595-024-02915-w
Sanae Kuroda, Nahoko Shimizu, Megumi Nishikubo, Wataru Nishio
{"title":"Lobar shifting after lobectomy other than left upper lobectomy has a beneficial impact on postoperative pulmonary function","authors":"Sanae Kuroda, Nahoko Shimizu, Megumi Nishikubo, Wataru Nishio","doi":"10.1007/s00595-024-02915-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Purpose</h3><p>Occasionally, lobes displace after lobectomy, which is referred to as “lobar shifting”. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of lobar shifting on postoperative pulmonary function.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>We analyzed the records of 761 patients who underwent lobectomy between 2012 and 2022. The patients were categorized based on three-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT) images into those with (shift group: <i>n</i> = 510) and those without (non-shift group: <i>n</i> = 251) their postoperative subject bronchus shifting toward the head or dorsal side. The preservation rate of forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1.0) was compared between the two groups. Several factors were investigated to identify the cause of lobar shifting.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>FEV1.0 preservation rates, excluding left upper lobectomy, were significantly better in the shift group than in the non-shift group (all patients: 87.9% vs. 84.9%, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001; right upper lobectomy: 90.1% vs. 85.4%, <i>p</i> = 0.002; right lower lobectomy: 90.0% vs. 84.5%, <i>p</i> = 0.002; left upper lobectomy: 82.0% vs. 83.9%, <i>p</i> = 0.43; left lower lobectomy: 90.0% vs. 85.2%, <i>p</i> = 0.01). Factors that correlated with lobar shifting included age (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), adhesions (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), and lobulation (<i>p</i> = 0.001).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>Lobar shifting may benefit postoperative pulmonary function, excluding after left upper lobectomy. Morphological factors contribute to lobar shifting.</p>","PeriodicalId":22163,"journal":{"name":"Surgery Today","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery Today","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-024-02915-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Occasionally, lobes displace after lobectomy, which is referred to as “lobar shifting”. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of lobar shifting on postoperative pulmonary function.

Methods

We analyzed the records of 761 patients who underwent lobectomy between 2012 and 2022. The patients were categorized based on three-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT) images into those with (shift group: n = 510) and those without (non-shift group: n = 251) their postoperative subject bronchus shifting toward the head or dorsal side. The preservation rate of forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1.0) was compared between the two groups. Several factors were investigated to identify the cause of lobar shifting.

Results

FEV1.0 preservation rates, excluding left upper lobectomy, were significantly better in the shift group than in the non-shift group (all patients: 87.9% vs. 84.9%, p < 0.001; right upper lobectomy: 90.1% vs. 85.4%, p = 0.002; right lower lobectomy: 90.0% vs. 84.5%, p = 0.002; left upper lobectomy: 82.0% vs. 83.9%, p = 0.43; left lower lobectomy: 90.0% vs. 85.2%, p = 0.01). Factors that correlated with lobar shifting included age (p < 0.001), adhesions (p < 0.001), and lobulation (p = 0.001).

Conclusions

Lobar shifting may benefit postoperative pulmonary function, excluding after left upper lobectomy. Morphological factors contribute to lobar shifting.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
除左上肺叶切除术外,肺叶切除术后的肺叶移位对术后肺功能有有益影响
目的肺叶切除术后偶尔会出现肺叶移位,这被称为 "肺叶移位"。方法 我们分析了 2012 年至 2022 年期间接受肺叶切除术的 761 例患者的病历。根据三维计算机断层扫描(3D-CT)图像将患者分为术后主体支气管向头部或背侧移位的患者(移位组:n = 510)和未移位的患者(未移位组:n = 251)。两组患者一秒钟用力呼气容积(FEV1.0)的保持率进行了比较。结果FEV1.0的保存率(不包括左上肺叶切除术),移位组明显优于非移位组(所有患者:87.9% 对 84.5%):87.9% vs. 84.9%,p < 0.001;右上叶切除术:90.1% vs. 85.4%,p = 0.002;右下叶切除术:90.0% vs. 84.5%,p = 0.002;左上叶切除术:82.0% vs. 83.9%,p = 0.43;左下叶切除术:90.0% vs. 85.2%,p = 0.01)。与肺叶移位相关的因素包括年龄(p < 0.001)、粘连(p < 0.001)和分叶(p = 0.001)。形态学因素有助于肺叶移位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Surgery Today
Surgery Today 医学-外科
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
4.00%
发文量
208
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Surgery Today is the official journal of the Japan Surgical Society. The main purpose of the journal is to provide a place for the publication of high-quality papers documenting recent advances and new developments in all fields of surgery, both clinical and experimental. The journal welcomes original papers, review articles, and short communications, as well as short technical reports("How to do it"). The "How to do it" section will includes short articles on methods or techniques recommended for practical surgery. Papers submitted to the journal are reviewed by an international editorial board. Field of interest: All fields of surgery.
期刊最新文献
Is the use of direct oral anticoagulants after non-cardiac thoracic surgery safe for patients? Anemia rates after one-anastomosis gastric bypass versus sleeve gastrectomy: a retrospective cohort study. Outcomes and pathologic response of primary lung cancer treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitor/immune checkpoint inhibitor before salvage surgery. Simple pelvimetry predicts the pelvic manipulation time in robot-assisted low and ultra-low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Development of a laparoscopic sigmoidectomy simulator: Sigmaster.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1