Identification of Growth Differentiation Factor-15 as An Early Predictive Biomarker for Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatohepatitis: A Nested Case-control Study of UK Biobank Proteomic Data

Hao Wang, Xiaoqian Xu, Yameng Sun, Hong You, Jidong Jia, You-Wen He, Yuanyuan Kong
{"title":"Identification of Growth Differentiation Factor-15 as An Early Predictive Biomarker for Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatohepatitis: A Nested Case-control Study of UK Biobank Proteomic Data","authors":"Hao Wang, Xiaoqian Xu, Yameng Sun, Hong You, Jidong Jia, You-Wen He, Yuanyuan Kong","doi":"10.1101/2024.09.12.612665","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background/Aims: This study aims to determine the predictive capability for metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) long before its diagnosis by using six previously identified diagnostic biomarkers for metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) with proteomic data from the UK Biobank.\nMethods: A nested case-control study comprising of a MASH group and three age- and sex-matched controls groups (metabolic dysfunction-associated steatosis, viral hepatitis, and normal liver controls) were conducted. Olink proteomics, anthropometric and biochemical data at baseline levels were obtained from the UK Biobank. The baseline levels of CDCP1, FABP4, FGF21, GDF15, IL-6 and THBS2 were analyzed prospectively to determine their predictive accuracy for subsequent diagnosis with a mean lag time of over 10 years.\nResults: At baseline, GDF15 demonstrated the best performance for predicting MASH occurrence at 5 and 10 years later, with an AUC of 0.90 at 5 years and 0.86 at 10 years. A predictive model based on four biomarkers (GDF15, FGF21, IL-6, and THBS2) showed AUCs of 0.88 at both 5 and 10 years. Furthermore, a protein-clinical model that included these four circulating protein biomarkers along with three clinical factors (BMI, ALT and TC) yielded AUCs of 0.92 at 5 years and 0.89 at 10 years. Conclusions: GDF15 at baseline levels outperformed other individual circulating protein biomarkers for the early prediction of MASH. Our data suggest that GDF15 and the GDF15-based model may be used as easy-to-implement tools to identify patients with high risk of developing MASH at a mean lag time of over 10 years.","PeriodicalId":501108,"journal":{"name":"bioRxiv - Molecular Biology","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"bioRxiv - Molecular Biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.12.612665","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Aims: This study aims to determine the predictive capability for metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) long before its diagnosis by using six previously identified diagnostic biomarkers for metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) with proteomic data from the UK Biobank. Methods: A nested case-control study comprising of a MASH group and three age- and sex-matched controls groups (metabolic dysfunction-associated steatosis, viral hepatitis, and normal liver controls) were conducted. Olink proteomics, anthropometric and biochemical data at baseline levels were obtained from the UK Biobank. The baseline levels of CDCP1, FABP4, FGF21, GDF15, IL-6 and THBS2 were analyzed prospectively to determine their predictive accuracy for subsequent diagnosis with a mean lag time of over 10 years. Results: At baseline, GDF15 demonstrated the best performance for predicting MASH occurrence at 5 and 10 years later, with an AUC of 0.90 at 5 years and 0.86 at 10 years. A predictive model based on four biomarkers (GDF15, FGF21, IL-6, and THBS2) showed AUCs of 0.88 at both 5 and 10 years. Furthermore, a protein-clinical model that included these four circulating protein biomarkers along with three clinical factors (BMI, ALT and TC) yielded AUCs of 0.92 at 5 years and 0.89 at 10 years. Conclusions: GDF15 at baseline levels outperformed other individual circulating protein biomarkers for the early prediction of MASH. Our data suggest that GDF15 and the GDF15-based model may be used as easy-to-implement tools to identify patients with high risk of developing MASH at a mean lag time of over 10 years.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
将生长分化因子-15 鉴定为代谢功能障碍相关性脂肪性肝炎的早期预测性生物标记物:英国生物库蛋白质组数据的嵌套病例对照研究
背景/目的:本研究旨在利用之前确定的代谢功能障碍相关性脂肪性肝病(MASLD)的六个诊断生物标志物和英国生物库的蛋白质组数据,确定代谢功能障碍相关性脂肪性肝病(MASH)在确诊前的预测能力:方法:进行了一项巢式病例对照研究,包括一个MASH组和三个年龄和性别匹配的对照组(代谢功能障碍相关性脂肪肝、病毒性肝炎和正常肝脏对照组)。基线水平的 Olink 蛋白质组学、人体测量和生化数据来自英国生物库。对 CDCP1、FABP4、FGF21、GDF15、IL-6 和 THBS2 的基线水平进行了前瞻性分析,以确定它们对随后诊断的预测准确性,平均滞后时间超过 10 年:基线时,GDF15在预测5年和10年后MASH发生率方面表现最佳,5年时的AUC为0.90,10年时的AUC为0.86。基于四种生物标记物(GDF15、FGF21、IL-6和THBS2)的预测模型显示,5年和10年后的AUC均为0.88。此外,蛋白质-临床模型包括这四种循环蛋白质生物标志物和三种临床因素(BMI、ALT 和 TC),5 年和 10 年的 AUC 分别为 0.92 和 0.89。结论在早期预测MASH方面,基线水平的GDF15优于其他单个循环蛋白生物标志物。我们的数据表明,GDF15 和基于 GDF15 的模型可作为易于实施的工具,在平均滞后时间超过 10 年的情况下识别出 MASH 高风险患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Transcriptomic landscape of sex differences in obesity and type 2 diabetes in subcutaneous adipose tissue U2AF regulates the translation and localization of nuclear-encoded mitochondrial mRNAs Core splicing architecture and early spliceosomal recognition determine microexon sensitivity to SRRM3/4 CRISPR/Cas9-induced breaks are insufficient to break linkage drag surrounding the ToMV locus of Solanum lycopersicum Medin Induces Pro-Inflammatory Activation of Human Brain Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1