Does the procedural deficit hypothesis of dyslexia account for the lack of automatization and the comorbidity among developmental disorders?

IF 2.6 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY Cognitive Neuropsychology Pub Date : 2024-09-18 DOI:10.1080/02643294.2024.2393447
Chiara Valeria Marinelli,Marialuisa Martelli,Pierluigi Zoccolotti
{"title":"Does the procedural deficit hypothesis of dyslexia account for the lack of automatization and the comorbidity among developmental disorders?","authors":"Chiara Valeria Marinelli,Marialuisa Martelli,Pierluigi Zoccolotti","doi":"10.1080/02643294.2024.2393447","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We critically examine the procedural deficit hypothesis (PDH) that proposes that a deficit in procedural (as opposed to declarative) learning underlies dyslexia and other developmental disorders. We first note that the existence of dissociated learning disorders (and multiple forms for each disorder) appears incompatible with a general deficit account. Moreover, the PDH formulation appears generally underspecified in terms of predictions to be tested. A particular focus is on the conceptualization of automatization. However, there are alternative views of automaticity, and comparing these different views helps frame the body of findings on the PDH. The insufficient PDH specification led to tasks touching on different skills and selecting target groups based on general diagnostic categories. Accordingly, several recent reviews and meta-analyses reported mixed patterns of findings and reached contradictory conclusions on the PDH. We propose avenues for future research to effectively examine the role of PDH in learning and other developmental disorders.","PeriodicalId":50670,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Neuropsychology","volume":"69 1","pages":"1-20"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Neuropsychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02643294.2024.2393447","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We critically examine the procedural deficit hypothesis (PDH) that proposes that a deficit in procedural (as opposed to declarative) learning underlies dyslexia and other developmental disorders. We first note that the existence of dissociated learning disorders (and multiple forms for each disorder) appears incompatible with a general deficit account. Moreover, the PDH formulation appears generally underspecified in terms of predictions to be tested. A particular focus is on the conceptualization of automatization. However, there are alternative views of automaticity, and comparing these different views helps frame the body of findings on the PDH. The insufficient PDH specification led to tasks touching on different skills and selecting target groups based on general diagnostic categories. Accordingly, several recent reviews and meta-analyses reported mixed patterns of findings and reached contradictory conclusions on the PDH. We propose avenues for future research to effectively examine the role of PDH in learning and other developmental disorders.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
诵读困难的程序性缺陷假说是否能解释发育障碍中缺乏自动化和合并症的问题?
我们对程序性缺陷假说(PDH)进行了批判性研究,该假说认为,程序性(相对于陈述性)学习缺陷是阅读障碍和其他发育障碍的根源。我们首先注意到,不同学习障碍(以及每种障碍的多种形式)的存在似乎与一般缺陷的说法不一致。此外,就有待检验的预测而言,PDH 的表述总体上似乎不够具体。一个特别的重点是自动化的概念化。然而,关于自动性还有其他观点,对这些不同观点进行比较有助于确定关于 PDH 的研究结果的框架。PDH 规范的不足导致任务涉及不同的技能,并根据一般诊断类别选择目标群体。因此,最近的一些综述和荟萃分析报告了不同的研究结果,并得出了相互矛盾的结论。我们提出了未来研究的途径,以便有效地研究 PDH 在学习和其他发育障碍中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cognitive Neuropsychology
Cognitive Neuropsychology 医学-心理学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
23
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cognitive Neuropsychology is of interest to cognitive scientists and neuroscientists, neuropsychologists, neurologists, psycholinguists, speech pathologists, physiotherapists, and psychiatrists.
期刊最新文献
The localization of coma. Does the procedural deficit hypothesis of dyslexia account for the lack of automatization and the comorbidity among developmental disorders? Developmental surface dyslexia and dysgraphia in a child with corpus callosum agenesis: an approach to diagnosis and treatment. The heterogeneity of holistic processing profiles in developmental prosopagnosia: holistic processing is impaired but not absent. The relationship between semantics, phonology, and naming performance in aphasia: a structural equation modeling approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1