Is it possible to obtain substitutes for human milk oligosaccharides from bovine milk, goat milk, or other mammal milks?

IF 12 1区 农林科学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety Pub Date : 2024-09-20 DOI:10.1111/1541-4337.70018
Yishan Jiang, Tianrui Sun, Yihan Lin, Manshun Liu, Xin Wang
{"title":"Is it possible to obtain substitutes for human milk oligosaccharides from bovine milk, goat milk, or other mammal milks?","authors":"Yishan Jiang,&nbsp;Tianrui Sun,&nbsp;Yihan Lin,&nbsp;Manshun Liu,&nbsp;Xin Wang","doi":"10.1111/1541-4337.70018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Considering the current level of chemical and biological synthesis technology, it was a sensible selection to obtain milk oligosaccharides (MOs) from other mammals as the potential substitute for human MOs (HMOs) that possessed various structural features in the infant formula. Through a comprehensive analysis of the content, structure, and function of MOs in six distinct varieties of mammal milk, it has been shown that goat milk was the most suitable material for the preparation as a human milk substitute. Goat MOs (GMOs) had a relatively high content and diverse structural features compared to those found in other mammalian milks. The concentration of GMOs in colostrum ranged from 60 to 350 mg/L, whereas in mature milk, it ranged from 200 to 24,00 mg/L. The acidic oligosaccharides in goat milk have attracted considerable attention due to their closeness in acidic content and structural diversity with HMOs. Simultaneously, it was discovered that some structures, like <i>N</i>-glycolylneuraminic acid, were found to have a certain content in GMOs and served essential functional properties. Moreover, studies focused on the extraction of MOs from goat milk indicated that the production of GMOs on an industrial scale was viable. Furthermore, it is imperative to do further study on GMOs to enhance the preparation process, discover of new MOs structures and bioactivity evaluation, which will contribute to the development of both the commercial production of MOs and the goat milk industry.</p>","PeriodicalId":155,"journal":{"name":"Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety","volume":"23 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1541-4337.70018","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Considering the current level of chemical and biological synthesis technology, it was a sensible selection to obtain milk oligosaccharides (MOs) from other mammals as the potential substitute for human MOs (HMOs) that possessed various structural features in the infant formula. Through a comprehensive analysis of the content, structure, and function of MOs in six distinct varieties of mammal milk, it has been shown that goat milk was the most suitable material for the preparation as a human milk substitute. Goat MOs (GMOs) had a relatively high content and diverse structural features compared to those found in other mammalian milks. The concentration of GMOs in colostrum ranged from 60 to 350 mg/L, whereas in mature milk, it ranged from 200 to 24,00 mg/L. The acidic oligosaccharides in goat milk have attracted considerable attention due to their closeness in acidic content and structural diversity with HMOs. Simultaneously, it was discovered that some structures, like N-glycolylneuraminic acid, were found to have a certain content in GMOs and served essential functional properties. Moreover, studies focused on the extraction of MOs from goat milk indicated that the production of GMOs on an industrial scale was viable. Furthermore, it is imperative to do further study on GMOs to enhance the preparation process, discover of new MOs structures and bioactivity evaluation, which will contribute to the development of both the commercial production of MOs and the goat milk industry.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
是否有可能从牛奶、山羊奶或其他哺乳动物奶中获得人乳低聚糖的替代品?
考虑到目前的化学和生物合成技术水平,从其他哺乳动物中获取具有不同结构特征的乳寡糖(MOs)作为婴幼儿配方奶粉中人乳寡糖(HMOs)的潜在替代品是一个明智的选择。通过对六种不同哺乳动物乳汁中 MO 的含量、结构和功能进行综合分析,结果表明山羊奶是最适合用作人乳替代品的原料。与其他哺乳动物奶中的MOs相比,山羊奶中的MOs(GMOs)含量相对较高,结构特征多样。初乳中 GMOs 的浓度介于 60 至 350 毫克/升之间,而成熟牛奶中的浓度介于 200 至 24 00 毫克/升之间。山羊奶中的酸性低聚糖因其酸性成分和结构多样性与 HMOs 相似而备受关注。同时,人们还发现一些结构,如 N-乙酰神经氨酸,在 GMOs 中具有一定的含量,并具有重要的功能特性。此外,关于从山羊奶中提取 MOs 的研究表明,在工业规模上生产转基因生物是可行的。此外,当务之急是进一步研究 GMOs,以改进制备工艺、发现新的 MOs 结构并进行生物活性评估,这将有助于 MOs 商业化生产和羊奶产业的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
26.20
自引率
2.70%
发文量
182
期刊介绍: Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety (CRFSFS) is an online peer-reviewed journal established in 2002. It aims to provide scientists with unique and comprehensive reviews covering various aspects of food science and technology. CRFSFS publishes in-depth reviews addressing the chemical, microbiological, physical, sensory, and nutritional properties of foods, as well as food processing, engineering, analytical methods, and packaging. Manuscripts should contribute new insights and recommendations to the scientific knowledge on the topic. The journal prioritizes recent developments and encourages critical assessment of experimental design and interpretation of results. Topics related to food safety, such as preventive controls, ingredient contaminants, storage, food authenticity, and adulteration, are considered. Reviews on food hazards must demonstrate validity and reliability in real food systems, not just in model systems. Additionally, reviews on nutritional properties should provide a realistic perspective on how foods influence health, considering processing and storage effects on bioactivity. The journal also accepts reviews on consumer behavior, risk assessment, food regulations, and post-harvest physiology. Authors are encouraged to consult the Editor in Chief before submission to ensure topic suitability. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses on analytical and sensory methods, quality control, and food safety approaches are welcomed, with authors advised to follow IFIS Good review practice guidelines.
期刊最新文献
Dairy and nondairy proteins as nano-architecture structures for delivering phenolic compounds: Unraveling their molecular interactions to maximize health benefits Food packaging technology considerations for designers: Attending to food, consumer, manufacturer, and environmental issues Machine vision combined with deep learning–based approaches for food authentication: An integrative review and new insights Reports of tropane alkaloid poisonings and analytical techniques for their determination in food crops and products from 2013 to 2023 Risks of foodborne pathogens associated with animal contamination of raw-agricultural commodities: A review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1