Quantitative cervicovaginal fluid fetal fibronectin: A liquid biopsy for intra-amniotic inflammation

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica Pub Date : 2024-09-17 DOI:10.1111/aogs.14899
Puntabut Warintaksa, Roberto Romero, Waranyu Lertrat, Nutnaree Yuenyongdechawat, Paninee Mongkolsuk, Supakorn Chaiyakarn, Rapeewan Settacomkul, Pisut Pongchaikul, Pornpun Vivithanaporn, Piya Chaemsaithong
{"title":"Quantitative cervicovaginal fluid fetal fibronectin: A liquid biopsy for intra-amniotic inflammation","authors":"Puntabut Warintaksa,&nbsp;Roberto Romero,&nbsp;Waranyu Lertrat,&nbsp;Nutnaree Yuenyongdechawat,&nbsp;Paninee Mongkolsuk,&nbsp;Supakorn Chaiyakarn,&nbsp;Rapeewan Settacomkul,&nbsp;Pisut Pongchaikul,&nbsp;Pornpun Vivithanaporn,&nbsp;Piya Chaemsaithong","doi":"10.1111/aogs.14899","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Intra-amniotic inflammation is causally linked to spontaneous preterm labor. The gold standard for the diagnosis of intra-amniotic inflammation is the determination of an amniotic fluid profile obtained from transabdominal amniocentesis, which is invasive. Cervicovaginal fluid fetal fibronectin (fFN) is a widely-used predictive biomarker for spontaneous preterm labor. The aims of this study are to determine (1) whether a quantitative cervicovaginal fluid fFN test can be used to identify the presence of intra-amniotic inflammation; and (2) an appropriate cut-off value of a cervicovaginal fluid fFN concentration for the identification of intra-amniotic inflammation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Material and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This prospective cohort study included 78 patients with preterm labor and intact membranes who had a sample collected for quantitative cervicovaginal fluid fFN measurement and underwent transabdominal amniocentesis. Intra-amniotic inflammation was defined as an amniotic fluid interleukin-6 concentration ≥2.6 ng/mL. Clinicians were masked from the results of cervicovaginal fluid fFN and amniotic fluid interleukin-6 concentrations. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine which factors were significant predictors of intra-amniotic inflammation. The diagnostic indices of the cervicovaginal fluid fFN test for the identification of intra-amniotic inflammation were calculated.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>(1) Frequency of intra-amniotic inflammation was 26.9% (21/78); (2) the higher the cervicovaginal fluid fFN concentration, the greater the risk of intra-amniotic inflammation (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001); (3) cervicovaginal fluid fFN concentration ≥125 ng/mL had an area under the curve of 0.91 (95% confidence interval: 0.83–0.96) for the identification of intra-amniotic inflammation with 100% sensitivity, 100% negative predictive value, 82.46% specificity and a positive likelihood ratio of 5.7; and (4) cervicovaginal fluid fFN cut-off of 125 ng/mL had a significant higher predictive performance than the traditional cut-off (50 ng/mL) for the identification of intra-amniotic inflammation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Quantitative cervicovaginal fluid fFN with a cut-off of 125 ng/mL had a high sensitivity and a negative predictive value as well as a positive likelihood ratio for the identification of intra-amniotic inflammation. Its high sensitivity and negative predictive value can be used to decrease an index of suspicion of intra-amniotic inflammation. This test may be useful as an initial assessment test to select appropriate patients for amniocentesis to determine intra-amniotic inflammation.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":6990,"journal":{"name":"Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica","volume":"103 11","pages":"2252-2263"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/aogs.14899","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aogs.14899","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Intra-amniotic inflammation is causally linked to spontaneous preterm labor. The gold standard for the diagnosis of intra-amniotic inflammation is the determination of an amniotic fluid profile obtained from transabdominal amniocentesis, which is invasive. Cervicovaginal fluid fetal fibronectin (fFN) is a widely-used predictive biomarker for spontaneous preterm labor. The aims of this study are to determine (1) whether a quantitative cervicovaginal fluid fFN test can be used to identify the presence of intra-amniotic inflammation; and (2) an appropriate cut-off value of a cervicovaginal fluid fFN concentration for the identification of intra-amniotic inflammation.

Material and Methods

This prospective cohort study included 78 patients with preterm labor and intact membranes who had a sample collected for quantitative cervicovaginal fluid fFN measurement and underwent transabdominal amniocentesis. Intra-amniotic inflammation was defined as an amniotic fluid interleukin-6 concentration ≥2.6 ng/mL. Clinicians were masked from the results of cervicovaginal fluid fFN and amniotic fluid interleukin-6 concentrations. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine which factors were significant predictors of intra-amniotic inflammation. The diagnostic indices of the cervicovaginal fluid fFN test for the identification of intra-amniotic inflammation were calculated.

Results

(1) Frequency of intra-amniotic inflammation was 26.9% (21/78); (2) the higher the cervicovaginal fluid fFN concentration, the greater the risk of intra-amniotic inflammation (p < 0.001); (3) cervicovaginal fluid fFN concentration ≥125 ng/mL had an area under the curve of 0.91 (95% confidence interval: 0.83–0.96) for the identification of intra-amniotic inflammation with 100% sensitivity, 100% negative predictive value, 82.46% specificity and a positive likelihood ratio of 5.7; and (4) cervicovaginal fluid fFN cut-off of 125 ng/mL had a significant higher predictive performance than the traditional cut-off (50 ng/mL) for the identification of intra-amniotic inflammation.

Conclusions

Quantitative cervicovaginal fluid fFN with a cut-off of 125 ng/mL had a high sensitivity and a negative predictive value as well as a positive likelihood ratio for the identification of intra-amniotic inflammation. Its high sensitivity and negative predictive value can be used to decrease an index of suspicion of intra-amniotic inflammation. This test may be useful as an initial assessment test to select appropriate patients for amniocentesis to determine intra-amniotic inflammation.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
定量宫颈阴道液胎儿纤维连接蛋白:羊膜腔内炎症的液体活检方法
导言羊膜腔内炎症与自发性早产有因果关系。诊断羊膜腔内炎症的金标准是通过经腹羊膜腔穿刺术获得羊水图谱,但这种方法具有创伤性。宫颈阴道液胎儿纤连蛋白(fFN)是一种广泛使用的预测自发性早产的生物标志物。本研究旨在确定:(1)宫颈阴道液胎儿纤连蛋白定量检测是否可用于识别羊膜腔内炎症的存在;(2)宫颈阴道液胎纤连蛋白浓度的合适临界值,以识别羊膜腔内炎症。材料与方法这项前瞻性队列研究纳入了 78 例早产且胎膜完整的患者,这些患者均采集了宫颈阴道液 fFN 定量测定样本,并接受了经腹羊膜腔穿刺术。羊膜腔内炎症定义为羊水白细胞介素-6浓度≥2.6纳克/毫升。临床医生对宫颈阴道液 fFN 和羊水白细胞介素-6 浓度的结果进行了屏蔽。采用逻辑回归分析确定哪些因素可显著预测羊膜腔内炎症。结果(1)羊膜腔内炎症发生率为 26.9%(21/78);(2)宫颈阴道液 fFN 浓度越高,羊膜腔内炎症发生风险越大(P < 0.001);(3)宫颈阴道液fFN浓度≥125 ng/mL时,鉴定羊膜腔内炎症的曲线下面积为0.91(95%置信区间:0.83-0.96),敏感性100%,阴性预测值100%,82.46%的特异性和5.7的阳性似然比;(4)宫颈阴道液fFN临界值为125 ng/mL比传统的临界值(50 ng/mL)对羊膜腔内炎症的鉴定具有更高的预测性能。它的高灵敏度和阴性预测值可用于降低羊膜腔内炎症的怀疑指数。该试验可作为初步评估试验,用于选择合适的患者进行羊膜穿刺术以确定羊膜腔内炎症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
4.70%
发文量
180
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Published monthly, Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica is an international journal dedicated to providing the very latest information on the results of both clinical, basic and translational research work related to all aspects of women’s health from around the globe. The journal regularly publishes commentaries, reviews, and original articles on a wide variety of topics including: gynecology, pregnancy, birth, female urology, gynecologic oncology, fertility and reproductive biology.
期刊最新文献
Hospital obstetric volume and maternal outcomes: Does hospital size matter? Prediction of uterine rupture in singleton pregnancies with one prior cesarean birth undergoing TOLAC: A cross-sectional study. Maternal asthma during pregnancy and the likelihood of neurodevelopmental disorders in offspring. May the indication for a previous cesarean section affect the outcome at trial of labor in women with induction of labor? A retrospective cohort study. The interplay of body mass index, gestational weight gain, and birthweight over 3800 g in vaginal breech birth: A retrospective study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1