Swapping Level of Service for Vehicle Miles Traveled in Project-Level Environmental Impact Analysis: Trends and Challenges in California

Reyhane Hosseinzade, Jamey M. B. Volker, Mira Evans
{"title":"Swapping Level of Service for Vehicle Miles Traveled in Project-Level Environmental Impact Analysis: Trends and Challenges in California","authors":"Reyhane Hosseinzade, Jamey M. B. Volker, Mira Evans","doi":"10.1177/03611981241275533","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Automobile level of service (LOS) is the longest-standing and most commonly used performance metric in transportation impact analysis in the U.S. However, Senate Bill (SB) 743 upended that status quo for environmental impact review of land development projects in California, requiring that local governments analyze vehicle miles traveled (VMT) rather than LOS. In this study, we investigated how California’s local governments have responded to the mandated LOS-to-VMT switch. We obtained and analyzed information for 274 of the state’s 539 cities and counties, using expert interviews, documentary reviews, website searches, and communications with local government staff. We found that most jurisdictions had either adopted or were in the process of adopting their own VMT impact standards, though difficulties in implementing VMT-based standards were common and were more pronounced for smaller and more rural jurisdictions. In their standards, most jurisdictions hewed closely to the recommendations of the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research. Despite switching to VMT analysis for environmental review purposes, all respondent jurisdictions continued to use LOS outside the environmental review process. Overall, we found a consensus amongst our interviewees that swapping LOS for VMT could streamline development in urban areas but not in more suburban or rural jurisdictions. Our findings are specific to California, but they can provide useful guidance to other states or local governments outside of California that are considering adopting a VMT-based metric for transportation impact analyses.","PeriodicalId":517391,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board","volume":"42 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981241275533","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Automobile level of service (LOS) is the longest-standing and most commonly used performance metric in transportation impact analysis in the U.S. However, Senate Bill (SB) 743 upended that status quo for environmental impact review of land development projects in California, requiring that local governments analyze vehicle miles traveled (VMT) rather than LOS. In this study, we investigated how California’s local governments have responded to the mandated LOS-to-VMT switch. We obtained and analyzed information for 274 of the state’s 539 cities and counties, using expert interviews, documentary reviews, website searches, and communications with local government staff. We found that most jurisdictions had either adopted or were in the process of adopting their own VMT impact standards, though difficulties in implementing VMT-based standards were common and were more pronounced for smaller and more rural jurisdictions. In their standards, most jurisdictions hewed closely to the recommendations of the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research. Despite switching to VMT analysis for environmental review purposes, all respondent jurisdictions continued to use LOS outside the environmental review process. Overall, we found a consensus amongst our interviewees that swapping LOS for VMT could streamline development in urban areas but not in more suburban or rural jurisdictions. Our findings are specific to California, but they can provide useful guidance to other states or local governments outside of California that are considering adopting a VMT-based metric for transportation impact analyses.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在项目级环境影响分析中以车辆行驶里程换取服务水平:加利福尼亚州的趋势与挑战
汽车服务水平(LOS)是美国交通影响分析中历史最悠久、最常用的性能指标。然而,参议院第 743 号法案(SB)打破了加州土地开发项目环境影响审查的现状,要求地方政府分析车辆行驶里程(VMT),而不是 LOS。在本研究中,我们调查了加州地方政府是如何应对从 LOS 到 VMT 的转变的。我们通过专家访谈、文件审查、网站搜索以及与地方政府工作人员的沟通,获得并分析了该州 539 个市县中 274 个市县的信息。我们发现,大多数辖区都已经采用或正在采用自己的 VMT 影响标准,尽管在实施基于 VMT 的标准方面普遍存在困难,而且在较小和较偏远的辖区更为明显。在其标准中,大多数辖区都严格遵循了州长规划与研究办公室的建议。尽管在环境审查中改用 VMT 分析,但所有受访辖区在环境审查过程之外仍继续使用 LOS。总体而言,我们发现受访者一致认为,将 LOS 换成 VMT 可简化城市地区的发展,但在郊区或农村地区则不然。我们的研究结果是针对加利福尼亚州的,但可以为加利福尼亚州以外的其他州或地方政府提供有用的指导,这些州或地方政府正在考虑在交通影响分析中采用基于 VMT 的指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Ordinal Clustering Based Homogeneous Road Segments in Asphalt Pavement Maintenance and Rehabilitation Optimized Decision-Making Exploring the Relationship Between COVID-19 Transmission and Population Mobility over Time CTAFFNet: CNN–Transformer Adaptive Feature Fusion Object Detection Algorithm for Complex Traffic Scenarios Eye Movement Evaluation of Pedestrians' Mobile Phone Usage at Street Crossings Impact of Texting-Induced Distraction on Driving Behavior Based on Field Operation Tests
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1