{"title":"Investigating the Interrelationships among Factors Associated with Automated Vehicle Crashes Using Additive Bayesian Network","authors":"Chunxi Huang, Ange Wang, Song Yan, Dengbo He","doi":"10.1177/03611981241274152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although automated vehicles (AVs) were considered a promising solution to enhance traffic safety by eliminating human errors, AV crashes still happen in mixed traffic consisting of human-driven vehicles and AVs. Thus, to reduce AV-involved crashes, it is necessary to understand the factors leading to AV crashes. However, traditional regression-based methods may not reveal a structured relationship among leading factors of AV crashes, which hinders the exploration of countermeasures to AV crashes. Based on the 246 AV crash records collected by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, this study investigated the factors associated with AV crashes. An additive Bayesian network (ABN) approach was utilized to construct the topological relationship among potential influential factors of AV crashes, followed by post-ABN regression analyses. Results show that, though AV technologies have developed rapidly in the past few years, rear-end crashes are still dominant among AV-involved crashes, potentially because of the discrepancy in the driving behaviors between AV and human-driven vehicles. The crash type of AV-involved crashes is more related to the pre-crash movements of crash partners than it is to the pre-crash movements of AVs, while crash outcomes (e.g., injury severity) are associated with the environmental factors (e.g., operating entities) and crash-procedure-related factors (e.g., crash type). Findings from this study aid in understanding AV crash patterns, which can inform targeted interventions and technology advancements to improve safety outcomes for all road users.","PeriodicalId":517391,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board","volume":"202 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981241274152","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Although automated vehicles (AVs) were considered a promising solution to enhance traffic safety by eliminating human errors, AV crashes still happen in mixed traffic consisting of human-driven vehicles and AVs. Thus, to reduce AV-involved crashes, it is necessary to understand the factors leading to AV crashes. However, traditional regression-based methods may not reveal a structured relationship among leading factors of AV crashes, which hinders the exploration of countermeasures to AV crashes. Based on the 246 AV crash records collected by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, this study investigated the factors associated with AV crashes. An additive Bayesian network (ABN) approach was utilized to construct the topological relationship among potential influential factors of AV crashes, followed by post-ABN regression analyses. Results show that, though AV technologies have developed rapidly in the past few years, rear-end crashes are still dominant among AV-involved crashes, potentially because of the discrepancy in the driving behaviors between AV and human-driven vehicles. The crash type of AV-involved crashes is more related to the pre-crash movements of crash partners than it is to the pre-crash movements of AVs, while crash outcomes (e.g., injury severity) are associated with the environmental factors (e.g., operating entities) and crash-procedure-related factors (e.g., crash type). Findings from this study aid in understanding AV crash patterns, which can inform targeted interventions and technology advancements to improve safety outcomes for all road users.
尽管自动驾驶汽车(AV)被认为是消除人为失误、提高交通安全的一种有前途的解决方案,但在由人类驾驶的车辆和自动驾驶汽车组成的混合交通中,自动驾驶汽车撞车事故仍然时有发生。因此,要减少涉及自动驾驶汽车的碰撞事故,就必须了解导致自动驾驶汽车碰撞事故的因素。然而,基于回归的传统方法可能无法揭示导致反车辆交通事故的主要因素之间的结构性关系,这阻碍了对反车辆交通事故对策的探索。本研究以美国国家公路交通安全管理局收集的 246 起自动驾驶汽车碰撞事故记录为基础,调查了与自动驾驶汽车碰撞事故相关的因素。研究采用加法贝叶斯网络(ABN)方法构建了自动驾驶汽车碰撞事故潜在影响因素之间的拓扑关系,然后进行了ABN后回归分析。结果表明,虽然 AV 技术在过去几年中发展迅速,但在 AV 引起的碰撞事故中,追尾碰撞事故仍占主导地位,这可能是由于 AV 车辆与人类驾驶的车辆在驾驶行为上存在差异。在涉及 AV 的撞车事故中,撞车类型与撞车伙伴的撞车前动作的关系比与 AV 的撞车前动作的关系更大,而撞车结果(如受伤严重程度)则与环境因素(如运营实体)和撞车程序相关因素(如撞车类型)有关。这项研究的结果有助于了解自动驾驶汽车的碰撞模式,从而为有针对性的干预措施和技术进步提供依据,以改善所有道路使用者的安全结果。