Umbilical Line Securement Bundle to Reduce Line Loss in the Neonate.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Advances in Neonatal Care Pub Date : 2024-09-13 DOI:10.1097/anc.0000000000001198
Kirsten M Lepp,Brigit M Carter,Lisa C Bain,Rachael E Antonini
{"title":"Umbilical Line Securement Bundle to Reduce Line Loss in the Neonate.","authors":"Kirsten M Lepp,Brigit M Carter,Lisa C Bain,Rachael E Antonini","doi":"10.1097/anc.0000000000001198","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nUmbilical line migration not only increases the risks of complications but also results in malposition and, ultimately, loss of the umbilical line.\r\n\r\nPURPOSE\r\nTo evaluate the use of an umbilical line securement bundle to reduce unintended line discontinuation after line adjustment in the neonate at a single 40-bed Level IV neonatal intensive care unit.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nA pre-post design of 75 neonates, preimplementation (n = 50) and postimplementation (n = 25), was analyzed using data collection from the electronic health record.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nThere was a 37.5% absolute reduction in removal of the umbilical line due to malposition after line adjustment utilizing the umbilical line bundle, standardizing the adjustment order, nursing process, and follow-up x-ray evaluation. This absolute reduction has clinical significance although not statistically significant. Provider compliance rates with line adjustment order bundle were 75%, decreasing with additional adjustments (50%). Nursing staff reported comfort with umbilical line management, ranging from 63% to 87% on different tasks.\r\n\r\nIMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE\r\nThe use of umbilical line bundles reduces rates of line discontinuation due to malposition. The adoption of umbilical line bundles in neonatal intensive care unit practice may help to prevent unintended line discontinuation.\r\n\r\nIMPLICATIONS FOR RESEARCH\r\nThere is a need for continued research regarding the use of secondary securement devices for decreased rate of malposition and the timing and methods for surveillance of umbilical line position.","PeriodicalId":48862,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Neonatal Care","volume":"46 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Neonatal Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/anc.0000000000001198","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND Umbilical line migration not only increases the risks of complications but also results in malposition and, ultimately, loss of the umbilical line. PURPOSE To evaluate the use of an umbilical line securement bundle to reduce unintended line discontinuation after line adjustment in the neonate at a single 40-bed Level IV neonatal intensive care unit. METHODS A pre-post design of 75 neonates, preimplementation (n = 50) and postimplementation (n = 25), was analyzed using data collection from the electronic health record. RESULTS There was a 37.5% absolute reduction in removal of the umbilical line due to malposition after line adjustment utilizing the umbilical line bundle, standardizing the adjustment order, nursing process, and follow-up x-ray evaluation. This absolute reduction has clinical significance although not statistically significant. Provider compliance rates with line adjustment order bundle were 75%, decreasing with additional adjustments (50%). Nursing staff reported comfort with umbilical line management, ranging from 63% to 87% on different tasks. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE The use of umbilical line bundles reduces rates of line discontinuation due to malposition. The adoption of umbilical line bundles in neonatal intensive care unit practice may help to prevent unintended line discontinuation. IMPLICATIONS FOR RESEARCH There is a need for continued research regarding the use of secondary securement devices for decreased rate of malposition and the timing and methods for surveillance of umbilical line position.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于减少新生儿脐带脱落的脐带固定捆绑装置。
背景脐带管线移位不仅会增加并发症的风险,还会导致位置不正,最终导致脐带管线脱落。目的在一家拥有 40 张床位的 IV 级新生儿重症监护病房评估脐带管线固定捆绑包的使用情况,以减少新生儿在管线调整后意外中断脐带管线的情况。结果使用脐带管束、标准化调整顺序、护理流程和随访 X 光评估后,因脐带管位置不正而拔除脐带管的情况绝对减少了 37.5%。虽然没有统计学意义,但这一绝对值的降低具有临床意义。医护人员对脐带管路调整医嘱捆绑包的遵从率为 75%,随着调整次数的增加,遵从率有所下降(50%)。护理人员对脐带管路管理的满意度从 63% 到 87% 不等。在新生儿重症监护室实践中采用脐带管束可能有助于防止意外的脐带管中断。研究意义需要继续研究使用辅助固定装置以降低错位率,以及监测脐带管位置的时机和方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
5.90%
发文量
101
期刊介绍: Advances in Neonatal Care takes a unique and dynamic approach to the original research and clinical practice articles it publishes. Addressing the practice challenges faced every day—caring for the 40,000-plus low-birth-weight infants in Level II and Level III NICUs each year—the journal promotes evidence-based care and improved outcomes for the tiniest patients and their families. Peer-reviewed editorial includes unique and detailed visual and teaching aids, such as Family Teaching Toolbox, Research to Practice, Cultivating Clinical Expertise, and Online Features. Each issue offers Continuing Education (CE) articles in both print and online formats.
期刊最新文献
Attitudes and Experiences Among Swedish NICU Nurses Regarding Skin-to-Skin Care of Infants Born at 22-23 Weeks of Gestation. Eyedealistic Vision: Optimizing Oxygenation to Reduce Severe Retinopathy of Prematurity in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit. The Impact of Pandemic-Induced Separation and Visitation Restrictions on the Maternal-Infant Dyad in Neonatal Units: A Systematic Review. The Role of Neonatal Nurse Practitioners in the Implementation of a Bedside Point-of-Care Ultrasound Program. Initial Development of the Nurse Perception of Infant Condition (NPIC) Scale.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1