The Intersection of Socioeconomic Differences and Sex in the Management and Outcomes of Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Nationwide Cohort Study.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Angiology Pub Date : 2024-09-19 DOI:10.1177/00033197241273433
Nicholas Weight,Saadiq Moledina,Claire A Lawson,Harriette G C Van Spall,Harindra C Wijeysundera,Muhammad Rashid,Evangelos Kontopantelis,Mamas A Mamas
{"title":"The Intersection of Socioeconomic Differences and Sex in the Management and Outcomes of Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Nationwide Cohort Study.","authors":"Nicholas Weight,Saadiq Moledina,Claire A Lawson,Harriette G C Van Spall,Harindra C Wijeysundera,Muhammad Rashid,Evangelos Kontopantelis,Mamas A Mamas","doi":"10.1177/00033197241273433","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Patients with lower socioeconomic status (SES) have poorer outcomes following acute myocardial infarction (AMI) than patients with higher SES; however, how sex modifies socioeconomic differences is unclear. Using the United Kingdom (UK) Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project (MINAP) registry, alongside Office of National Statistics (ONS) mortality data, we analyzed 736,420 AMI patients between 2005 and 2018, stratified by Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) score Quintiles (most affluent [Q1] to most deprived [Q5]). There was no significant difference in probability of in-hospital mortality in our adjusted model according to sex. The probability of 30-day mortality in our adjusted model was similar between men and women throughout Quintiles, ((Q5; Men 7.6%; 95% CI 7.3-7.8% (P < .001), Women; 7.0%; 95% CI 6.8-7.3%, P < .001)) ((Q1; Men 7.1%; 95% CI 6.8-7.4%, P < .001, Women; 6.9%; 95% CI 6.6-7.1%, P < .001)). The probability of one-year mortality in our adjusted model was higher in men throughout all Quintiles (Q1; Men 15.0%; 95% CI 14.8-15.6%), P < .001, Women; 14.5%; 95% CI 14.2-14.9%, P < .001) (Q5; Men 16.9%; 95% CI 16.5-17.3%, P < .001, Women; 15.5%; 95% CI 15.1-15.9 by %, P < .001). Overall, female sex did not significantly influence the effect of deprivation on AMI processes of care and outcomes.","PeriodicalId":8264,"journal":{"name":"Angiology","volume":"100 1","pages":"33197241273433"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Angiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00033197241273433","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Patients with lower socioeconomic status (SES) have poorer outcomes following acute myocardial infarction (AMI) than patients with higher SES; however, how sex modifies socioeconomic differences is unclear. Using the United Kingdom (UK) Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project (MINAP) registry, alongside Office of National Statistics (ONS) mortality data, we analyzed 736,420 AMI patients between 2005 and 2018, stratified by Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) score Quintiles (most affluent [Q1] to most deprived [Q5]). There was no significant difference in probability of in-hospital mortality in our adjusted model according to sex. The probability of 30-day mortality in our adjusted model was similar between men and women throughout Quintiles, ((Q5; Men 7.6%; 95% CI 7.3-7.8% (P < .001), Women; 7.0%; 95% CI 6.8-7.3%, P < .001)) ((Q1; Men 7.1%; 95% CI 6.8-7.4%, P < .001, Women; 6.9%; 95% CI 6.6-7.1%, P < .001)). The probability of one-year mortality in our adjusted model was higher in men throughout all Quintiles (Q1; Men 15.0%; 95% CI 14.8-15.6%), P < .001, Women; 14.5%; 95% CI 14.2-14.9%, P < .001) (Q5; Men 16.9%; 95% CI 16.5-17.3%, P < .001, Women; 15.5%; 95% CI 15.1-15.9 by %, P < .001). Overall, female sex did not significantly influence the effect of deprivation on AMI processes of care and outcomes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急性心肌梗死的管理和预后中社会经济差异与性别的交叉:全国队列研究
与社会经济地位较高的患者相比,社会经济地位较低的患者在急性心肌梗死(AMI)后的预后较差;然而,性别如何改变社会经济差异尚不清楚。我们利用英国心肌缺血国家审计项目(MINAP)登记册和英国国家统计局(ONS)的死亡率数据,对2005年至2018年间的736420名急性心肌梗死患者进行了分析,并按多重贫困指数(IMD)五分法(最富裕[Q1]至最贫困[Q5])进行了分层。在我们的调整模型中,院内死亡概率与性别无明显差异。在我们的调整模型中,男性和女性在整个五分位数中的30天死亡率概率相似((Q5;男性7.6%;95% CI 7.3-7.8% (P < .001),女性7.0%;95% CI 6.8-7.3%, P < .001))((Q1;男性7.1%;95% CI 6.8-7.4%, P < .001,女性6.9%;95% CI 6.6-7.1%, P < .001))。在我们的调整模型中,男性在所有五分位数中的一年期死亡率均较高(Q1;男性 15.0%;95% CI 14.8-15.6%,P < .001,女性 14.5%;95% CI 14.2-14.9%,P < .001)(Q5;男性 16.9%;95% CI 16.5-17.3%,P < .001,女性 15.5%;95% CI 15.1-15.9%,P < .001)。总体而言,女性性别对贫困对急性心肌梗死护理过程和结果的影响没有明显影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Angiology
Angiology 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
14.30%
发文量
180
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: A presentation of original, peer-reviewed original articles, review and case reports relative to all phases of all vascular diseases, Angiology (ANG) offers more than a typical cardiology journal. With approximately 1000 pages per year covering diagnostic methods, therapeutic approaches, and clinical and laboratory research, ANG is among the most informative publications in the field of peripheral vascular and cardiovascular diseases. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Average time from submission to first decision: 13 days
期刊最新文献
Associations Between GGT/ALT Ratio and Carotid Plaque in Inpatients With Coronary Artery Disease: A RCSCD-TCM Study. Relationships Between Inflammatory Parameters Derived From Complete Blood Count and Quantitative Flow Ratio in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease. Managing Congenital Heart Defects in Elderly: The Platypnea-Orthodeoxia Syndrome in Underestimated Patent Foramen Ovale. Atherosclerosis Associated With COVID-19: Acute, Tends to Severely Involve Peripheral Arteries, and May be Reversible. Clinical Outcomes of Patients With Cholesterol Crystal Embolism Accompanied by Lower Extremity Wound.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1