Effects of Health Technology Use and Digital Health Engagement on Clinical Trial Participation: Findings from the Health Information National Trends Survey

Nicholas C Peiper, Stephen Furmanek, Kelly C McCants, Edward Hoyt Brown
{"title":"Effects of Health Technology Use and Digital Health Engagement on Clinical Trial Participation: Findings from the Health Information National Trends Survey","authors":"Nicholas C Peiper, Stephen Furmanek, Kelly C McCants, Edward Hoyt Brown","doi":"10.1101/2024.09.13.24312295","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Clinical trials are critical to scientific advances and medical progress, although awareness and participation remain low in general populations. The existing literature indicates that clinical trial knowledge and participation is multifactorial. Yet, little is known about the association between clinical trial participation with health technology use and digital health engagement to search for health information, interact with medical providers, and seek health supports. Objective: Examine the multivariate association between clinical trial knowledge and participation with past-year health technology use and digital health engagement with medical providers. Design: Cross-sectional data from a federal surveillance system. Participants: A total of 3,865 US adult respondents from the Health Information National Trends Survey 5, Cycle 4 conducted in 2020. Main Measures: The two outcomes were clinical trial knowledge (no knowledge, a little knowledge, a lot of knowledge) and participation (never invited, invited did not participate, invited and participated). There were four binary indicators of health technology use for the following purposes in the past year: searching for health or medical information, communicating with a doctors office, looking up medical test results, and making medical appointments. There were four binary indicators of digital health engagement in the past year: sharing health information on social media, participating in a health forum or support group, watching health-related videos on YouTube, and awareness of ClinicalTrials.gov. Key Results: Survey-weighted multivariate regression models demonstrated that awareness of ClinicalTrials.gov had the largest associations with clinical trial knowledge and participation. Digital technology use to engage with medical providers and electronic health records was associated with clinical participation, although the vast majority of respondents had never been invited. Conclusions: Findings from this study can inform the design of large-scale digital health campaigns and quality improvement programs focused on increasing clinical trial participation.","PeriodicalId":501071,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Epidemiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.13.24312295","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Clinical trials are critical to scientific advances and medical progress, although awareness and participation remain low in general populations. The existing literature indicates that clinical trial knowledge and participation is multifactorial. Yet, little is known about the association between clinical trial participation with health technology use and digital health engagement to search for health information, interact with medical providers, and seek health supports. Objective: Examine the multivariate association between clinical trial knowledge and participation with past-year health technology use and digital health engagement with medical providers. Design: Cross-sectional data from a federal surveillance system. Participants: A total of 3,865 US adult respondents from the Health Information National Trends Survey 5, Cycle 4 conducted in 2020. Main Measures: The two outcomes were clinical trial knowledge (no knowledge, a little knowledge, a lot of knowledge) and participation (never invited, invited did not participate, invited and participated). There were four binary indicators of health technology use for the following purposes in the past year: searching for health or medical information, communicating with a doctors office, looking up medical test results, and making medical appointments. There were four binary indicators of digital health engagement in the past year: sharing health information on social media, participating in a health forum or support group, watching health-related videos on YouTube, and awareness of ClinicalTrials.gov. Key Results: Survey-weighted multivariate regression models demonstrated that awareness of ClinicalTrials.gov had the largest associations with clinical trial knowledge and participation. Digital technology use to engage with medical providers and electronic health records was associated with clinical participation, although the vast majority of respondents had never been invited. Conclusions: Findings from this study can inform the design of large-scale digital health campaigns and quality improvement programs focused on increasing clinical trial participation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医疗技术使用和数字医疗参与对临床试验参与的影响:全国健康信息趋势调查的结果
背景:临床试验对科学进步和医学发展至关重要,但普通人群对临床试验的认知度和参与度仍然很低。现有文献表明,临床试验知识和参与是多因素的。然而,人们对临床试验的参与与健康技术的使用以及搜索健康信息、与医疗服务提供者互动和寻求健康支持的数字健康参与之间的关系知之甚少。研究目的研究临床试验知识和参与度与过去一年健康技术使用情况以及与医疗服务提供者的数字健康互动之间的多变量关联。设计:来自联邦监测系统的横断面数据。参试者2020年进行的第五次全国健康信息趋势调查(Health Information National Trends Survey 5)第4周期的3865名美国成人受访者。主要测量指标:两个结果是临床试验知识(不了解、略有了解、非常了解)和参与情况(从未受邀、受邀未参与、受邀并参与)。在过去一年中,健康技术的使用有四个二进制指标:搜索健康或医疗信息、与医生办公室沟通、查询医疗检查结果和预约就诊。在过去一年中,数字健康参与度有四个二进制指标:在社交媒体上分享健康信息、参加健康论坛或支持小组、在 YouTube 上观看健康相关视频以及了解 ClinicalTrials.gov。主要结果调查加权多元回归模型表明,ClinicalTrials.gov 的认知度与临床试验知识和参与度的关联度最大。使用数字技术与医疗服务提供者和电子健康记录互动与临床参与相关,尽管绝大多数受访者从未收到过邀请。结论:这项研究的结果可为设计大规模数字健康活动和质量改进计划提供参考,这些活动和计划的重点是提高临床试验的参与率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Climate Change and Malaria: A Call for Robust Analytics Female Infertility and Neurodevelopmental Disorders in Children: associations and evidence for familial confounding in Denmark Surveillance and control of neglected zoonotic diseases: methodological approaches to studying Rift Valley Fever, Crimean-Congo Haemorrhagic Fever and Brucellosis at the human-livestock-wildlife interface across diverse agricultural systems in Uganda Climate variation and serotype competition drive dengue outbreak dynamics in Singapore Leveraging an Online Dashboard to Inform on Infectious Disease Surveillance: A case Study of COVID-19 in Kenya.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1