A cost comparison of GLP-1 receptor agonists and bariatric surgery: what is the break even point?

Salvatore Docimo, Jay Shah, Gus Warren, Samer Ganam, Joseph Sujka, Christopher DuCoin
{"title":"A cost comparison of GLP-1 receptor agonists and bariatric surgery: what is the break even point?","authors":"Salvatore Docimo, Jay Shah, Gus Warren, Samer Ganam, Joseph Sujka, Christopher DuCoin","doi":"10.1007/s00464-024-11191-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background</h3><p>With the prevalence of obesity rising in the US, medical management is of increasing importance. Two popular options for the treatment of obesity are bariatric surgery (e.g. sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass) and the increasingly popular GLP-1 Receptor Agonists (GLP-1 s). This study examines the initial and long-term costs of GLP-1 s compared to bariatric surgery.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Study design</h3><p>We compared average 2023 national retail prices for GLP-1 s to surgical cost estimates from 2015 adjusted for inflation. We then plotted the cumulative medication cost over time against the flat cost of each surgery, thus calculating \"break-even points\" (when medication costs equal surgery costs). The findings revealed a crucial insight, for some GLP-1 s like Saxenda and Wegovy, the high cost of ongoing use surpasses the cost of RYGB in less than a year and sleeve gastrectomy within nine months. Even the most affordable option, Byetta, becomes costlier than surgery after around 1.5 years.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>This highlights the importance of looking beyond the initial financial investment when considering cost-effectiveness. Additionally, while not directly assessed, this study acknowledges that GLP-1 s take time to reach full effectiveness, potentially delaying weight loss while accumulating costs. Concerns also exist about weight regain after discontinuing the medication.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>This study is limited by the real-world variation for individual treatment costs (e.g. insurance), a limited evaluation of long-term costs associated with either treatment modality and their co-morbidities, and the reality of patient preference providing subjective value to either modality. Overall, the study offers insights into the financial trade-offs between GLP-1 s and bariatric surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":501625,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Endoscopy","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-024-11191-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

With the prevalence of obesity rising in the US, medical management is of increasing importance. Two popular options for the treatment of obesity are bariatric surgery (e.g. sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass) and the increasingly popular GLP-1 Receptor Agonists (GLP-1 s). This study examines the initial and long-term costs of GLP-1 s compared to bariatric surgery.

Study design

We compared average 2023 national retail prices for GLP-1 s to surgical cost estimates from 2015 adjusted for inflation. We then plotted the cumulative medication cost over time against the flat cost of each surgery, thus calculating "break-even points" (when medication costs equal surgery costs). The findings revealed a crucial insight, for some GLP-1 s like Saxenda and Wegovy, the high cost of ongoing use surpasses the cost of RYGB in less than a year and sleeve gastrectomy within nine months. Even the most affordable option, Byetta, becomes costlier than surgery after around 1.5 years.

Results

This highlights the importance of looking beyond the initial financial investment when considering cost-effectiveness. Additionally, while not directly assessed, this study acknowledges that GLP-1 s take time to reach full effectiveness, potentially delaying weight loss while accumulating costs. Concerns also exist about weight regain after discontinuing the medication.

Conclusion

This study is limited by the real-world variation for individual treatment costs (e.g. insurance), a limited evaluation of long-term costs associated with either treatment modality and their co-morbidities, and the reality of patient preference providing subjective value to either modality. Overall, the study offers insights into the financial trade-offs between GLP-1 s and bariatric surgery.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
GLP-1 受体激动剂和减肥手术的成本比较:什么是收支平衡点?
背景随着美国肥胖症发病率的上升,医疗管理的重要性日益凸显。治疗肥胖症的两种常用方法是减肥手术(如袖状胃切除术和 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术)和日益流行的 GLP-1 受体激动剂(GLP-1 s)。本研究探讨了 GLP-1 s 与减肥手术相比的初始成本和长期成本。研究设计我们将 2023 年 GLP-1 s 的全国平均零售价与 2015 年根据通货膨胀调整后的手术成本估算值进行了比较。然后,我们将一段时间内的累计药物成本与每项手术的固定成本进行对比,从而计算出 "盈亏平衡点"(当药物成本与手术成本相等时)。研究结果揭示了一个重要的观点:对于某些 GLP-1 药物,如 Saxenda 和 Wegovy,持续使用的高昂费用在不到一年的时间内就超过了 RYGB 的费用,而袖状胃切除术的费用则在九个月内就超过了 RYGB 的费用。即使是最经济实惠的方案 Byetta,在使用约 1.5 年后,其成本也会超过手术费用。结果这凸显了在考虑成本效益时,将目光投向初始经济投资之外的重要性。此外,虽然没有进行直接评估,但这项研究承认,GLP-1 需要一段时间才能充分发挥疗效,这可能会在累积成本的同时推迟体重减轻。结论这项研究受到以下因素的限制:现实世界中个人治疗成本的差异(如保险)、对两种治疗方式及其并发症相关长期成本的评估有限,以及患者对两种治疗方式主观价值的偏好。总之,该研究为 GLP-1s 和减肥手术之间的经济权衡提供了见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Short-term gut microbiota’s shift after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y vs one anastomosis gastric bypass: results of a multicenter randomized control trial Classifying frailty in the ventral hernia population Retrospective study on endoscopic treatment of recurrent esophageal cancer patients after radiotherapy State of the art medical devices for fluorescence-guided surgery (FGS): technical review and future developments Conquering the common bile duct: outcomes in minimally invasive transcystic common bile duct exploration versus ERCP
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1