Comparative anatomic and symptomatic recurrence outcomes of diaphragmatic suture cruroplasty versus biosynthetic mesh reinforcement in robotic hiatal and paraesophageal hernia repair

Niloufar Salehi, Teagan Marshall, Blake Christianson, Hala Al Asadi, Haythem Najah, Yeon Joo Lee-Saxton, Abhinay Tumati, Parima Safe, Alexander Gavlin, Manjil Chatterji, Brendan M. Finnerty, Thomas J. Fahey, Rasa Zarnegar
{"title":"Comparative anatomic and symptomatic recurrence outcomes of diaphragmatic suture cruroplasty versus biosynthetic mesh reinforcement in robotic hiatal and paraesophageal hernia repair","authors":"Niloufar Salehi, Teagan Marshall, Blake Christianson, Hala Al Asadi, Haythem Najah, Yeon Joo Lee-Saxton, Abhinay Tumati, Parima Safe, Alexander Gavlin, Manjil Chatterji, Brendan M. Finnerty, Thomas J. Fahey, Rasa Zarnegar","doi":"10.1007/s00464-024-11257-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background</h3><p>Hiatal and paraesophageal hernia (HH/PEH) recurrence is the most common cause of failure after gastroesophageal anti-reflux surgery. Crural reinforcement with mesh has been suggested to address this issue, but its efficacy remains debated. In this study, we aimed to determine the impact of biosynthetic mesh reinforcement compared to suture cruroplasty on anatomic and symptomatic hernia recurrence.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Method</h3><p>Data of patients who underwent robotic HH/PEH repair with suture cruroplasty with or without biosynthetic mesh reinforcement between January 2012 and April 2024 were retrospectively reviewed. Gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms and anatomic hernia recurrence were assessed at short-term (3 months to 1 year) and longer-term (≥ 1 year) follow-up. Symptomatic hernia recurrence was defined as having both anatomic recurrence and symptoms.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Out of the 503 patients in the study, 308 had undergone biosynthetic mesh repair, while 195 had suture-only repair. After the surgery, both groups demonstrated comparable improvements in symptoms. Short-term anatomic hernia recurrence rates were 11.8% and 15.6% for mesh and suture groups, respectively (<i>p</i> = 0.609), while longer-term rates were 24.7% and 44.9% (<i>p</i> = 0.015). The rates of symptomatic hernia recurrence in the same group were 8.8% and 14.6% in the short-term (<i>p</i> = 0.256), and 17.2% and 42.2% in longer-term follow-ups (<i>p</i> = 0.003). In the repair of medium and large-size hernias, mesh reinforcement resulted in a 50.0% relative risk reduction in anatomic hernia recurrences and a 59.2% reduction in symptomatic hernia recurrences at ≥ 1-year follow-up.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>After more than a year of follow-up, it has been found that using biosynthetic mesh for medium and large hiatal or paraesophageal hernia repair significantly reduces the likelihood of both anatomic and symptomatic recurrence compared to using only suture cruroplasty. These findings strongly support the use of biosynthetic mesh to manage larger hernias. However, further long-term multicenter randomized studies are needed to provide more conclusive evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":501625,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Endoscopy","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-024-11257-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Hiatal and paraesophageal hernia (HH/PEH) recurrence is the most common cause of failure after gastroesophageal anti-reflux surgery. Crural reinforcement with mesh has been suggested to address this issue, but its efficacy remains debated. In this study, we aimed to determine the impact of biosynthetic mesh reinforcement compared to suture cruroplasty on anatomic and symptomatic hernia recurrence.

Method

Data of patients who underwent robotic HH/PEH repair with suture cruroplasty with or without biosynthetic mesh reinforcement between January 2012 and April 2024 were retrospectively reviewed. Gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms and anatomic hernia recurrence were assessed at short-term (3 months to 1 year) and longer-term (≥ 1 year) follow-up. Symptomatic hernia recurrence was defined as having both anatomic recurrence and symptoms.

Results

Out of the 503 patients in the study, 308 had undergone biosynthetic mesh repair, while 195 had suture-only repair. After the surgery, both groups demonstrated comparable improvements in symptoms. Short-term anatomic hernia recurrence rates were 11.8% and 15.6% for mesh and suture groups, respectively (p = 0.609), while longer-term rates were 24.7% and 44.9% (p = 0.015). The rates of symptomatic hernia recurrence in the same group were 8.8% and 14.6% in the short-term (p = 0.256), and 17.2% and 42.2% in longer-term follow-ups (p = 0.003). In the repair of medium and large-size hernias, mesh reinforcement resulted in a 50.0% relative risk reduction in anatomic hernia recurrences and a 59.2% reduction in symptomatic hernia recurrences at ≥ 1-year follow-up.

Conclusion

After more than a year of follow-up, it has been found that using biosynthetic mesh for medium and large hiatal or paraesophageal hernia repair significantly reduces the likelihood of both anatomic and symptomatic recurrence compared to using only suture cruroplasty. These findings strongly support the use of biosynthetic mesh to manage larger hernias. However, further long-term multicenter randomized studies are needed to provide more conclusive evidence.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
机器人食管裂孔疝和食管旁疝修补术中横膈膜缝合环成形术与生物合成网片加固术的解剖和症状复发结果比较
背景食管裂孔和食管旁疝(HH/PEH)复发是胃食管反流手术失败的最常见原因。有人建议用网片加固硬膜来解决这一问题,但其效果仍存在争议。方法回顾性分析了2012年1月至2024年4月期间接受机器人HH/PEH修复术、缝合嵴成形术、生物合成网片加固或未加固的患者数据。在短期(3 个月至 1 年)和长期(≥ 1 年)随访中评估了胃食管反流病症状和解剖疝复发情况。有症状的疝复发被定义为既有解剖复发又有症状。结果在研究的 503 位患者中,308 位接受了生物合成网片修补术,195 位接受了单纯缝合修补术。术后,两组患者的症状改善情况相当。网片组和缝合组的短期解剖疝复发率分别为 11.8% 和 15.6%(P = 0.609),而长期复发率分别为 24.7% 和 44.9%(P = 0.015)。同组的无症状疝复发率短期分别为8.8%和14.6%(p = 0.256),长期随访分别为17.2%和42.2%(p = 0.003)。结论经过一年多的随访发现,在中型和大型食道裂孔疝或食道旁疝修补术中使用生物合成网片与仅使用缝合成形术相比,可显著降低解剖复发和症状复发的可能性。这些研究结果强烈支持使用生物合成网来处理较大的疝气。不过,还需要进一步的长期多中心随机研究来提供更确凿的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Short-term gut microbiota’s shift after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y vs one anastomosis gastric bypass: results of a multicenter randomized control trial Classifying frailty in the ventral hernia population Retrospective study on endoscopic treatment of recurrent esophageal cancer patients after radiotherapy State of the art medical devices for fluorescence-guided surgery (FGS): technical review and future developments Conquering the common bile duct: outcomes in minimally invasive transcystic common bile duct exploration versus ERCP
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1