Do we care? Reporting of genetic diagnoses in multidisciplinary intellectual disability care: a retrospective chart review

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 GENETICS & HEREDITY Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases Pub Date : 2024-09-16 DOI:10.1186/s13023-024-03323-6
Annelieke R. Müller, Erik Boot, Stijn B. Notermans, Carlo Schuengel, Lidewij Henneman, Martina C. Cornel, Mieke M. van Haelst, Mariëlle Alders, Clara D. M. van Karnebeek, Bas Bijl, Frits A. Wijburg, Agnies M. van Eeghen
{"title":"Do we care? Reporting of genetic diagnoses in multidisciplinary intellectual disability care: a retrospective chart review","authors":"Annelieke R. Müller, Erik Boot, Stijn B. Notermans, Carlo Schuengel, Lidewij Henneman, Martina C. Cornel, Mieke M. van Haelst, Mariëlle Alders, Clara D. M. van Karnebeek, Bas Bijl, Frits A. Wijburg, Agnies M. van Eeghen","doi":"10.1186/s13023-024-03323-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Advances in understanding the etiology of intellectual disability (ID) has led to insights in potential (targeted) treatments and personalized care. Implications of ID on health are often complex and require a multidisciplinary approach. The aim was to investigate the reporting of genetic diagnoses in multidisciplinary ID care and to identify associated clinical and demographic factors. A retrospective chart review was performed on a randomly selected sample of individuals (n = 380) of a large ID care organization in the Netherlands. Data on genetic etiology, including genetic testing and diagnoses, and clinical and demographic characteristics were collected from files held by multidisciplinary team members. Reports on genetic etiology were available in 40% of the study sample (n = 151), with a genetic diagnosis recorded in 34% (n = 51), which is 13% of the total sample. In those with reported genetic diagnoses, this was reported in 90% of medical, 39% of psychodiagnostic, and 75% of professional caregivers’ files. Older age, mild ID, and the legal representative not being a family member were associated with less reported information on genetic etiology. This study revealed that genetic diagnoses were often not reported in ID care files. Recommendations were formulated to reduce delay in diagnosis, and enable personalized care for individuals with ID.","PeriodicalId":19651,"journal":{"name":"Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13023-024-03323-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Advances in understanding the etiology of intellectual disability (ID) has led to insights in potential (targeted) treatments and personalized care. Implications of ID on health are often complex and require a multidisciplinary approach. The aim was to investigate the reporting of genetic diagnoses in multidisciplinary ID care and to identify associated clinical and demographic factors. A retrospective chart review was performed on a randomly selected sample of individuals (n = 380) of a large ID care organization in the Netherlands. Data on genetic etiology, including genetic testing and diagnoses, and clinical and demographic characteristics were collected from files held by multidisciplinary team members. Reports on genetic etiology were available in 40% of the study sample (n = 151), with a genetic diagnosis recorded in 34% (n = 51), which is 13% of the total sample. In those with reported genetic diagnoses, this was reported in 90% of medical, 39% of psychodiagnostic, and 75% of professional caregivers’ files. Older age, mild ID, and the legal representative not being a family member were associated with less reported information on genetic etiology. This study revealed that genetic diagnoses were often not reported in ID care files. Recommendations were formulated to reduce delay in diagnosis, and enable personalized care for individuals with ID.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
我们关心吗?多学科智障护理中遗传诊断的报告:回顾性病历审查
随着对智障(ID)病因认识的不断深入,人们对潜在的(针对性)治疗和个性化护理有了更深入的了解。智障对健康的影响往往是复杂的,需要采用多学科方法。本研究旨在调查多学科智障护理中遗传诊断的报告情况,并确定相关的临床和人口学因素。我们对荷兰一家大型 ID 医疗机构随机抽取的样本(n = 380)进行了回顾性病历审查。有关遗传病因(包括基因检测和诊断)以及临床和人口特征的数据均来自多学科团队成员的档案。40%的研究样本(n = 151)有遗传病因学报告,34%的样本(n = 51)有遗传学诊断记录,占样本总数的 13%。在有遗传诊断报告的样本中,90%的医疗档案、39%的心理诊断档案和 75%的专业护理人员档案中都有遗传诊断报告。年龄较大、轻度智障、法定代理人不是家庭成员与遗传病因报告信息较少有关。这项研究表明,在智障人士护理档案中往往没有遗传诊断的报告。研究提出了一些建议,以减少诊断延误,并为智障人士提供个性化护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
8.10%
发文量
418
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that encompasses all aspects of rare diseases and orphan drugs. The journal publishes high-quality reviews on specific rare diseases. In addition, the journal may consider articles on clinical trial outcome reports, either positive or negative, and articles on public health issues in the field of rare diseases and orphan drugs. The journal does not accept case reports.
期刊最新文献
Pain, quality of life, and integral management in a cohort of patients diagnosed with hypophosphatasia in Colombia. Molecular analysis of inherited disorders of cornification in polish patients show novel variants and functional data and provokes questions on the significance of secondary findings. PHARC syndrome: an overview. Quality of life and mental health status in caregivers of pediatric patients with nephropathic cystinosis. Study on the disease burden of patients with mucopolysaccharidosis type II in China.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1