Epidemiology, microbiology and antibiotic treatment of bacterial and fungal meningitis among very preterm infants in China: a cross-sectional study

Ping Cheng, Aimin Qian, Hongbo Zhang, Yingying Wang, Shujuan Li, Mengya Sun, Jie Yang, Jianguo Zhou, Liyuan Hu, Xiaoping Lei, Yu Hu, Ligang Zhou, Lizhong Du, Yun Cao, Shoo K Lee, Wenhao Zhou, Wenqing Kang, Changlian Zhu, Huiqing Sun, Siyuan Jiang
{"title":"Epidemiology, microbiology and antibiotic treatment of bacterial and fungal meningitis among very preterm infants in China: a cross-sectional study","authors":"Ping Cheng, Aimin Qian, Hongbo Zhang, Yingying Wang, Shujuan Li, Mengya Sun, Jie Yang, Jianguo Zhou, Liyuan Hu, Xiaoping Lei, Yu Hu, Ligang Zhou, Lizhong Du, Yun Cao, Shoo K Lee, Wenhao Zhou, Wenqing Kang, Changlian Zhu, Huiqing Sun, Siyuan Jiang","doi":"10.1136/archdischild-2024-327495","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective Neonatal meningitis significantly contributes to neonatal morbidity and mortality, yet large-scale epidemiological data in developing countries, particularly among very preterm infants (VPIs), remain sparse. This study aimed to describe the epidemiology of meningitis among VPIs in China. Design Cross-sectional study using the Chinese Neonatal Network database from 2019 to 2021. Setting 79 tertiary neonatal intensive care units in China. Patients Infants with gestational age <32 weeks or birth weight <1500 g. Main outcome measures Incidence, pathogen distribution, antimicrobial use and outcomes of bacterial and fungal meningitis. Results Of 31 915 VPIs admitted, 122 (0.38%) infants were diagnosed with culture-confirmed meningitis, with 14 (11.5%) being early-onset (≤6 days of age) and 108 (88.5%) being late-onset (>6 days of age). The overall in-hospital mortality was 18.0% (22/122). A total of 127 pathogens were identified, among which 63.8% (81/127) were Gram-negative bacteria, 24.4% (31/127) were Gram-positive bacteria and 11.8% (15/127) were fungi. In terms of empirical therapy (on the day of the first lumbar puncture), the most commonly used antibiotic was meropenem (54.9%, 67/122). For definitive therapy (on the sixth day following the first lumbar puncture, 86 cases with available antibiotic data), meropenem (60.3%, 35/58) and vancomycin (57.1%, 16/28) were the most used antibiotics for Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacterial meningitis, respectively. 44% of infants with Gram-positive bacterial meningitis and 52% with Gram-negative bacterial meningitis received antibiotics for more than 3 weeks. Conclusion 0.38% of VPIs in Chinese neonatal intensive care units were diagnosed with meningitis, experiencing significant mortality and inappropriate antibiotic therapy. Gram-negative bacteria were the predominant pathogens, with fungi emerging as a significant cause. Data are available upon reasonable request. After the publication of the article, the corresponding author may offer de-identified data, but this requires the provision of scientific rationale and sound methods. Requests for data sharing will be processed according to the Chinese Neonatal Network’s data-sharing policy.","PeriodicalId":8177,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition","volume":"79 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2024-327495","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective Neonatal meningitis significantly contributes to neonatal morbidity and mortality, yet large-scale epidemiological data in developing countries, particularly among very preterm infants (VPIs), remain sparse. This study aimed to describe the epidemiology of meningitis among VPIs in China. Design Cross-sectional study using the Chinese Neonatal Network database from 2019 to 2021. Setting 79 tertiary neonatal intensive care units in China. Patients Infants with gestational age <32 weeks or birth weight <1500 g. Main outcome measures Incidence, pathogen distribution, antimicrobial use and outcomes of bacterial and fungal meningitis. Results Of 31 915 VPIs admitted, 122 (0.38%) infants were diagnosed with culture-confirmed meningitis, with 14 (11.5%) being early-onset (≤6 days of age) and 108 (88.5%) being late-onset (>6 days of age). The overall in-hospital mortality was 18.0% (22/122). A total of 127 pathogens were identified, among which 63.8% (81/127) were Gram-negative bacteria, 24.4% (31/127) were Gram-positive bacteria and 11.8% (15/127) were fungi. In terms of empirical therapy (on the day of the first lumbar puncture), the most commonly used antibiotic was meropenem (54.9%, 67/122). For definitive therapy (on the sixth day following the first lumbar puncture, 86 cases with available antibiotic data), meropenem (60.3%, 35/58) and vancomycin (57.1%, 16/28) were the most used antibiotics for Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacterial meningitis, respectively. 44% of infants with Gram-positive bacterial meningitis and 52% with Gram-negative bacterial meningitis received antibiotics for more than 3 weeks. Conclusion 0.38% of VPIs in Chinese neonatal intensive care units were diagnosed with meningitis, experiencing significant mortality and inappropriate antibiotic therapy. Gram-negative bacteria were the predominant pathogens, with fungi emerging as a significant cause. Data are available upon reasonable request. After the publication of the article, the corresponding author may offer de-identified data, but this requires the provision of scientific rationale and sound methods. Requests for data sharing will be processed according to the Chinese Neonatal Network’s data-sharing policy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中国早产儿细菌性和真菌性脑膜炎的流行病学、微生物学和抗生素治疗:一项横断面研究
目的 新生儿脑膜炎是导致新生儿发病率和死亡率的重要原因之一,但发展中国家的大规模流行病学数据,尤其是早产儿(VPI)的数据仍然很少。本研究旨在描述中国极早产儿脑膜炎的流行病学。设计 利用2019年至2021年中国新生儿网络数据库进行横断面研究。地点 中国79家三级新生儿重症监护病房。患者 胎龄 6 天的婴儿)。院内总死亡率为18.0%(22/122)。共鉴定出 127 种病原体,其中 63.8%(81/127)为革兰氏阴性菌,24.4%(31/127)为革兰氏阳性菌,11.8%(15/127)为真菌。在经验性治疗方面(首次腰椎穿刺当天),最常用的抗生素是美罗培南(54.9%,67/122)。在确定性治疗中(首次腰椎穿刺后的第六天,86 个有抗生素数据的病例),美罗培南(60.3%,35/58)和万古霉素(57.1%,16/28)分别是治疗革兰氏阴性和革兰氏阳性细菌性脑膜炎最常用的抗生素。44%的革兰氏阳性细菌性脑膜炎患儿和52%的革兰氏阴性细菌性脑膜炎患儿接受抗生素治疗的时间超过3周。结论 中国新生儿重症监护室有 0.38% 的 VPI 被诊断为脑膜炎,死亡率高且抗生素治疗不当。革兰氏阴性菌是主要病原体,真菌也是重要病因。如有合理要求,可提供相关数据。文章发表后,通讯作者可提供去标识化的数据,但这需要提供科学依据和合理的方法。数据共享请求将根据中国新生儿网络的数据共享政策进行处理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
4.50%
发文量
90
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Archives of Disease in Childhood is an international peer review journal that aims to keep paediatricians and others up to date with advances in the diagnosis and treatment of childhood diseases as well as advocacy issues such as child protection. It focuses on all aspects of child health and disease from the perinatal period (in the Fetal and Neonatal edition) through to adolescence. ADC includes original research reports, commentaries, reviews of clinical and policy issues, and evidence reports. Areas covered include: community child health, public health, epidemiology, acute paediatrics, advocacy, and ethics.
期刊最新文献
Impact of visual distraction on neonatal mask ventilation: a simulation-based eye-tracking study. Young adult reflections on life experiences following preterm birth: a cross-sectional descriptive study. Recognising uncertainty: an integrated framework for palliative care in perinatal medicine. Delivery room dextrose gel for preterm hypoglycaemia (the GEHPPI study): a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Effect of an oral stimulation protocol on breastfeeding among preterm infants: a randomised controlled trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1