Assessing innovations for upscaling forest landscape restoration

IF 15.1 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES One Earth Pub Date : 2024-09-20 DOI:10.1016/j.oneear.2024.07.011
Leland K. Werden, Rebecca J. Cole, Katrin Schönhofer, Karen D. Holl, Rakan A. Zahawi, Colin Averill, Daniella Schweizer, Julio C. Calvo-Alvarado, Debra Hamilton, Francis H. Joyce, Miriam San-José, Florian Hofhansl, Lilly Briggs, David Rodríguez, Jeffrey W. Tingle, Fidel Chiriboga, Eben N. Broadbent, Gerald J. Quirós-Cedeño, Thomas W. Crowther
{"title":"Assessing innovations for upscaling forest landscape restoration","authors":"Leland K. Werden, Rebecca J. Cole, Katrin Schönhofer, Karen D. Holl, Rakan A. Zahawi, Colin Averill, Daniella Schweizer, Julio C. Calvo-Alvarado, Debra Hamilton, Francis H. Joyce, Miriam San-José, Florian Hofhansl, Lilly Briggs, David Rodríguez, Jeffrey W. Tingle, Fidel Chiriboga, Eben N. Broadbent, Gerald J. Quirós-Cedeño, Thomas W. Crowther","doi":"10.1016/j.oneear.2024.07.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>There is an increasing urgency to implement large-scale ecosystem restoration to mitigate the biodiversity and climate crises. These efforts must be scaled up to counteract the widespread degradation of the world’s forests, although restoration costs can often limit their application. Thus, there is a pressing need to identify cost-effective approaches that catalyze landscape-scale ecological recovery. Here, we highlight seven assisted restoration innovations with demonstrated local-scale results that, once upscaled, hold promise to rapidly regenerate forests. We comprehensively assessed how each approach facilitated forest, woodland, and/or mangrove recovery across 143 studies. Our results reveal techniques with a marked ability to catalyze vegetation recovery compared to “business-as-usual” approaches. However, the context-dependent cost-benefit ratio and feasibility of applying particular approaches requires careful consideration. Our assessment emphasizes that we already have many of the tools necessary to drive the terrestrial restoration movement forward. It is time to implement and assess their efficacy at scale.</p>","PeriodicalId":52366,"journal":{"name":"One Earth","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":15.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"One Earth","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2024.07.011","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is an increasing urgency to implement large-scale ecosystem restoration to mitigate the biodiversity and climate crises. These efforts must be scaled up to counteract the widespread degradation of the world’s forests, although restoration costs can often limit their application. Thus, there is a pressing need to identify cost-effective approaches that catalyze landscape-scale ecological recovery. Here, we highlight seven assisted restoration innovations with demonstrated local-scale results that, once upscaled, hold promise to rapidly regenerate forests. We comprehensively assessed how each approach facilitated forest, woodland, and/or mangrove recovery across 143 studies. Our results reveal techniques with a marked ability to catalyze vegetation recovery compared to “business-as-usual” approaches. However, the context-dependent cost-benefit ratio and feasibility of applying particular approaches requires careful consideration. Our assessment emphasizes that we already have many of the tools necessary to drive the terrestrial restoration movement forward. It is time to implement and assess their efficacy at scale.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估扩大森林景观恢复规模的创新方法
实施大规模生态系统恢复以缓解生物多样性和气候危机的紧迫性与日俱增。必须加大这些工作的力度,以应对世界森林的普遍退化,但恢复成本往往会限制其应用。因此,迫切需要找到具有成本效益的方法,以促进景观规模的生态恢复。在此,我们重点介绍七种辅助恢复创新方法,这些方法已在当地范围内取得明显成效,一旦推广,有望实现森林的快速再生。我们在 143 项研究中全面评估了每种方法如何促进森林、林地和/或红树林的恢复。我们的研究结果表明,与 "一切照旧 "的方法相比,这些技术具有促进植被恢复的显著能力。然而,应用特定方法的成本效益比和可行性需要根据具体情况慎重考虑。我们的评估强调,我们已经拥有许多推动陆地恢复运动向前发展的必要工具。现在是大规模实施和评估其功效的时候了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
One Earth
One Earth Environmental Science-Environmental Science (all)
CiteScore
18.90
自引率
1.90%
发文量
159
期刊介绍: One Earth, Cell Press' flagship sustainability journal, serves as a platform for high-quality research and perspectives that contribute to a deeper understanding and resolution of contemporary sustainability challenges. With monthly thematic issues, the journal aims to bridge gaps between natural, social, and applied sciences, along with the humanities. One Earth fosters the cross-pollination of ideas, inspiring transformative research to address the complexities of sustainability.
期刊最新文献
Reconciling conservation and development requires enhanced integration and broader aims: A cross-continental assessment of landscape approaches Hope and hype for negative emissions Navigating the obstacles of carbon-negative technologies Scaling biochar solutions for urban carbon dioxide removal Getting real about capturing carbon from the air
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1