Lateral pelvic lymph node positivity (LPLNP) score: predictive clinic-radiological model of lateral pelvic lymph node involvement in rectal cancer patients

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY International Journal of Colorectal Disease Pub Date : 2024-09-18 DOI:10.1007/s00384-024-04717-5
Petr Tsarkov, Vladimir Balaban, Harutyun Babajanyan, Abe Fingerhut, Inna Tulina, Mingze He
{"title":"Lateral pelvic lymph node positivity (LPLNP) score: predictive clinic-radiological model of lateral pelvic lymph node involvement in rectal cancer patients","authors":"Petr Tsarkov, Vladimir Balaban, Harutyun Babajanyan, Abe Fingerhut, Inna Tulina, Mingze He","doi":"10.1007/s00384-024-04717-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Purpose</h3><p>The population in Western countries differs significantly from that in Eastern countries, and the prevalence of lateral pelvic lymph node (LPLN) involvement in Western populations remains largely unknown due to the limited application of LPLN dissection (LPLND). This discrepancy is primarily attributed to the higher body mass index commonly observed in Western populations, which increases the risk of intraoperative complications. Consequently, the aim of this study is to describe a specific Western clinico-radiological selection tool for LPLND, namely, the lateral pelvic lymph node positivity (LPLNP) score.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>This retrospective single center study was designed to elaborate the LPLNP score, which was further tested on a prospective cohort of patients. Clinical and MRI factors associated with LPLN involvement were identified, and logistic regression was used to establish the LPLNP score.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>In the retrospective series, 120 patients underwent lateral pelvic lymph node dissection. After stepwise logistic regression, five parameters were ultimately included in the LPLNP score. When tested on 66 prospectively selected patients, 40 with an LPLNP score &gt; 0.23 (corresponding to the highest sensitivity and specificity) underwent LPLND: 22 patients (55%) had pathologically confirmed positive LPLN. The negative predictive value of the LPLNP score was 96%, with a sensitivity of 95.7% and a specificity of 58.1%.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>The LPLNP score was developed based on the largest group of Western patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. This scoring system demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity during validation on the prospective series, correctly identifying LPLN involvement in 55% of cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":13789,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Colorectal Disease","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Colorectal Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-024-04717-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

The population in Western countries differs significantly from that in Eastern countries, and the prevalence of lateral pelvic lymph node (LPLN) involvement in Western populations remains largely unknown due to the limited application of LPLN dissection (LPLND). This discrepancy is primarily attributed to the higher body mass index commonly observed in Western populations, which increases the risk of intraoperative complications. Consequently, the aim of this study is to describe a specific Western clinico-radiological selection tool for LPLND, namely, the lateral pelvic lymph node positivity (LPLNP) score.

Methods

This retrospective single center study was designed to elaborate the LPLNP score, which was further tested on a prospective cohort of patients. Clinical and MRI factors associated with LPLN involvement were identified, and logistic regression was used to establish the LPLNP score.

Results

In the retrospective series, 120 patients underwent lateral pelvic lymph node dissection. After stepwise logistic regression, five parameters were ultimately included in the LPLNP score. When tested on 66 prospectively selected patients, 40 with an LPLNP score > 0.23 (corresponding to the highest sensitivity and specificity) underwent LPLND: 22 patients (55%) had pathologically confirmed positive LPLN. The negative predictive value of the LPLNP score was 96%, with a sensitivity of 95.7% and a specificity of 58.1%.

Conclusion

The LPLNP score was developed based on the largest group of Western patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. This scoring system demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity during validation on the prospective series, correctly identifying LPLN involvement in 55% of cases.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
盆腔侧淋巴结阳性(LPLNP)评分:直肠癌患者盆腔侧淋巴结受累的临床-放射学预测模型
目的 西方国家的人口与东方国家的人口有很大不同,由于盆腔外侧淋巴结清扫术(LPLND)的应用有限,西方人盆腔外侧淋巴结(LPLN)受累的发生率在很大程度上仍不为人所知。造成这一差异的主要原因是西方人的体重指数普遍较高,这增加了术中并发症的风险。因此,本研究旨在描述一种特定的西方 LPLND 临床放射学选择工具,即盆腔外侧淋巴结阳性率(LPLNP)评分。方法 本回顾性单中心研究旨在详细阐述 LPLNP 评分,并在前瞻性患者队列中进行了进一步测试。结果在回顾性系列研究中,120 名患者接受了盆腔侧淋巴结清扫术。经过逐步逻辑回归,最终有五个参数被纳入 LPLNP 评分。在对 66 名前瞻性筛选出的患者进行测试时,40 名 LPLNP 评分为 0.23(对应最高灵敏度和特异性)的患者接受了 LPLND:22 名患者(55%)经病理证实 LPLN 为阳性。LPLNP 评分的阴性预测值为 96%,灵敏度为 95.7%,特异度为 58.1%。该评分系统在前瞻性系列验证中表现出较高的灵敏度和特异性,能正确识别 55% 的 LPLN 受累病例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
3.60%
发文量
206
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Colorectal Disease, Clinical and Molecular Gastroenterology and Surgery aims to publish novel and state-of-the-art papers which deal with the physiology and pathophysiology of diseases involving the entire gastrointestinal tract. In addition to original research articles, the following categories will be included: reviews (usually commissioned but may also be submitted), case reports, letters to the editor, and protocols on clinical studies. The journal offers its readers an interdisciplinary forum for clinical science and molecular research related to gastrointestinal disease.
期刊最新文献
Analysis of diverting ileostomy for colorectal cancer surgery: stenosis and T4 invasion are risk factors of reoperation due to anastomotic leakage, even when ileostomy is performed. Histological architecture of the intersphincteric region of the anal canal: implications for the anatomical basis of anal fistula pathways. Application of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) programme in elective colorectal resection for diverticular disease: a retrospective propensity score-matched cohort study. Robotic en bloc resection for transverse colon cancer with a malignant colojejunal fistula: a case report. SENP3 drives colorectal cancer progression by enhancing GDF15 expression.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1