Atomoxetine on neurogenic orthostatic hypotension: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Clinical Autonomic Research Pub Date : 2024-09-19 DOI:10.1007/s10286-024-01051-2
Naome Mwesigwa, Patricio Millar Vernetti, Annet Kirabo, Bonnie Black, Tan Ding, Jose Martinez, Jose-Alberto Palma, Italo Biaggioni, Horacio Kaufmann, Cyndya A. Shibao
{"title":"Atomoxetine on neurogenic orthostatic hypotension: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial","authors":"Naome Mwesigwa, Patricio Millar Vernetti, Annet Kirabo, Bonnie Black, Tan Ding, Jose Martinez, Jose-Alberto Palma, Italo Biaggioni, Horacio Kaufmann, Cyndya A. Shibao","doi":"10.1007/s10286-024-01051-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Purpose</h3><p>We previously reported that single doses of the norepinephrine transporter inhibitor, atomoxetine, increased standing blood pressure (BP) and ameliorated symptoms in patients with neurogenic orthostatic hypotension (nOH). We aimed to evaluate the effect of atomoxetine over four weeks in patients with nOH.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover clinical trial between July 2016 and May 2021 was carried out with an initial open-label, single-dose phase (10 or 18 mg atomoxetine), followed by a 1-week wash-out, and a subsequent double-blind 4-week treatment sequence (period 1: atomoxetine followed by placebo) or vice versa (period 2). The trial included a 2-week wash-out period. The primary endpoint was symptoms of nOH as measured by the orthostatic hypotension questionnaire (OHQ) assessed at 2 weeks.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>A total of 68 patients were screened, 40 were randomized, and 37 completed the study. We found no differences in the OHQ composite score between atomoxetine and placebo at 2 weeks (−0.3 ± 1.7 versus −0.4 ± 1.5; <i>P</i> = 0.806) and 4 weeks (−0.6 ± 2.4 versus −0.5 ± 1.6; <i>P</i> = 0.251). There were no differences either in the OHSA scores at 2 weeks (3 ± 1.9 versus 4 ± 2.1; <i>P</i> = 0.062) and at 4 weeks (3 ± 2.2 versus 3 ± 2.0; <i>P</i> = 1.000) or in the OH daily activity scores (OHDAS) at 2 weeks (4 ± 3.0 versus 5 ± 3.1, <i>P</i> = 0.102) and 4 weeks (4 ± 3.0 versus 4 ± 2.7, <i>P</i> = 0.095). Atomoxetine was well-tolerated.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>While previous evidence suggested that acute doses of atomoxetine might be efficacious in treating nOH; results of this clinical trial indicated that it was not superior to placebo to ameliorate symptoms of nOH.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Trial registration</h3><p>ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT02316821.</p>","PeriodicalId":10168,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Autonomic Research","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Autonomic Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10286-024-01051-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

We previously reported that single doses of the norepinephrine transporter inhibitor, atomoxetine, increased standing blood pressure (BP) and ameliorated symptoms in patients with neurogenic orthostatic hypotension (nOH). We aimed to evaluate the effect of atomoxetine over four weeks in patients with nOH.

Methods

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover clinical trial between July 2016 and May 2021 was carried out with an initial open-label, single-dose phase (10 or 18 mg atomoxetine), followed by a 1-week wash-out, and a subsequent double-blind 4-week treatment sequence (period 1: atomoxetine followed by placebo) or vice versa (period 2). The trial included a 2-week wash-out period. The primary endpoint was symptoms of nOH as measured by the orthostatic hypotension questionnaire (OHQ) assessed at 2 weeks.

Results

A total of 68 patients were screened, 40 were randomized, and 37 completed the study. We found no differences in the OHQ composite score between atomoxetine and placebo at 2 weeks (−0.3 ± 1.7 versus −0.4 ± 1.5; P = 0.806) and 4 weeks (−0.6 ± 2.4 versus −0.5 ± 1.6; P = 0.251). There were no differences either in the OHSA scores at 2 weeks (3 ± 1.9 versus 4 ± 2.1; P = 0.062) and at 4 weeks (3 ± 2.2 versus 3 ± 2.0; P = 1.000) or in the OH daily activity scores (OHDAS) at 2 weeks (4 ± 3.0 versus 5 ± 3.1, P = 0.102) and 4 weeks (4 ± 3.0 versus 4 ± 2.7, P = 0.095). Atomoxetine was well-tolerated.

Conclusions

While previous evidence suggested that acute doses of atomoxetine might be efficacious in treating nOH; results of this clinical trial indicated that it was not superior to placebo to ameliorate symptoms of nOH.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT02316821.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阿托莫西汀治疗神经源性正性低血压:随机、双盲、安慰剂对照交叉试验
目的我们曾报道,单剂量去甲肾上腺素转运体抑制剂阿托西汀可增加神经源性正张力性低血压(nOH)患者的站立血压(BP)并改善症状。我们的目的是评估阿托西汀对神经源性正位性低血压患者4周的疗效。方法在2016年7月至2021年5月期间开展了一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照交叉临床试验,初始为开放标签、单剂量阶段(10或18毫克阿托西汀),随后进行1周的冲洗,再进行为期4周的双盲治疗序列(第1期:先用阿托西汀,后用安慰剂),反之亦然(第2期)。试验包括 2 周的停药期。主要终点是在 2 周时通过正压性低血压问卷(OHQ)测量的 nOH 症状。我们发现,阿托西汀和安慰剂在 2 周(-0.3 ± 1.7 对 -0.4 ± 1.5;P = 0.806)和 4 周(-0.6 ± 2.4 对 -0.5 ± 1.6;P = 0.251)时的 OHQ 综合评分没有差异。2周(3±1.9对4±2.1;P=0.062)和4周(3±2.2对3±2.0;P=1.000)的OHSA评分或2周(4±3.0对5±3.1,P=0.102)和4周(4±3.0对4±2.7,P=0.095)的OH日常活动评分(OHDAS)均无差异。结论虽然以前的证据表明急性剂量的阿托莫西汀可能对治疗 nOH 有疗效,但这项临床试验的结果表明,阿托莫西汀在改善 nOH 症状方面并不优于安慰剂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Autonomic Research
Clinical Autonomic Research 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
6.90%
发文量
65
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Autonomic Research aims to draw together and disseminate research work from various disciplines and specialties dealing with clinical problems resulting from autonomic dysfunction. Areas to be covered include: cardiovascular system, neurology, diabetes, endocrinology, urology, pain disorders, ophthalmology, gastroenterology, toxicology and clinical pharmacology, skin infectious diseases, renal disease. This journal is an essential source of new information for everyone working in areas involving the autonomic nervous system. A major feature of Clinical Autonomic Research is its speed of publication coupled with the highest refereeing standards.
期刊最新文献
Comment to the article titled: sympathetic dysfunction as an early indicator of autonomic involvement in Parkinson's disease. Autonomic failure associated with 16p11.2 duplication in two siblings. Adiposity and cardiac autonomic function in children with a family history of obesity. Responses to Valsalva's maneuver in spinal cord injury do not broadly relate to vasoconstrictor capacity. The insular cortex, autonomic asymmetry and cardiovascular control: looking at the right side of stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1