Effectiveness of Horticultural Therapy in Older Patients With Dementia: A Meta‐Analysis Systemic Review

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Journal of Clinical Nursing Pub Date : 2024-09-14 DOI:10.1111/jocn.17444
Min Wang, Ying Qian, Xiaoyun Yu, Yubo Xing
{"title":"Effectiveness of Horticultural Therapy in Older Patients With Dementia: A Meta‐Analysis Systemic Review","authors":"Min Wang, Ying Qian, Xiaoyun Yu, Yubo Xing","doi":"10.1111/jocn.17444","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AimOur study aims to assess the effectiveness of horticultural therapy in improving outcomes in older patients with dementia.DesignA systematic review and meta‐analysis.MethodsThe included studies comprised randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that aimed to assess the effectiveness of horticultural therapy on cognitive function in older patients with dementia. The study design and data extraction were independently conducted by two investigators, who also evaluated the risk of bias using RoB 2.0. The meta‐analysis was carried out using Stata 15.1 software.Data SourcesOn November 2023, we searched relevant English and Chinese publications in PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase, CNKI and Wanfang databases.ResultsThe meta‐analysis included a total of 9 RCTs, involving 655 older patients diagnosed with dementia. The findings from these studies demonstrated that horticultural therapy had a significant positive impact on various aspects of the patients' well‐being when compared to conventional care. Specifically, it was found to improve cognitive function scores, alleviate symptoms of depression, enhance daily activities and enhance overall quality of life. When conducting a subgroup analysis, it was observed that horticultural therapy had a statistically significant effect on cognitive function in older patients with dementia when the intervention frequency was at least two times per week. Furthermore, interventions with a duration of less than 6 months were found to be more effective than those lasting 6 months or longer. Additionally, outdoor horticultural therapy was found to be superior to indoor interventions. Moreover, structured interventions were observed to yield better outcomes compared to non‐structured interventions.ConclusionMore high‐quality studies are needed to further corroborate these findings due to the low quality of the included studies. Horticultural therapy has been found to have a significantly positive impact on the cognitive function, depression status, ADL, and quality of life of older patients with dementia.Implications for the Profession and/or Patient CareWe provide references for non‐pharmacologic treatment of older patients with dementia.What Problem Did the Study Address?This study aimed to measure the efficacy of horticultural therapy in older patients with dementia across four dimensions: cognitive function, depression levels, daily living activities and overall quality of life.What Were the Main Findings?In older patients with dementia, horticultural therapy has been proven to have a significant positive impact on cognitive function, depressive status, activities of daily living and quality of life.Where and on Whom Will the Research Have an Impact?This study will inform non‐pharmacological interventions for older patients with dementia worldwide.Patient or Public ContributionNo Patient or Public Contribution.","PeriodicalId":50236,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.17444","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AimOur study aims to assess the effectiveness of horticultural therapy in improving outcomes in older patients with dementia.DesignA systematic review and meta‐analysis.MethodsThe included studies comprised randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that aimed to assess the effectiveness of horticultural therapy on cognitive function in older patients with dementia. The study design and data extraction were independently conducted by two investigators, who also evaluated the risk of bias using RoB 2.0. The meta‐analysis was carried out using Stata 15.1 software.Data SourcesOn November 2023, we searched relevant English and Chinese publications in PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase, CNKI and Wanfang databases.ResultsThe meta‐analysis included a total of 9 RCTs, involving 655 older patients diagnosed with dementia. The findings from these studies demonstrated that horticultural therapy had a significant positive impact on various aspects of the patients' well‐being when compared to conventional care. Specifically, it was found to improve cognitive function scores, alleviate symptoms of depression, enhance daily activities and enhance overall quality of life. When conducting a subgroup analysis, it was observed that horticultural therapy had a statistically significant effect on cognitive function in older patients with dementia when the intervention frequency was at least two times per week. Furthermore, interventions with a duration of less than 6 months were found to be more effective than those lasting 6 months or longer. Additionally, outdoor horticultural therapy was found to be superior to indoor interventions. Moreover, structured interventions were observed to yield better outcomes compared to non‐structured interventions.ConclusionMore high‐quality studies are needed to further corroborate these findings due to the low quality of the included studies. Horticultural therapy has been found to have a significantly positive impact on the cognitive function, depression status, ADL, and quality of life of older patients with dementia.Implications for the Profession and/or Patient CareWe provide references for non‐pharmacologic treatment of older patients with dementia.What Problem Did the Study Address?This study aimed to measure the efficacy of horticultural therapy in older patients with dementia across four dimensions: cognitive function, depression levels, daily living activities and overall quality of life.What Were the Main Findings?In older patients with dementia, horticultural therapy has been proven to have a significant positive impact on cognitive function, depressive status, activities of daily living and quality of life.Where and on Whom Will the Research Have an Impact?This study will inform non‐pharmacological interventions for older patients with dementia worldwide.Patient or Public ContributionNo Patient or Public Contribution.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
园艺疗法对老年痴呆症患者的疗效:元分析系统综述
方法纳入的研究包括随机对照试验(RCT),旨在评估园艺疗法对老年痴呆症患者认知功能的有效性。研究设计和数据提取由两名研究人员独立完成,他们还使用 RoB 2.0 评估了偏倚风险。数据来源2023年11月,我们在PubMed、Web of Science、Cochrane Library、Embase、CNKI和万方数据库中检索了相关的中英文文献。这些研究结果表明,与传统护理相比,园艺疗法对患者各方面的健康状况都有显著的积极影响。具体来说,研究发现园艺疗法能够改善认知功能评分、缓解抑郁症状、增强日常活动能力并提高整体生活质量。在进行分组分析时发现,当干预频率为每周至少两次时,园艺疗法对老年痴呆症患者认知功能的影响具有统计学意义。此外,还发现持续时间少于 6 个月的干预比持续时间为 6 个月或更长时间的干预更有效。此外,还发现室外园艺疗法优于室内干预。结论 由于纳入的研究质量不高,因此需要更多高质量的研究来进一步证实这些发现。园艺疗法对老年痴呆症患者的认知功能、抑郁状况、日常生活能力和生活质量有显著的积极影响。对行业和/或患者护理的意义我们为老年痴呆症患者的非药物治疗提供了参考。该研究将对哪些地方和哪些人产生影响?该研究将为全球老年痴呆症患者的非药物干预提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
2.40%
发文量
0
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Nursing (JCN) is an international, peer reviewed, scientific journal that seeks to promote the development and exchange of knowledge that is directly relevant to all spheres of nursing practice. The primary aim is to promote a high standard of clinically related scholarship which advances and supports the practice and discipline of nursing. The Journal also aims to promote the international exchange of ideas and experience that draws from the different cultures in which practice takes place. Further, JCN seeks to enrich insight into clinical need and the implications for nursing intervention and models of service delivery. Emphasis is placed on promoting critical debate on the art and science of nursing practice. JCN is essential reading for anyone involved in nursing practice, whether clinicians, researchers, educators, managers, policy makers, or students. The development of clinical practice and the changing patterns of inter-professional working are also central to JCN''s scope of interest. Contributions are welcomed from other health professionals on issues that have a direct impact on nursing practice. We publish high quality papers from across the methodological spectrum that make an important and novel contribution to the field of clinical nursing (regardless of where care is provided), and which demonstrate clinical application and international relevance.
期刊最新文献
'Towards a conceptualization of nurses' support of hospitalised patients' self-management-A modified Delphi study'. "But what do you really think?" Nurses' contrasting explicit and implicit attitudes towards people with disabilities using the implicit association test. Nursing standards, language and age as variables associated with clinical competence for nurses in long-term care facilities: A cross-sectional study. Factors related to nurses' beliefs regarding pain assessment in people living with dementia. Factors related to preoperative anxiety in older patients with sensory impairment: A cross-sectional study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1