Performance of ParaHIT® HRP2-Based Rapid Diagnostic Test and Proportions of Plasmodium falciparum Histidine-Rich Protein 2/3 Gene Deletions in Togo.

Diwaba Carmel Teou,Ameyo Monique Dorkenoo,Essoham Ataba,Kossi Yakpa,Efoe Sossou,Laurence Ma,Emmanuelle Caspar,Manani Hemou,Agueregna Abdou-Kerim,Didier Menard
{"title":"Performance of ParaHIT® HRP2-Based Rapid Diagnostic Test and Proportions of Plasmodium falciparum Histidine-Rich Protein 2/3 Gene Deletions in Togo.","authors":"Diwaba Carmel Teou,Ameyo Monique Dorkenoo,Essoham Ataba,Kossi Yakpa,Efoe Sossou,Laurence Ma,Emmanuelle Caspar,Manani Hemou,Agueregna Abdou-Kerim,Didier Menard","doi":"10.4269/ajtmh.24-0197","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In areas where malaria is endemic and microscopes are unavailable, rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) are essential tools for early diagnosis and prompt and effective treatment. However, HRP2-based RDTs are threatened by the emergence of Plasmodium falciparum parasites that do not carry the pfhrp2 or pfhrp3 gene, leading to false-negative results. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of the ParaHIT RDT together with the proportion of pfhrp2/3 gene-deleted P. falciparum parasites in Togo. The performance of RDTs compared with microscopy and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was determined using capillary blood collected by finger prick during a cross-sectional study conducted from September 2021 to January 2022 in children aged 6-59 months at two sentinel sites. Blood spots were collected for molecular analysis. Amplicons from the target regions (exon 2 of hrp2 and hrp3 genes) were generated by multiplex nested PCR and sequenced using Illumina's MiSeq protocol. A total of 278 samples were analyzed for ParaHIT RDT evaluation. The sensitivity and specificity of the RDT test compared with microscopy were 96.4% and 85.7%, respectively, which increased to 97.9% and 90.7%, respectively, when compared with PCR. Of the microscopically and PCR-positive P. falciparum samples, 138 were sequenced to detect pfhrp2/3 deletions. None of the parasites had a single pfhrp2 deletion or a single pfhrp3 deletion. The ParaHIT RDT demonstrated an acceptable level of performance in this evaluation, confirming the use of HRP2-based RDTs for the detection of P. falciparum infection in areas where microscopy is not available in Togo.","PeriodicalId":520106,"journal":{"name":"The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.24-0197","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In areas where malaria is endemic and microscopes are unavailable, rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) are essential tools for early diagnosis and prompt and effective treatment. However, HRP2-based RDTs are threatened by the emergence of Plasmodium falciparum parasites that do not carry the pfhrp2 or pfhrp3 gene, leading to false-negative results. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of the ParaHIT RDT together with the proportion of pfhrp2/3 gene-deleted P. falciparum parasites in Togo. The performance of RDTs compared with microscopy and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was determined using capillary blood collected by finger prick during a cross-sectional study conducted from September 2021 to January 2022 in children aged 6-59 months at two sentinel sites. Blood spots were collected for molecular analysis. Amplicons from the target regions (exon 2 of hrp2 and hrp3 genes) were generated by multiplex nested PCR and sequenced using Illumina's MiSeq protocol. A total of 278 samples were analyzed for ParaHIT RDT evaluation. The sensitivity and specificity of the RDT test compared with microscopy were 96.4% and 85.7%, respectively, which increased to 97.9% and 90.7%, respectively, when compared with PCR. Of the microscopically and PCR-positive P. falciparum samples, 138 were sequenced to detect pfhrp2/3 deletions. None of the parasites had a single pfhrp2 deletion or a single pfhrp3 deletion. The ParaHIT RDT demonstrated an acceptable level of performance in this evaluation, confirming the use of HRP2-based RDTs for the detection of P. falciparum infection in areas where microscopy is not available in Togo.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于 ParaHIT® HRP2 的快速诊断检测的性能和多哥恶性疟原虫组氨酸富集蛋白 2/3 基因缺失的比例。
在疟疾流行和显微镜缺乏的地区,快速诊断检测(RDT)是早期诊断和及时有效治疗的重要工具。然而,由于恶性疟原虫寄生虫不携带 pfhrp2 或 pfhrp3 基因,导致假阴性结果的出现,基于 HRP2 的快速诊断检测受到威胁。因此,本研究旨在评估 ParaHIT RDT 的性能以及多哥 pfhrp2/3 基因缺失的恶性疟原虫寄生虫的比例。2021 年 9 月至 2022 年 1 月,在两个哨点对 6-59 个月大的儿童进行了横断面研究,通过刺破手指采集毛细血管血,测定了 RDT 与显微镜和聚合酶链反应(PCR)的性能比较。采集的血样用于分子分析。目标区域(hrp2 和 hrp3 基因的外显子 2)的扩增子通过多重嵌套 PCR 生成,并使用 Illumina 的 MiSeq 协议进行测序。共对 278 份样本进行了 ParaHIT RDT 评估分析。与显微镜检测相比,RDT 检测的灵敏度和特异性分别为 96.4% 和 85.7%,与 PCR 检测相比,灵敏度和特异性分别提高到 97.9% 和 90.7%。在显微镜和 PCR 阳性的恶性疟原虫样本中,138 份样本进行了测序,以检测 pfhrp2/3 缺失。没有一个寄生虫出现单个 pfhrp2 缺失或单个 pfhrp3 缺失。在这项评估中,ParaHIT RDT 的性能达到了可接受的水平,证实了在多哥没有显微镜的地区,可以使用基于 HRP2 的 RDT 检测恶性疟原虫感染。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Case Report: A Case of Sporotrichoid Cutaneous Leishmaniasis Caused by Leishmania (Viannia) peruviana. Changes in Access to Alcohol-Based Hand Rub and Hand Hygiene Adherence among Healthcare Workers after a Hand Rub Production and Distribution Program in Rural Uganda before and during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Training of Field-Workers for Rapid Assessment of Scabies Prevalence: A Diagnostic Accuracy Study in Mozambique. Antimicrobial Resistance in Bacterial Species Causing Orthopaedic Surgical Site Infections at a National Trauma Center, Kathmandu, Nepal. Paradoxical Reaction to Tuberculosis Therapy among HIV-Negative Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1