Deep Learning-Based Denoising Enables High-Quality, Fully Diagnostic Neuroradiological Trauma CT at 25% Radiation Dose.

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Academic Radiology Pub Date : 2024-09-17 DOI:10.1016/j.acra.2024.08.018
Georg Gohla,Arne Estler,Leonie Zerweck,Jessica Knoppik,Christer Ruff,Sebastian Werner,Konstantin Nikolaou,Ulrike Ernemann,Saif Afat,Andreas Brendlin
{"title":"Deep Learning-Based Denoising Enables High-Quality, Fully Diagnostic Neuroradiological Trauma CT at 25% Radiation Dose.","authors":"Georg Gohla,Arne Estler,Leonie Zerweck,Jessica Knoppik,Christer Ruff,Sebastian Werner,Konstantin Nikolaou,Ulrike Ernemann,Saif Afat,Andreas Brendlin","doi":"10.1016/j.acra.2024.08.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES\r\nTraumatic neuroradiological emergencies necessitate rapid and accurate diagnosis, often relying on computed tomography (CT). However, the associated ionizing radiation poses long-term risks. Modern artificial intelligence reconstruction algorithms have shown promise in reducing radiation dose while maintaining image quality. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the dose reduction capabilities of a deep learning-based denoising (DLD) algorithm in traumatic neuroradiological emergency CT scans.\r\n\r\nMATERIALS AND METHODS\r\nThis retrospective single-center study included 100 patients with neuroradiological trauma CT scans. Full-dose (100%) and low-dose (25%) simulated scans were processed using iterative reconstruction (IR2) and DLD. Subjective and objective image quality assessments were performed by four neuroradiologists alongside clinical endpoint analysis. Bayesian sensitivity and specificity were computed with 95% credible intervals.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nSubjective analysis showed superior scores for 100% DLD compared to 100% IR2 and 25% IR2 (p < 0.001). No significant differences were observed between 25% DLD and 100% IR2. Objective analysis revealed no significant CT value differences but higher noise at 25% dose for DLD and IR2 compared to 100% (p < 0.001). DLD exhibited lower noise than IR2 at both dose levels (p < 0.001). Clinical endpoint analysis indicated equivalence to 100% IR2 in fracture detection for all datasets, with sensitivity losses in hemorrhage detection at 25% IR2. DLD (25% and 100%) maintained comparable sensitivity to 100% IR2. All comparisons demonstrated robust specificity.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nThe evaluated algorithm enables high-quality, fully diagnostic CT scans at 25% of the initial radiation dose and improves patient care by reducing unnecessary radiation exposure.","PeriodicalId":50928,"journal":{"name":"Academic Radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2024.08.018","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES Traumatic neuroradiological emergencies necessitate rapid and accurate diagnosis, often relying on computed tomography (CT). However, the associated ionizing radiation poses long-term risks. Modern artificial intelligence reconstruction algorithms have shown promise in reducing radiation dose while maintaining image quality. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the dose reduction capabilities of a deep learning-based denoising (DLD) algorithm in traumatic neuroradiological emergency CT scans. MATERIALS AND METHODS This retrospective single-center study included 100 patients with neuroradiological trauma CT scans. Full-dose (100%) and low-dose (25%) simulated scans were processed using iterative reconstruction (IR2) and DLD. Subjective and objective image quality assessments were performed by four neuroradiologists alongside clinical endpoint analysis. Bayesian sensitivity and specificity were computed with 95% credible intervals. RESULTS Subjective analysis showed superior scores for 100% DLD compared to 100% IR2 and 25% IR2 (p < 0.001). No significant differences were observed between 25% DLD and 100% IR2. Objective analysis revealed no significant CT value differences but higher noise at 25% dose for DLD and IR2 compared to 100% (p < 0.001). DLD exhibited lower noise than IR2 at both dose levels (p < 0.001). Clinical endpoint analysis indicated equivalence to 100% IR2 in fracture detection for all datasets, with sensitivity losses in hemorrhage detection at 25% IR2. DLD (25% and 100%) maintained comparable sensitivity to 100% IR2. All comparisons demonstrated robust specificity. CONCLUSIONS The evaluated algorithm enables high-quality, fully diagnostic CT scans at 25% of the initial radiation dose and improves patient care by reducing unnecessary radiation exposure.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于深度学习的去噪技术实现了高质量、完全诊断性的神经放射学创伤 CT,辐射剂量仅为 25%。
理由和目的创伤性神经放射急症需要快速准确的诊断,通常需要依靠计算机断层扫描(CT)。然而,相关的电离辐射会带来长期风险。现代人工智能重建算法有望在保持图像质量的同时减少辐射剂量。因此,我们旨在评估基于深度学习的去噪(DLD)算法在创伤性神经放射急诊 CT 扫描中降低剂量的能力。使用迭代重建(IR2)和 DLD 处理全剂量(100%)和低剂量(25%)模拟扫描。由四位神经放射学专家进行主观和客观图像质量评估,同时进行临床终点分析。结果主观分析表明,与 100% IR2 和 25% IR2 相比,100% DLD 的得分更高(p < 0.001)。25% DLD 和 100% IR2 之间无明显差异。客观分析显示,CT 值无明显差异,但 DLD 和 IR2 25% 剂量的噪声高于 100% 剂量(p < 0.001)。在两个剂量水平上,DLD 的噪声均低于 IR2(p < 0.001)。临床终点分析表明,所有数据集的骨折检测灵敏度与100% IR2相当,而25% IR2的出血检测灵敏度有所下降。DLD(25%和100%)的灵敏度与100% IR2相当。结论:所评估的算法能以 25% 的初始辐射剂量实现高质量、完全诊断性 CT 扫描,并通过减少不必要的辐射暴露来改善患者护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Academic Radiology
Academic Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
10.40%
发文量
432
审稿时长
18 days
期刊介绍: Academic Radiology publishes original reports of clinical and laboratory investigations in diagnostic imaging, the diagnostic use of radioactive isotopes, computed tomography, positron emission tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, digital subtraction angiography, image-guided interventions and related techniques. It also includes brief technical reports describing original observations, techniques, and instrumental developments; state-of-the-art reports on clinical issues, new technology and other topics of current medical importance; meta-analyses; scientific studies and opinions on radiologic education; and letters to the Editor.
期刊最新文献
Clinical Impact of Radiologist's Alert System on Patient Care for High-risk Incidental CT Findings: A Machine Learning-Based Risk Factor Analysis. Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Radiomics of Axial and Sagittal Orientation in Pregnant Patients with Suspected Placenta Accreta Spectrum. Navigating a Radiology Conference: A Comprehensive Guide for Learners. Radiomics Combined with ACR TI-RADS for Thyroid Nodules: Diagnostic Performance, Unnecessary Biopsy Rate, and Nomogram Construction. The association between FLAIR vascular hyperintensities and outcomes in patients with border zone infarcts treated with medical therapy may vary with the infarct subtype.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1