Linear Recency Bias During Training Improves Transformers' Fit to Reading Times

Christian Clark, Byung-Doh Oh, William Schuler
{"title":"Linear Recency Bias During Training Improves Transformers' Fit to Reading Times","authors":"Christian Clark, Byung-Doh Oh, William Schuler","doi":"arxiv-2409.11250","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent psycholinguistic research has compared human reading times to\nsurprisal estimates from language models to study the factors shaping human\nsentence processing difficulty. Previous studies have shown a strong fit\nbetween surprisal values from Transformers and reading times. However, standard\nTransformers work with a lossless representation of the entire previous\nlinguistic context, unlike models of human language processing that include\nmemory decay. To bridge this gap, this paper evaluates a modification of the\nTransformer model that uses ALiBi (Press et al., 2022), a recency bias added to\nattention scores. Surprisal estimates with ALiBi show an improved fit to human\nreading times compared to a standard Transformer baseline. A subsequent\nanalysis of attention heads suggests that ALiBi's mixture of slopes -- which\ndetermine the rate of memory decay in each attention head -- may play a role in\nthe improvement by helping models with ALiBi to track different kinds of\nlinguistic dependencies.","PeriodicalId":501030,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - CS - Computation and Language","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - CS - Computation and Language","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.11250","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recent psycholinguistic research has compared human reading times to surprisal estimates from language models to study the factors shaping human sentence processing difficulty. Previous studies have shown a strong fit between surprisal values from Transformers and reading times. However, standard Transformers work with a lossless representation of the entire previous linguistic context, unlike models of human language processing that include memory decay. To bridge this gap, this paper evaluates a modification of the Transformer model that uses ALiBi (Press et al., 2022), a recency bias added to attention scores. Surprisal estimates with ALiBi show an improved fit to human reading times compared to a standard Transformer baseline. A subsequent analysis of attention heads suggests that ALiBi's mixture of slopes -- which determine the rate of memory decay in each attention head -- may play a role in the improvement by helping models with ALiBi to track different kinds of linguistic dependencies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
训练过程中的线性回忆偏差可提高变压器与阅读时间的匹配度
最近的心理语言学研究将人类的阅读时间与语言模型的意外估计值进行了比较,以研究影响人类句子处理难度的因素。以往的研究表明,Transformers 得出的惊奇值与阅读时间之间的拟合度很高。然而,标准转换器使用的是整个先前语言上下文的无损表示,这与包含记忆衰减的人类语言处理模型不同。为了弥补这一差距,本文评估了使用 ALiBi(Press 等人,2022 年)对 Transformer 模型进行的修改。与标准Transformer基线相比,使用ALiBi的惊奇估计结果显示与人类阅读时间的拟合度有所提高。随后对注意力头的分析表明,ALiBi 的混合斜率--它决定了每个注意力头的记忆衰减速度--可能通过帮助使用 ALiBi 的模型跟踪不同类型的语言依赖性而起到了改善的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
LLMs + Persona-Plug = Personalized LLMs MEOW: MEMOry Supervised LLM Unlearning Via Inverted Facts Extract-and-Abstract: Unifying Extractive and Abstractive Summarization within Single Encoder-Decoder Framework Development and bilingual evaluation of Japanese medical large language model within reasonably low computational resources Human-like Affective Cognition in Foundation Models
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1