Karine Letícia da Silva, Cleysson Crovador, Rodrigo Stanislawczuk, Abraham Lincoln Calixto, Alessandra Reis, Alessandro D. Loguercio
{"title":"In‐Office Dental Bleaching Using 37% Carbamide Peroxide Versus 35% Hydrogen Peroxide: A Randomized, Double‐Blind Clinical Trial","authors":"Karine Letícia da Silva, Cleysson Crovador, Rodrigo Stanislawczuk, Abraham Lincoln Calixto, Alessandra Reis, Alessandro D. Loguercio","doi":"10.1111/jerd.13315","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ObjectiveCompare the tooth sensitivity (TS) and bleaching efficacy (BE) of in‐office dental bleaching performed with 35% hydrogen peroxide (HP) or 37% carbamide peroxide (CP).Materials and MethodsSixty‐six participants were randomly divided into two groups according to the bleaching gel applied to the right hemiarch: 35% HP, or 37% CP. TS was recorded immediately after, up to 1, 24, and 48 h after bleaching, using the VAS and NRS scales. BE was assessed before bleaching and 1 month after using color guide units (ΔSGUs) and a spectrophotometer (Δ<jats:italic>E</jats:italic><jats:sub><jats:italic>ab</jats:italic></jats:sub>, Δ<jats:italic>E</jats:italic><jats:sub>00</jats:sub>, and ΔWI<jats:sub><jats:italic>D</jats:italic></jats:sub>). TS was assessed using McNemar's and paired <jats:italic>t</jats:italic>‐test (VAS) or Wilcoxon signed rank (NRS). The paired <jats:italic>t</jats:italic>‐test was used to analyze BE (<jats:italic>α</jats:italic> = 0.05).ResultsTS risk and intensity were lower for the 37% CP (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.003 and <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> < 0.005). Despite significant differences between the groups after 1 month (ΔSGU and Δ<jats:italic>E</jats:italic><jats:sub>00</jats:sub>; <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> < 0.05), the color measurements of both groups exceeded the 50%:50% perceptibility/acceptability threshold.ConclusionIn‐office dental bleaching using 37% CP resulted in reduced risk and TS intensity, without prejudice to the BE.Clinical RelevanceThe use of 37% CP for in‐office dental bleaching could decrease TS risk and intensity without affecting BE.Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: RBR‐683qhf","PeriodicalId":15988,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.13315","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
ObjectiveCompare the tooth sensitivity (TS) and bleaching efficacy (BE) of in‐office dental bleaching performed with 35% hydrogen peroxide (HP) or 37% carbamide peroxide (CP).Materials and MethodsSixty‐six participants were randomly divided into two groups according to the bleaching gel applied to the right hemiarch: 35% HP, or 37% CP. TS was recorded immediately after, up to 1, 24, and 48 h after bleaching, using the VAS and NRS scales. BE was assessed before bleaching and 1 month after using color guide units (ΔSGUs) and a spectrophotometer (ΔEab, ΔE00, and ΔWID). TS was assessed using McNemar's and paired t‐test (VAS) or Wilcoxon signed rank (NRS). The paired t‐test was used to analyze BE (α = 0.05).ResultsTS risk and intensity were lower for the 37% CP (p = 0.003 and p < 0.005). Despite significant differences between the groups after 1 month (ΔSGU and ΔE00; p < 0.05), the color measurements of both groups exceeded the 50%:50% perceptibility/acceptability threshold.ConclusionIn‐office dental bleaching using 37% CP resulted in reduced risk and TS intensity, without prejudice to the BE.Clinical RelevanceThe use of 37% CP for in‐office dental bleaching could decrease TS risk and intensity without affecting BE.Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: RBR‐683qhf
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry (JERD) is the longest standing peer-reviewed journal devoted solely to advancing the knowledge and practice of esthetic dentistry. Its goal is to provide the very latest evidence-based information in the realm of contemporary interdisciplinary esthetic dentistry through high quality clinical papers, sound research reports and educational features.
The range of topics covered in the journal includes:
- Interdisciplinary esthetic concepts
- Implants
- Conservative adhesive restorations
- Tooth Whitening
- Prosthodontic materials and techniques
- Dental materials
- Orthodontic, periodontal and endodontic esthetics
- Esthetics related research
- Innovations in esthetics