Correlations Between Psychiatric Disorders and Perioperative Outcomes after Lumbar Fusions: An Analysis of the National Inpatient Sample (2009-2020).

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY World neurosurgery Pub Date : 2024-09-10 DOI:10.1016/j.wneu.2024.09.010
Megan D Malueg,Esteban Quiceno,Mohamed A R Soliman,Ahmed Elbayomy,Alexander O Aguirre,Hannon W Levy,Asham Khan,Moleca M Ghannam,John Pollina,Jeffrey P Mullin
{"title":"Correlations Between Psychiatric Disorders and Perioperative Outcomes after Lumbar Fusions: An Analysis of the National Inpatient Sample (2009-2020).","authors":"Megan D Malueg,Esteban Quiceno,Mohamed A R Soliman,Ahmed Elbayomy,Alexander O Aguirre,Hannon W Levy,Asham Khan,Moleca M Ghannam,John Pollina,Jeffrey P Mullin","doi":"10.1016/j.wneu.2024.09.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nPreoperative diagnoses of psychiatric disorders have a demonstrated association with higher rates of perioperative complications. However, recent studies examining the influence of psychiatric disorders on lumbar fusion outcomes are scarce. Our objective was to determine the relationship between the most common psychiatric disorders and perioperative outcomes after lumbar fusion.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nDemographic and perioperative data for patients who underwent lumbar spine fusion between 2009 and 2020 were collected from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database. These patients were divided into two groups: those who were previously diagnosed with depression, bipolar disorder, or anxiety, and those who were not. Univariable and multivariable linear and logistic regression models were utilized to analyze the data.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nOf 2,877,241 patients identified in the NIS database as having undergone lumbar fusion, 647,951 had diagnosed psychiatric disorders, and the remaining 2,229,290 were the unaffected cohort. On multivariable analysis, patients diagnosed with psychiatric disorders had significantly increased odds of respiratory (odds ratio [OR]:1.09) and urinary (OR:1.08) complications, and experienced higher odds of mechanical injury (OR:1.27), fusion disorders (OR:1.62), dural tears (OR:1.08), postprocedure anemia (OR:1.29), longer hospital stays, and higher total costs, (p<0.001). Conversely, patients with psychiatric disorders had lower odds of neurologic injury (OR:0.8) and wound complications (OR:0.91) (p<0.05).\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nPatients with depression, bipolar disorder, or anxiety exhibited higher rates of certain types of complications. However, they appeared to have fewer neurological injuries and wound complications than patients without these psychiatric disorders. These findings highlight the necessity for additional studies to elucidate underlying reasons for these disparities.","PeriodicalId":23906,"journal":{"name":"World neurosurgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2024.09.010","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND Preoperative diagnoses of psychiatric disorders have a demonstrated association with higher rates of perioperative complications. However, recent studies examining the influence of psychiatric disorders on lumbar fusion outcomes are scarce. Our objective was to determine the relationship between the most common psychiatric disorders and perioperative outcomes after lumbar fusion. METHODS Demographic and perioperative data for patients who underwent lumbar spine fusion between 2009 and 2020 were collected from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database. These patients were divided into two groups: those who were previously diagnosed with depression, bipolar disorder, or anxiety, and those who were not. Univariable and multivariable linear and logistic regression models were utilized to analyze the data. RESULTS Of 2,877,241 patients identified in the NIS database as having undergone lumbar fusion, 647,951 had diagnosed psychiatric disorders, and the remaining 2,229,290 were the unaffected cohort. On multivariable analysis, patients diagnosed with psychiatric disorders had significantly increased odds of respiratory (odds ratio [OR]:1.09) and urinary (OR:1.08) complications, and experienced higher odds of mechanical injury (OR:1.27), fusion disorders (OR:1.62), dural tears (OR:1.08), postprocedure anemia (OR:1.29), longer hospital stays, and higher total costs, (p<0.001). Conversely, patients with psychiatric disorders had lower odds of neurologic injury (OR:0.8) and wound complications (OR:0.91) (p<0.05). CONCLUSION Patients with depression, bipolar disorder, or anxiety exhibited higher rates of certain types of complications. However, they appeared to have fewer neurological injuries and wound complications than patients without these psychiatric disorders. These findings highlight the necessity for additional studies to elucidate underlying reasons for these disparities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
腰椎融合术后精神障碍与围手术期结果的相关性:全国住院病人样本分析(2009-2020 年)》。
背景术前诊断出精神障碍与围手术期并发症发生率较高有关。然而,近期很少有研究探讨精神疾病对腰椎融合术结果的影响。我们的目的是确定最常见的精神障碍与腰椎融合术后围手术期结果之间的关系。方法从全国住院患者样本(NIS)数据库中收集了 2009 年至 2020 年间接受腰椎融合术患者的人口统计学和围手术期数据。这些患者被分为两组:曾被诊断为抑郁症、双相情感障碍或焦虑症的患者和未被诊断为抑郁症、双相情感障碍或焦虑症的患者。结果 在 NIS 数据库中确认的 2,877,241 名接受过腰椎融合术的患者中,647,951 人被诊断出患有精神障碍,其余 2,229,290 人为未受影响的患者。通过多变量分析,确诊为精神障碍的患者发生呼吸系统并发症(几率比 [OR]:1.09)和泌尿系统并发症(OR:1.08)的几率明显增加,发生机械性损伤(OR:1.27)、融合障碍(OR:1.62)、硬膜撕裂(OR:1.08)、术后贫血(OR:1.29)、住院时间延长和总费用增加的几率也更高(P<0.001)。相反,精神障碍患者发生神经损伤(OR:0.8)和伤口并发症(OR:0.91)的几率较低(P<0.05)。然而,与没有这些精神障碍的患者相比,他们的神经损伤和伤口并发症似乎更少。这些发现突出表明,有必要开展更多研究,以阐明造成这些差异的根本原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
World neurosurgery
World neurosurgery CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-SURGERY
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
15.00%
发文量
1765
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: World Neurosurgery has an open access mirror journal World Neurosurgery: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review. The journal''s mission is to: -To provide a first-class international forum and a 2-way conduit for dialogue that is relevant to neurosurgeons and providers who care for neurosurgery patients. The categories of the exchanged information include clinical and basic science, as well as global information that provide social, political, educational, economic, cultural or societal insights and knowledge that are of significance and relevance to worldwide neurosurgery patient care. -To act as a primary intellectual catalyst for the stimulation of creativity, the creation of new knowledge, and the enhancement of quality neurosurgical care worldwide. -To provide a forum for communication that enriches the lives of all neurosurgeons and their colleagues; and, in so doing, enriches the lives of their patients. Topics to be addressed in World Neurosurgery include: EDUCATION, ECONOMICS, RESEARCH, POLITICS, HISTORY, CULTURE, CLINICAL SCIENCE, LABORATORY SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, OPERATIVE TECHNIQUES, CLINICAL IMAGES, VIDEOS
期刊最新文献
Artificial Intelligence for Prediction of Shunt Response in Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus: A Systematic Review. Plasma estrogen levels and aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage in women. Postural Change Assists Surgical Maneuverability During Endoscopic Transsphenoidal Surgery for Pituitary Macroadenoma. YouTube® as a Tool for Medical Education: Analyzing Content Quality and Reliability on Chiari Malformation. Evaluation of the efficacy of unilateral biportal endoscopic lamina osteotomy replantation assisted by ultrasonic bone scalpel in the treatment of lumbar infectious spondylitis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1