Characterizing Veteran suicide decedents that were not classified as high-suicide-risk

IF 5.9 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Psychological Medicine Pub Date : 2024-09-16 DOI:10.1017/s0033291724001296
Maxwell Levis, Monica Dimambro, Joshua Levy, Vincent Dufort, Abby Fraade, Max Winer, Brian Shiner
{"title":"Characterizing Veteran suicide decedents that were not classified as high-suicide-risk","authors":"Maxwell Levis, Monica Dimambro, Joshua Levy, Vincent Dufort, Abby Fraade, Max Winer, Brian Shiner","doi":"10.1017/s0033291724001296","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span>Background</span><p>Although the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) has made important suicide prevention advances, efforts primarily target high-risk patients with documented suicide risk, such as suicidal ideation, prior suicide attempts, and recent psychiatric hospitalization. Approximately 90% of VA patients that go on to die by suicide do not meet these high-risk criteria and therefore do not receive targeted suicide prevention services. In this study, we used national VA data to focus on patients that were not classified as high-risk, but died by suicide.</p><span>Methods</span><p>Our sample included all VA patients who died by suicide in 2017 or 2018. We determined whether patients were classified as high-risk using the VA's machine learning risk prediction algorithm. After excluding these patients, we used principal component analysis to identify moderate-risk and low-risk patients and investigated demographics, service-usage, diagnoses, and social determinants of health differences across high-, moderate-, and low-risk subgroups.</p><span>Results</span><p>High-risk (<span>n</span> = 452) patients tended to be younger, White, unmarried, homeless, and have more mental health diagnoses compared to moderate- (<span>n</span> = 2149) and low-risk (<span>n</span> = 2209) patients. Moderate- and low-risk patients tended to be older, married, Black, and Native American or Pacific Islander, and have more physical health diagnoses compared to high-risk patients. Low-risk patients had more missing data than higher-risk patients.</p><span>Conclusions</span><p>Study expands epidemiological understanding about non-high-risk suicide decedents, historically understudied and underserved populations. Findings raise concerns about reliance on machine learning risk prediction models that may be biased by relative underrepresentation of racial/ethnic minorities within health system.</p>","PeriodicalId":20891,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0033291724001296","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Although the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) has made important suicide prevention advances, efforts primarily target high-risk patients with documented suicide risk, such as suicidal ideation, prior suicide attempts, and recent psychiatric hospitalization. Approximately 90% of VA patients that go on to die by suicide do not meet these high-risk criteria and therefore do not receive targeted suicide prevention services. In this study, we used national VA data to focus on patients that were not classified as high-risk, but died by suicide.

Methods

Our sample included all VA patients who died by suicide in 2017 or 2018. We determined whether patients were classified as high-risk using the VA's machine learning risk prediction algorithm. After excluding these patients, we used principal component analysis to identify moderate-risk and low-risk patients and investigated demographics, service-usage, diagnoses, and social determinants of health differences across high-, moderate-, and low-risk subgroups.

Results

High-risk (n = 452) patients tended to be younger, White, unmarried, homeless, and have more mental health diagnoses compared to moderate- (n = 2149) and low-risk (n = 2209) patients. Moderate- and low-risk patients tended to be older, married, Black, and Native American or Pacific Islander, and have more physical health diagnoses compared to high-risk patients. Low-risk patients had more missing data than higher-risk patients.

Conclusions

Study expands epidemiological understanding about non-high-risk suicide decedents, historically understudied and underserved populations. Findings raise concerns about reliance on machine learning risk prediction models that may be biased by relative underrepresentation of racial/ethnic minorities within health system.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
未被列为高自杀风险的退伍军人自杀死者的特征
背景虽然退伍军人事务部(VA)在预防自杀方面取得了重要进展,但其工作主要针对的是有自杀风险记录的高危患者,例如有自杀意念、曾有自杀企图以及最近曾住过精神病院。大约 90% 的退伍军人自杀死亡患者不符合这些高风险标准,因此没有得到有针对性的自杀预防服务。在本研究中,我们使用退伍军人事务部的全国数据,重点关注未被归类为高风险但死于自杀的患者。方法我们的样本包括所有在 2017 年或 2018 年死于自杀的退伍军人事务部患者。我们使用退伍军人事务部的机器学习风险预测算法确定患者是否被归类为高风险。排除这些患者后,我们使用主成分分析来确定中度风险和低风险患者,并调查了高、中、低风险亚组的人口统计学、服务使用、诊断和健康的社会决定因素差异。结果与中度风险(n = 2149)和低风险(n = 2209)患者相比,高风险(n = 452)患者倾向于年轻、白人、未婚、无家可归,并有更多的心理健康诊断。与高风险患者相比,中度和低风险患者往往年龄较大、已婚、黑人、美国原住民或太平洋岛民,并有更多的身体健康诊断。与高危患者相比,低危患者有更多的数据缺失。结论这项研究拓展了流行病学对非高危自杀死者的了解,这些死者是历来研究不足和服务欠缺的人群。研究结果引起了人们对依赖机器学习风险预测模型的担忧,因为这种模型可能会因医疗系统中少数种族/族裔的代表性相对不足而产生偏差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Psychological Medicine
Psychological Medicine 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
4.30%
发文量
711
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Now in its fifth decade of publication, Psychological Medicine is a leading international journal in the fields of psychiatry, related aspects of psychology and basic sciences. From 2014, there are 16 issues a year, each featuring original articles reporting key research being undertaken worldwide, together with shorter editorials by distinguished scholars and an important book review section. The journal''s success is clearly demonstrated by a consistently high impact factor.
期刊最新文献
Characterizing Veteran suicide decedents that were not classified as high-suicide-risk Genetic architecture and socio-environmental risk factors for major depressive disorder in Nepal Do people recover from the impact of COVID-19 social isolation? Social connectivity and negative affective bias. Lisdexamfetamine maintenance treatment for binge-eating disorder following successful treatments: randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial Discussing the concept of substance-induced psychosis (SIP)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1