‘Broken souls’ vs. ‘mad ax man’ – changes in the portrayal of depression and schizophrenia in the German media over 10 years

IF 5.9 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences Pub Date : 2024-09-18 DOI:10.1017/s204579602400043x
M. Sittner, T. Rechenberg, S. Speerforck, M.C Angermeyer, G. Schomerus
{"title":"‘Broken souls’ vs. ‘mad ax man’ – changes in the portrayal of depression and schizophrenia in the German media over 10 years","authors":"M. Sittner, T. Rechenberg, S. Speerforck, M.C Angermeyer, G. Schomerus","doi":"10.1017/s204579602400043x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aims Population studies show the stigma of depression to diminish, while the stigma of schizophrenia increases. To find out whether this widening gap is reflected in the media portrayal of both disorders, this study compares the portrayal of depression and schizophrenia in German print media in 2010 vs. 2020. Methods We conducted a qualitative content analysis using a mixed deductive-inductive approach to establish a category system. In total, we analyzed 854 articles with the summative approach by Mayring. Results The study found a widening gap in the portrayal of schizophrenia and depression in German media between 2010 and 2020. Schizophrenia was depicted increasingly negative between 2010 and 2020, covering more negative stereotypes and focusing on its biological causes. Depression received increased attention and more neutral and professional coverage, with a greater emphasis on psychosocial causes and discussion of treatment options. Conclusions By showing a widening gap the study highlights how media may shape public views on mental illnesses and reflects public attitudes at the same time. Media analyses from other nations have shown similar trends. This emphasizes the need for responsible reporting to combat stigma and promote understanding worldwide. Therefore, the authors recommend a balanced coverage that includes accurate professional information about all mental illnesses.","PeriodicalId":11787,"journal":{"name":"Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s204579602400043x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims Population studies show the stigma of depression to diminish, while the stigma of schizophrenia increases. To find out whether this widening gap is reflected in the media portrayal of both disorders, this study compares the portrayal of depression and schizophrenia in German print media in 2010 vs. 2020. Methods We conducted a qualitative content analysis using a mixed deductive-inductive approach to establish a category system. In total, we analyzed 854 articles with the summative approach by Mayring. Results The study found a widening gap in the portrayal of schizophrenia and depression in German media between 2010 and 2020. Schizophrenia was depicted increasingly negative between 2010 and 2020, covering more negative stereotypes and focusing on its biological causes. Depression received increased attention and more neutral and professional coverage, with a greater emphasis on psychosocial causes and discussion of treatment options. Conclusions By showing a widening gap the study highlights how media may shape public views on mental illnesses and reflects public attitudes at the same time. Media analyses from other nations have shown similar trends. This emphasizes the need for responsible reporting to combat stigma and promote understanding worldwide. Therefore, the authors recommend a balanced coverage that includes accurate professional information about all mental illnesses.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
破碎的灵魂 "与 "疯狂的斧头男"--10 年来德国媒体对抑郁症和精神分裂症的描述变化
研究目的 人口研究表明,抑郁症的耻辱感在减少,而精神分裂症的耻辱感在增加。为了了解这种差距的扩大是否反映在媒体对这两种疾病的描述中,本研究比较了 2010 年和 2020 年德国平面媒体对抑郁症和精神分裂症的描述。方法 我们采用演绎-归纳混合法进行了定性内容分析,建立了一个分类系统。我们采用 Mayring 的总结性方法共分析了 854 篇文章。结果 研究发现,2010 年至 2020 年间,德国媒体对精神分裂症和抑郁症的描述差距越来越大。在 2010 年至 2020 年期间,精神分裂症的描述越来越负面,涵盖了更多负面的刻板印象,并侧重于其生物学原因。抑郁症受到更多关注,报道更加中立和专业,更加强调社会心理原因和对治疗方案的讨论。结论 通过显示差距的扩大,本研究强调了媒体如何塑造公众对精神疾病的看法,同时也反映了公众的态度。其他国家的媒体分析也显示了类似的趋势。这就强调了负责任的报道对于消除污名化和促进全球理解的必要性。因此,作者建议进行均衡的报道,包括有关所有精神疾病的准确专业信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
1.20%
发文量
121
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences is a prestigious international, peer-reviewed journal that has been publishing in Open Access format since 2020. Formerly known as Epidemiologia e Psichiatria Sociale and established in 1992 by Michele Tansella, the journal prioritizes highly relevant and innovative research articles and systematic reviews in the areas of public mental health and policy, mental health services and system research, as well as epidemiological and social psychiatry. Join us in advancing knowledge and understanding in these critical fields.
期刊最新文献
Social disconnectedness, subsequent medical conditions, and, the role of pre-existing mental disorders: a population-based cohort study. Twelve-month follow-up of a controlled trial of a brief behavioural intervention to reduce psychological distress in young adolescent Syrian refugees. Rates of colorectal cancer diagnosis and mortality in people with severe mental illness: results from Australia's National Bowel Cancer Screening Programme. A longitudinal birth cohort study of child maltreatment and mental disorders using linked statewide child protection and administrative health data for 83,050 Queensland residents from 1983 to 2014 - ERRATUM. Bidirectional analysis of the association between migraine and post-traumatic stress disorder in Nurses' Health Study II.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1