Practice Patterns of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Use in the Diagnosis of Pediatric Myocarditis: A Survey-Based Study.

IF 4.2 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Pub Date : 2024-09-11 DOI:10.1016/j.jocmr.2024.101091
Hannah M Jacobs,Jonathan H Soslow,Matthew D Cornicelli,Shae A Merves,Ruchira Garg,Mehul D Patel,Arpit Agarwal,Nilanjana Misra,Michael P DiLorenzo,M Jay Campbell,Jeremy Steele,Jennifer Co-Vu,Joshua D Robinson,Simon Lee,Jason N Johnson
{"title":"Practice Patterns of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Use in the Diagnosis of Pediatric Myocarditis: A Survey-Based Study.","authors":"Hannah M Jacobs,Jonathan H Soslow,Matthew D Cornicelli,Shae A Merves,Ruchira Garg,Mehul D Patel,Arpit Agarwal,Nilanjana Misra,Michael P DiLorenzo,M Jay Campbell,Jeremy Steele,Jennifer Co-Vu,Joshua D Robinson,Simon Lee,Jason N Johnson","doi":"10.1016/j.jocmr.2024.101091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nCardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is used to diagnose myocarditis in adults and children based on the original Lake Louise Criteria (LLC) and more recently the revised LLC. The major change included in the revised LLC was the incorporation of parametric mapping, which significantly increases the sensitivity and specificity of diagnosis. Subsequently, scientific statements have recommended the use of parametric mapping in the diagnosis of myocarditis in children. However, there are some challenges to parametric mapping that are unique to the pediatric population. Our goal is to characterize clinical CMR and parametric mapping practice patterns for diagnosis of myocarditis in pediatric centers.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nThe Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Evaluation in Return to Athletes for Myocarditis in COVID-19 and Immunization Consortium created a REDCap survey to evaluate clinical practice patterns for diagnosis of myocarditis in pediatrics. This survey was distributed to the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance community.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\n59 responses from 51 centers were received, with only one response from each center being utilized. Only 35% of centers (37% of North America, 31% of international) reported using CMR routinely in all patients with a suspicion for myocarditis. Diagnostic uncertainty was noted as the most important reason for CMR, while cost was noted as the least important consideration. The majority of centers reported using the revised LLC (37/51, 72%) compared to original LLC (7/51, 14%) or a hybrid criteria (6/51, 12%). When looking at the use of parametric mapping, only 5/47 (11%) for T1 mapping and 11/49 (22%) for T2 mapping reported having scanner-specific pediatric normative data.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nRoutine CMR imaging for diagnosis of myocarditis in pediatrics is infrequently performed at surveyed centers despite the focus on a group of non-invasive cardiac imagers. While the majority reported using parametric mapping, few centers reporting having pediatric scanner-specific normative data. This highlights an important gap in the utilization of CMR that may aid in the diagnosis of myocardial disease.","PeriodicalId":15221,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance","volume":"93 1","pages":"101091"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocmr.2024.101091","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is used to diagnose myocarditis in adults and children based on the original Lake Louise Criteria (LLC) and more recently the revised LLC. The major change included in the revised LLC was the incorporation of parametric mapping, which significantly increases the sensitivity and specificity of diagnosis. Subsequently, scientific statements have recommended the use of parametric mapping in the diagnosis of myocarditis in children. However, there are some challenges to parametric mapping that are unique to the pediatric population. Our goal is to characterize clinical CMR and parametric mapping practice patterns for diagnosis of myocarditis in pediatric centers. METHODS The Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Evaluation in Return to Athletes for Myocarditis in COVID-19 and Immunization Consortium created a REDCap survey to evaluate clinical practice patterns for diagnosis of myocarditis in pediatrics. This survey was distributed to the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance community. RESULTS 59 responses from 51 centers were received, with only one response from each center being utilized. Only 35% of centers (37% of North America, 31% of international) reported using CMR routinely in all patients with a suspicion for myocarditis. Diagnostic uncertainty was noted as the most important reason for CMR, while cost was noted as the least important consideration. The majority of centers reported using the revised LLC (37/51, 72%) compared to original LLC (7/51, 14%) or a hybrid criteria (6/51, 12%). When looking at the use of parametric mapping, only 5/47 (11%) for T1 mapping and 11/49 (22%) for T2 mapping reported having scanner-specific pediatric normative data. CONCLUSION Routine CMR imaging for diagnosis of myocarditis in pediatrics is infrequently performed at surveyed centers despite the focus on a group of non-invasive cardiac imagers. While the majority reported using parametric mapping, few centers reporting having pediatric scanner-specific normative data. This highlights an important gap in the utilization of CMR that may aid in the diagnosis of myocardial disease.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
心血管磁共振用于诊断小儿心肌炎的实践模式:基于调查的研究。
背景心血管磁共振(CMR)是根据最初的路易斯湖标准(LLC)和最近修订的 LLC 诊断成人和儿童心肌炎的。修订版 LLC 的主要变化是纳入了参数图谱,这大大提高了诊断的灵敏度和特异性。随后,科学声明建议在诊断儿童心肌炎时使用参数图谱。然而,参数图谱在儿科人群中存在一些独特的挑战。我们的目标是描述儿科中心诊断心肌炎的临床 CMR 和参数图谱实践模式。方法COVID-19 和免疫联合会心血管磁共振评估返回运动员心肌炎创建了一个 REDCap 调查,以评估儿科诊断心肌炎的临床实践模式。结果共收到 51 个中心的 59 份回复,每个中心只有一份回复被采用。只有 35% 的中心(37% 的北美中心和 31% 的国际中心)表示对所有怀疑患有心肌炎的患者常规使用 CMR。诊断不确定性被认为是进行 CMR 的最重要原因,而成本被认为是最不重要的考虑因素。大多数中心报告使用了修订版 LLC(37/51,72%),而未使用原始 LLC(7/51,14%)或混合标准(6/51,12%)。在研究参数图谱的使用情况时,只有 5/47 (11%) 的 T1 图谱和 11/49 (22%) 的 T2 图谱报告有扫描仪特定的儿科规范数据。虽然大多数中心报告使用了参数图谱,但很少有中心报告拥有儿科专用扫描仪的标准数据。这凸显了在利用可帮助诊断心肌疾病的 CMR 方面存在的重要差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
12.50%
发文量
61
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (JCMR) publishes high-quality articles on all aspects of basic, translational and clinical research on the design, development, manufacture, and evaluation of cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) methods applied to the cardiovascular system. Topical areas include, but are not limited to: New applications of magnetic resonance to improve the diagnostic strategies, risk stratification, characterization and management of diseases affecting the cardiovascular system. New methods to enhance or accelerate image acquisition and data analysis. Results of multicenter, or larger single-center studies that provide insight into the utility of CMR. Basic biological perceptions derived by CMR methods.
期刊最新文献
Automatic Vessel Segmentation and Reformation of Non-contrast Coronary Magnetic Resonance Angiography Using Transfer Learning-based 3D U-net with Attention Mechanism. Absence of cardiac impairment in patients after SARS-CoV-2 infection: a long-term follow-up study. Simultaneous Multislice Cardiac Multimapping based on Locally Low-Rank and Sparsity Constraints. Joint suppression of cardiac bSSFP cine banding and flow artifacts using twofold phase-cycling and a dual-encoder neural network. Non-Invasively Measured Myocardial Torsional Modulus: Comparison to Invasive Evaluation of Diastolic Function.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1