Diagnostic Accuracy of Dermatoscopy Versus Microbiological Culture and Polymerase Chain Reaction in the Diagnosis of Onychomycosis: A Cross‐Sectional Study

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY Mycoses Pub Date : 2024-09-18 DOI:10.1111/myc.13799
David Navarro‐Pérez, Aroa Tardáguila‐García, Sara García‐Oreja, Diego León‐Herce, Francisco Javier Álvaro‐Afonso, José Luis Lázaro‐Martínez
{"title":"Diagnostic Accuracy of Dermatoscopy Versus Microbiological Culture and Polymerase Chain Reaction in the Diagnosis of Onychomycosis: A Cross‐Sectional Study","authors":"David Navarro‐Pérez, Aroa Tardáguila‐García, Sara García‐Oreja, Diego León‐Herce, Francisco Javier Álvaro‐Afonso, José Luis Lázaro‐Martínez","doi":"10.1111/myc.13799","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BackgroundSeveral clinical signs in dermatoscopy are very characteristic of onychomycosis and can be a quick complement for the diagnosis of onychomycosis.ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of dermatoscopy compared to microbiological culture and polymerase chain reaction (PCR), as well as the clinical signs associated with onychomycosis.MethodsThe clinical signs of 125 patients were assessed cross‐sectionally using dermatoscopy, and a positive or negative result was assigned. A sample was then taken for PCR and microbiological culture.ResultsOf the 125 patients, 69.6% (87/125) had positive results when both laboratory tests were combined. When they were not combined, the prevalence was lower at 48% (60/125) with PCR and at 43.2% (54/125) with culture. Furthermore, 76.8% (96/125) were classified as positive with dermatoscopy with a sensitivity of 1, a specificity of 0.76, positive predictive value of 0.91 and negative predictive value of 1 (with 95% confidence intervals). Of the 96 dermatoscopy‐positive samples, 36 were negative with PCR (<jats:italic>p &lt;</jats:italic> 0.001), 42 were negative with culture (<jats:italic>p &lt;</jats:italic> 0.001) and nine were negative when both tests were combined (<jats:italic>p &lt;</jats:italic> 0.001). Clinical signs that were significantly associated with the presence of onychomycosis were subungual hyperkeratosis (dermatoscopy: <jats:italic>p =</jats:italic> 0.004, odds ratio (OR) = 2.438; PCR + microbiological culture: <jats:italic>p =</jats:italic> 0.004, OR = 3.221), subungual detritus (<jats:italic>p =</jats:italic> 0.033, OR = 3.01, only with dermatoscopy) and dermatophytoma (dermatoscopy: <jats:italic>p =</jats:italic> 0.049, OR = 3.02; PCR + microbiological culture: <jats:italic>p =</jats:italic> 0.022, OR = 2.40).ConclusionsThe results suggest that dermatoscopy is a good tool for the diagnosis of onychomycosis but should be used as a complementary test or for screening patients to be sampled for laboratory testing. The combination of the three tests can lead to a reduction of false‐positive and false‐negative clinical and laboratory results. This allows for early diagnosis and specific treatment based on test results.","PeriodicalId":18797,"journal":{"name":"Mycoses","volume":"153 1","pages":"e13799"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mycoses","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/myc.13799","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundSeveral clinical signs in dermatoscopy are very characteristic of onychomycosis and can be a quick complement for the diagnosis of onychomycosis.ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of dermatoscopy compared to microbiological culture and polymerase chain reaction (PCR), as well as the clinical signs associated with onychomycosis.MethodsThe clinical signs of 125 patients were assessed cross‐sectionally using dermatoscopy, and a positive or negative result was assigned. A sample was then taken for PCR and microbiological culture.ResultsOf the 125 patients, 69.6% (87/125) had positive results when both laboratory tests were combined. When they were not combined, the prevalence was lower at 48% (60/125) with PCR and at 43.2% (54/125) with culture. Furthermore, 76.8% (96/125) were classified as positive with dermatoscopy with a sensitivity of 1, a specificity of 0.76, positive predictive value of 0.91 and negative predictive value of 1 (with 95% confidence intervals). Of the 96 dermatoscopy‐positive samples, 36 were negative with PCR (p < 0.001), 42 were negative with culture (p < 0.001) and nine were negative when both tests were combined (p < 0.001). Clinical signs that were significantly associated with the presence of onychomycosis were subungual hyperkeratosis (dermatoscopy: p = 0.004, odds ratio (OR) = 2.438; PCR + microbiological culture: p = 0.004, OR = 3.221), subungual detritus (p = 0.033, OR = 3.01, only with dermatoscopy) and dermatophytoma (dermatoscopy: p = 0.049, OR = 3.02; PCR + microbiological culture: p = 0.022, OR = 2.40).ConclusionsThe results suggest that dermatoscopy is a good tool for the diagnosis of onychomycosis but should be used as a complementary test or for screening patients to be sampled for laboratory testing. The combination of the three tests can lead to a reduction of false‐positive and false‐negative clinical and laboratory results. This allows for early diagnosis and specific treatment based on test results.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
皮肤镜与微生物培养和聚合酶链反应在诊断甲癣中的准确性:横断面研究
背景皮肤镜检查中的一些临床表现是甲癣的特征性表现,可以作为诊断甲癣的快速补充。研究目的评估皮肤镜检查与微生物培养和聚合酶链反应(PCR)相比的诊断准确性,以及与甲癣相关的临床表现。结果 在 125 名患者中,将两种实验室检测合并后,69.6%(87/125)的结果为阳性。如果不同时进行这两项化验,则 PCR 阳性率为 48%(60/125),培养阳性率为 43.2%(54/125)。此外,76.8%(96/125)的皮肤镜检查结果为阳性,灵敏度为 1,特异性为 0.76,阳性预测值为 0.91,阴性预测值为 1(置信区间为 95%)。在 96 份皮肤镜检查呈阳性的样本中,36 份样本的 PCR 检测结果为阴性(p < 0.001),42 份样本的培养检测结果为阴性(p < 0.001),9 份样本的两种检测结果均为阴性(p < 0.001)。与甲真菌病存在明显相关的临床表现有:真皮下角化过度(皮肤镜检查:p = 0.004,几率比(OR)= 2.438;PCR + 微生物培养:p = 0.004,OR = 3.221)、真皮下脱屑(p = 0.033,OR = 3.01,仅在皮肤镜检查时)和真皮瘤(皮肤镜检查:p = 0.结论结果表明,皮肤镜检查是诊断甲癣的良好工具,但应作为补充检查或用于筛查病人,以便取样进行实验室检查。三种检测方法的结合可减少临床和实验室检测结果的假阳性和假阴性。这样就可以根据检测结果进行早期诊断和具体治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Mycoses
Mycoses 医学-皮肤病学
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
8.20%
发文量
143
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal Mycoses provides an international forum for original papers in English on the pathogenesis, diagnosis, therapy, prophylaxis, and epidemiology of fungal infectious diseases in humans as well as on the biology of pathogenic fungi. Medical mycology as part of medical microbiology is advancing rapidly. Effective therapeutic strategies are already available in chemotherapy and are being further developed. Their application requires reliable laboratory diagnostic techniques, which, in turn, result from mycological basic research. Opportunistic mycoses vary greatly in their clinical and pathological symptoms, because the underlying disease of a patient at risk decisively determines their symptomatology and progress. The journal Mycoses is therefore of interest to scientists in fundamental mycological research, mycological laboratory diagnosticians and clinicians interested in fungal infections.
期刊最新文献
High-Resolution Melting Assay to Detect the Mutations That Cause the Y132F and G458S Substitutions at the ERG11 Gene Involved in Azole Resistance in Candida parapsilosis. First Reported Cases of Terbinafine-Resistant Trichophyton indotineae Isolates in Israel: Epidemiology, Clinical Characteristics and Response to Treatment. Multicentre Study of Candida parapsilosis Blood Isolates in Türkiye Highlights an Increasing Rate of Fluconazole Resistance and Emergence of Echinocandin and Multidrug Resistance. The In Vitro Activity of Rezafungin Against Uncommon Species of Candida. Detecting Echinocandin Resistance in C. glabrata Using Commercial Methods: Are CLSI or EUCAST Breakpoints Suitable for Categorical Classification?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1