Towards explaining the fertility gap in farmed Pekin ducks

Cammy H Beyts, Jonathan Wright, Yimen Araya-Ajoy, Kellie Watson
{"title":"Towards explaining the fertility gap in farmed Pekin ducks","authors":"Cammy H Beyts, Jonathan Wright, Yimen Araya-Ajoy, Kellie Watson","doi":"10.1101/2024.09.12.612586","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Maximising reproductive success is crucial to animal production systems, particularly in meeting global demands for animal products and improving commercially important traits. However, while social interactions and mating strategies are known to influence reproductive success in wild populations, their consideration in agricultural systems remains limited. Using an interdisciplinary framework that combines concepts from behavioural ecology and quantitative genetics in an animal breeding context, we investigated the role of sperm limitation and polygynous mating strategies (female polyandry, male monopolisation of females and male polygamy) in limiting female reproductive success in farmed Pekin ducks (Anas platyrthynchos domestica). We assessed the impact of these behaviours on chick production and quantified their genetic and environmental (co)variance. Our results revealed that the number of dam mates positively influenced chick production in female ducks. However, contrary to our expectation, skew in chick paternity (our measure of male monopolisation) was associated with increased female chick production, challenging the hypothesis that male monopolisation limits the sperm available to females and reduces their reproductive success. We found no evidence that male polygamy led to decreased female chick production. Genetic analysis revealed that female mate number and reproductive skew exhibit genetic variance, providing opportunities for targeted selection to enhance chick production. However, there was a negative genetic association between female polyandry and skew in chick paternity, suggesting a trade-off between these traits that would need to be considered in future selection programmes. Our findings highlight how concepts from behavioural ecology can be incorporated into breeding programmes, providing new opportunities to develop effective and sustainable breeding strategies.","PeriodicalId":501183,"journal":{"name":"bioRxiv - Evolutionary Biology","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"bioRxiv - Evolutionary Biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.12.612586","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Maximising reproductive success is crucial to animal production systems, particularly in meeting global demands for animal products and improving commercially important traits. However, while social interactions and mating strategies are known to influence reproductive success in wild populations, their consideration in agricultural systems remains limited. Using an interdisciplinary framework that combines concepts from behavioural ecology and quantitative genetics in an animal breeding context, we investigated the role of sperm limitation and polygynous mating strategies (female polyandry, male monopolisation of females and male polygamy) in limiting female reproductive success in farmed Pekin ducks (Anas platyrthynchos domestica). We assessed the impact of these behaviours on chick production and quantified their genetic and environmental (co)variance. Our results revealed that the number of dam mates positively influenced chick production in female ducks. However, contrary to our expectation, skew in chick paternity (our measure of male monopolisation) was associated with increased female chick production, challenging the hypothesis that male monopolisation limits the sperm available to females and reduces their reproductive success. We found no evidence that male polygamy led to decreased female chick production. Genetic analysis revealed that female mate number and reproductive skew exhibit genetic variance, providing opportunities for targeted selection to enhance chick production. However, there was a negative genetic association between female polyandry and skew in chick paternity, suggesting a trade-off between these traits that would need to be considered in future selection programmes. Our findings highlight how concepts from behavioural ecology can be incorporated into breeding programmes, providing new opportunities to develop effective and sustainable breeding strategies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
解释养殖北京鸭的繁殖力差距
最大限度地提高繁殖成功率对动物生产系统至关重要,尤其是在满足全球对动物产品的需求和改善具有重要商业价值的性状方面。然而,尽管已知社会互动和交配策略会影响野生种群的繁殖成功率,但在农业系统中对它们的考虑仍然有限。我们采用跨学科框架,将行为生态学和定量遗传学的概念结合到动物育种中,研究了精子限制和多雌交配策略(雌性多雄性、雄性垄断雌性和雄性一夫多妻制)在限制养殖北京鸭(Anas platyrthynchos domestica)雌性繁殖成功率中的作用。我们评估了这些行为对雏鸭生产的影响,并量化了它们的遗传和环境(共)变异。我们的结果表明,母鸭配偶数对雏鸭的产量有积极影响。然而,与我们的预期相反,雏鸭父亲身份的偏斜(我们对雄性垄断的衡量标准)与雌性雏鸭产量的增加有关,这对雄性垄断限制了雌性可获得的精子并降低其繁殖成功率的假设提出了质疑。我们没有发现雄性一夫多妻会导致雌性雏鸟产量下降的证据。遗传分析表明,雌性交配数量和生殖偏斜表现出遗传变异,为提高雏鸡产量的定向选择提供了机会。然而,雌性一夫多妻制与雏鸟父亲身份的偏斜之间存在负遗传关联,这表明这些性状之间存在权衡,需要在未来的选择计划中加以考虑。我们的研究结果强调了如何将行为生态学的概念纳入育种计划,为制定有效和可持续的育种策略提供了新的机遇。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Conserved Evolutionary Response to Whole Genome Duplication in Angiosperms Revealed Using High Resolution Gene Expression Profiling Adaptation to climate in the native and introduced ranges of a cosmopolitan plant Ecotype formation in the European anchovy fuelled by structural variants of different origins and genetic interactions with a southern lineage Most Beefalo cattle have no detectable bison genetic ancestry An Experimental Test of Local Adaptation in Native and Introduced Populations of an Ectomycorrhizal Fungus, Suillus luteus
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1