Deadly yet Preventable? Lessons From South Korea’s Halloween Crowd Crush

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness Pub Date : 2024-09-19 DOI:10.1017/dmp.2024.94
Zhaohui Su, Ali Cheshmehzangi, Barry L. Bentley, Dean McDonnell, Junaid Ahmad, Sabina Šegalo, Claudimar P. da Veiga, Yu-Tao Xiang
{"title":"Deadly yet Preventable? Lessons From South Korea’s Halloween Crowd Crush","authors":"Zhaohui Su, Ali Cheshmehzangi, Barry L. Bentley, Dean McDonnell, Junaid Ahmad, Sabina Šegalo, Claudimar P. da Veiga, Yu-Tao Xiang","doi":"10.1017/dmp.2024.94","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Avoidable disasters are both saddening and baffling. In 2022, 159 people, mostly in their 20s, and 30s were crushed to death in Itaewon’s narrow alleyway amid South Korea’s first pandemic-restrictions-free Halloween celebration. What is particularly sobering about this tragedy is that although many people called police hotlines as crowds became cramped and static, their calls went unheeded for hours. Rather than order independent investigations into the catastrophe (as of January 2024), the President of South Korea at the time focused on superficial issues such as asking the public to refer to the disaster as an “accident” (which it was not, it was an avoidable disaster) and the casualties as “the dead” (who are casualties indeed, instead of victims of a preventable tragedy). In this paper, we examine how officials’ complacency about public health and safety dangers, ineffective disaster prevention, and preparedness systems, as well as the government’s chronic lack of prioritization of public health and safety may have contributed to the disaster. Furthermore, we discuss the importance of creating integrated public health and safety protection systems to prevent similar tragedies from happening.</p>","PeriodicalId":54390,"journal":{"name":"Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/dmp.2024.94","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Avoidable disasters are both saddening and baffling. In 2022, 159 people, mostly in their 20s, and 30s were crushed to death in Itaewon’s narrow alleyway amid South Korea’s first pandemic-restrictions-free Halloween celebration. What is particularly sobering about this tragedy is that although many people called police hotlines as crowds became cramped and static, their calls went unheeded for hours. Rather than order independent investigations into the catastrophe (as of January 2024), the President of South Korea at the time focused on superficial issues such as asking the public to refer to the disaster as an “accident” (which it was not, it was an avoidable disaster) and the casualties as “the dead” (who are casualties indeed, instead of victims of a preventable tragedy). In this paper, we examine how officials’ complacency about public health and safety dangers, ineffective disaster prevention, and preparedness systems, as well as the government’s chronic lack of prioritization of public health and safety may have contributed to the disaster. Furthermore, we discuss the importance of creating integrated public health and safety protection systems to prevent similar tragedies from happening.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
致命却可预防?韩国万圣节人潮汹涌的教训
可以避免的灾难既令人痛心,又令人费解。2022 年,在韩国首个没有大流行病限制的万圣节庆祝活动中,159 人被压死在梨泰院狭窄的巷子里,其中大部分是 20 多岁和 30 多岁的年轻人。这场悲剧尤其令人痛心的是,尽管许多人在人群变得拥挤和静止时拨打了报警热线,但他们的电话几个小时都无人接听。当时的韩国总统没有下令对这场灾难进行独立调查(截至 2024 年 1 月),而是将注意力集中在一些表面问题上,例如要求公众将这场灾难称为 "事故"(这不是事故,这是一场可以避免的灾难),将伤亡者称为 "死者"(他们确实是伤亡者,而不是一场可以避免的悲剧的受害者)。在本文中,我们将探讨官员对公共健康和安全危险的自满情绪、无效的防灾和备灾系统,以及政府长期缺乏对公共健康和安全的优先考虑是如何导致这场灾难的。此外,我们还讨论了建立综合公共卫生和安全保护系统以防止类似悲剧发生的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
7.40%
发文量
258
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness is the first comprehensive and authoritative journal emphasizing public health preparedness and disaster response for all health care and public health professionals globally. The journal seeks to translate science into practice and integrate medical and public health perspectives. With the events of September 11, the subsequent anthrax attacks, the tsunami in Indonesia, hurricane Katrina, SARS and the H1N1 Influenza Pandemic, all health care and public health professionals must be prepared to respond to emergency situations. In support of these pressing public health needs, Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness is committed to the medical and public health communities who are the stewards of the health and security of citizens worldwide.
期刊最新文献
Review of National Health Service England's Emergency Preparedness, Resilience and Response Annual Assurance for 2021-2022. Deadly yet Preventable? Lessons From South Korea’s Halloween Crowd Crush The Impact of COVID-19 Fear on Mental Health of Community Behavioral Health Providers A Possible Nocebo Effect in Children Following the Flint Water Crisis: Evidence From Schoolteacher Perceptions and Neuropsychological Evaluations Treatment-related Problems and Countermeasures for Patients Undergoing Maintenance Hemodialysis Following Tropical Cyclones: A Scoping Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1