Evaluating the quality of multiple‐choice question pilot database: A global educator‐created tool for concept‐based pharmacology learning

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pharmacology Research & Perspectives Pub Date : 2024-09-13 DOI:10.1002/prp2.70004
Adeladlew Kassie Netere, Tony Hughes, Anna‐Marie Babey, Martin Hawes, Janet Mifsud, John P. Kelly, Willmann Liang, Mark Hernandez, Kelly Karpa, Hesham Al‐Sallami, Lynette B. Fernandes, Patrik Aronsson, Carolina Restini, Fabiana Caetano Crowley, Elvan Djouma, Tina Hinton, Johnson J. Liu, Fatima Mraiche, Paul J. White
{"title":"Evaluating the quality of multiple‐choice question pilot database: A global educator‐created tool for concept‐based pharmacology learning","authors":"Adeladlew Kassie Netere, Tony Hughes, Anna‐Marie Babey, Martin Hawes, Janet Mifsud, John P. Kelly, Willmann Liang, Mark Hernandez, Kelly Karpa, Hesham Al‐Sallami, Lynette B. Fernandes, Patrik Aronsson, Carolina Restini, Fabiana Caetano Crowley, Elvan Djouma, Tina Hinton, Johnson J. Liu, Fatima Mraiche, Paul J. White","doi":"10.1002/prp2.70004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Core Concepts of Pharmacology (CCP) initiative is developing educational resources to transform pharmacology education into a concept‐based approach. This study evaluated the quality of global educator‐created MCQs in generating items for the pharmacology concept inventory (PCI) instrument and developed as a resource for learning pharmacology fundamental concepts. A panel of 22 global pharmacology experts recruited from the CCP initiative research team participated in the MCQ pilot database design and evaluation. The quality analysis framework of the MCQs in the pilot database included four assessment tools: item writing guidelines (IWGs), Bloom's taxonomy, the CCP, and the MCQ design format. A two‐phase evaluation process was involved, including inter‐rater agreement on item quality, followed by resolving conflicts that occurred in quality assessment. The chi‐square (<jats:italic>χ</jats:italic><jats:sup>2</jats:sup>) test of independence and Cramer's V correlation tests were utilized to measure the relationship among quality assessment attributes. About 200 MCQs were gathered and 98% underwent expert evaluation. Nearly 80% addressed one or more CCP, with 52% designed using a context‐dependent format. However, only 40% addressed higher levels of Bloom's cognitive domain and 10% adhered to all IWGs. A strong positive correlation was observed between the context‐based item format and its effectiveness in assessing the higher cognitive domain, the main CCP and improved IWGs adherence. Context‐based item construction can assess the higher cognitive skills and fundamental pharmacology concepts, showing potential for rigorous PCI development. The pilot database will store items to create the PCI, aiding the development of a concept‐based pharmacology curriculum.","PeriodicalId":19948,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacology Research & Perspectives","volume":"101 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacology Research & Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/prp2.70004","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Core Concepts of Pharmacology (CCP) initiative is developing educational resources to transform pharmacology education into a concept‐based approach. This study evaluated the quality of global educator‐created MCQs in generating items for the pharmacology concept inventory (PCI) instrument and developed as a resource for learning pharmacology fundamental concepts. A panel of 22 global pharmacology experts recruited from the CCP initiative research team participated in the MCQ pilot database design and evaluation. The quality analysis framework of the MCQs in the pilot database included four assessment tools: item writing guidelines (IWGs), Bloom's taxonomy, the CCP, and the MCQ design format. A two‐phase evaluation process was involved, including inter‐rater agreement on item quality, followed by resolving conflicts that occurred in quality assessment. The chi‐square (χ2) test of independence and Cramer's V correlation tests were utilized to measure the relationship among quality assessment attributes. About 200 MCQs were gathered and 98% underwent expert evaluation. Nearly 80% addressed one or more CCP, with 52% designed using a context‐dependent format. However, only 40% addressed higher levels of Bloom's cognitive domain and 10% adhered to all IWGs. A strong positive correlation was observed between the context‐based item format and its effectiveness in assessing the higher cognitive domain, the main CCP and improved IWGs adherence. Context‐based item construction can assess the higher cognitive skills and fundamental pharmacology concepts, showing potential for rigorous PCI development. The pilot database will store items to create the PCI, aiding the development of a concept‐based pharmacology curriculum.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估多选题试验数据库的质量:由全球教育工作者创建的基于概念的药理学学习工具
药理学核心概念(CCP)计划正在开发教育资源,以便将药理学教育转变为基于概念的方法。本研究评估了全球教育工作者创建的 MCQ 在生成药理学概念清单 (PCI) 工具项目方面的质量,并将其开发为学习药理学基本概念的资源。由 CCP 计划研究团队招募的 22 位全球药理学专家组成的专家小组参与了 MCQ 试验数据库的设计和评估。试点数据库中 MCQ 的质量分析框架包括四个评估工具:项目编写指南 (IWG)、布卢姆分类法、CCP 和 MCQ 设计格式。评估过程分为两个阶段,包括评分者之间就题目质量达成一致,然后解决质量评估中出现的冲突。研究采用了卡方(χ2)独立性检验和克莱默 V 相关检验来测量质量评估属性之间的关系。共收集了约 200 个 MCQ,其中 98% 经过了专家评估。近 80% 的 MCQ 涉及一个或多个 CCP,其中 52% 的设计采用了上下文相关的格式。然而,只有 40% 的试题涉及布卢姆认知领域的较高层次,10% 的试题符合所有 IWG。基于情境的题目格式与其在评估较高层次认知领域、主要 CCP 和改进 IWGs 遵循度方面的有效性之间存在很强的正相关性。基于情境的项目构建可以评估高级认知技能和基本药理学概念,显示了严格的 PCI 开发潜力。试点数据库将存储用于创建 PCI 的项目,有助于开发基于概念的药理学课程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
Pharmacology Research & Perspectives Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-General Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.80%
发文量
120
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: PR&P is jointly published by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics (ASPET), the British Pharmacological Society (BPS), and Wiley. PR&P is a bi-monthly open access journal that publishes a range of article types, including: target validation (preclinical papers that show a hypothesis is incorrect or papers on drugs that have failed in early clinical development); drug discovery reviews (strategy, hypotheses, and data resulting in a successful therapeutic drug); frontiers in translational medicine (drug and target validation for an unmet therapeutic need); pharmacological hypotheses (reviews that are oriented to inform a novel hypothesis); and replication studies (work that refutes key findings [failed replication] and work that validates key findings). PR&P publishes papers submitted directly to the journal and those referred from the journals of ASPET and the BPS
期刊最新文献
Higher dose antiviral therapy for herpes infections is associated with a risk of serious adverse events in older adults with chronic kidney disease. Obicetrapib exhibits favorable physiochemical and pharmacokinetic properties compared to previous cholesteryl ester transfer protein inhibitors: An integrated summary of results from non-human primate studies and clinical trials. Therapeutic potential of agents targeting cannabinoid type 2 receptors in organ fibrosis. The hydroxycarboxylic acid receptor HCA2 is required for the protective effect of ketogenic diet in epilepsy. The preclinical pharmacokinetics of Tolinapant-A dual cIAP1/XIAP antagonist with in vivo efficacy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1