Deficits in the knowledge of social norms and their underlying mechanisms in Alzheimer's disease

Thomas Carrier, Isabelle Rouleau, Marie-Anne St-Georges, Maxime Montembeault
{"title":"Deficits in the knowledge of social norms and their underlying mechanisms in Alzheimer's disease","authors":"Thomas Carrier, Isabelle Rouleau, Marie-Anne St-Georges, Maxime Montembeault","doi":"10.1101/2024.09.11.24312998","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Compared to other components of social cognition, knowledge of social norms has received less attention, even more in AD. While semantic memory deficits have been identified early in the AD disease course, no study has delved into the knowledge of social norms at these preliminary stages, although evidence suggests it shares common ground with semantic memory. Additionally, it is unclear whether the knowledge of social norms in AD is associated with deficits in social cognition, as seen in behavioral variant bvFTD. Finally, how social norms knowledge impairments predicts behaviours in real-world settings remains unknown in the context of AD. This study included 286 individuals suffering with MCI, 157 with AD, 285 with bvFTD along with 384 cognitively unimpaired older healthy controls (HC). Participants were selected from the National Alzheimers Coordinating Center. Participants completed the Social Norms Questionnaire (SNQ) which assesses the tendency to break or overadhere to social norms. They also completed tests assessing executive, semantic and socioemotional functions, along with tests measuring spontaneous interpersonal behaviours. Between-group comparisons show that individuals with AD and MCI break and overadhere to social norms significantly more than HC, while they perform better than individuals with bvFTD. Knowledge of social norms was mainly associated with semantic knowledge across groups (controlling for age, sex, education, and disease severity), and predicted insensitivity and disinhibition severity in patients. Altogether, this study extends findings of previous studies by focusing on social norms knowledge underlying mechanisms.","PeriodicalId":501388,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology","volume":"44 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.11.24312998","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Compared to other components of social cognition, knowledge of social norms has received less attention, even more in AD. While semantic memory deficits have been identified early in the AD disease course, no study has delved into the knowledge of social norms at these preliminary stages, although evidence suggests it shares common ground with semantic memory. Additionally, it is unclear whether the knowledge of social norms in AD is associated with deficits in social cognition, as seen in behavioral variant bvFTD. Finally, how social norms knowledge impairments predicts behaviours in real-world settings remains unknown in the context of AD. This study included 286 individuals suffering with MCI, 157 with AD, 285 with bvFTD along with 384 cognitively unimpaired older healthy controls (HC). Participants were selected from the National Alzheimers Coordinating Center. Participants completed the Social Norms Questionnaire (SNQ) which assesses the tendency to break or overadhere to social norms. They also completed tests assessing executive, semantic and socioemotional functions, along with tests measuring spontaneous interpersonal behaviours. Between-group comparisons show that individuals with AD and MCI break and overadhere to social norms significantly more than HC, while they perform better than individuals with bvFTD. Knowledge of social norms was mainly associated with semantic knowledge across groups (controlling for age, sex, education, and disease severity), and predicted insensitivity and disinhibition severity in patients. Altogether, this study extends findings of previous studies by focusing on social norms knowledge underlying mechanisms.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阿尔茨海默氏症患者对社会规范及其内在机制认识的缺陷
与社会认知的其他组成部分相比,社会规范知识受到的关注较少,在注意力缺失症中更是如此。虽然语义记忆缺陷已在注意力缺失症病程的早期被发现,但还没有研究深入探讨这些初步阶段的社会规范知识,尽管有证据表明它与语义记忆有共同之处。此外,目前还不清楚注意力缺失症的社会规范知识是否与行为变异型 bvFTD 的社会认知缺陷有关。最后,社会规范知识缺陷如何预测现实世界环境中的行为,在注意力缺失症中仍是未知数。这项研究包括286名MCI患者、157名AD患者、285名bvFTD患者以及384名认知能力未受损的老年健康对照组(HC)。研究对象选自国家阿尔茨海默氏症协调中心(National Alzheimers Coordinating Center)。受试者填写了社会规范问卷(SNQ),该问卷用于评估打破或过度遵守社会规范的倾向。他们还完成了评估执行、语义和社会情感功能的测试,以及测量自发人际行为的测试。组间比较显示,注意力缺失症和注意力缺失症患者违反和过度遵守社会规范的情况明显多于注意力缺失症患者,而他们的表现则优于注意力缺失和注意力缺失症患者。社会规范知识主要与各组的语义知识相关(控制年龄、性别、教育程度和疾病严重程度),并预测患者的不敏感和抑制严重程度。总之,本研究通过关注社会规范知识的内在机制,扩展了以往研究的发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Socio-medical Factors Associated with Neurodevelopmental Disorders on the Kenyan Coast Relationship between blood-cerebrospinal fluid barrier integrity, cardiometabolic and inflammatory factors in schizophrenia-spectrum disorders Whole-exome sequencing study of opioid dependence offers novel insights into the contributions of exome variants Mayo Normative Studies: regression-based normative data for remote self-administration of the Stricker Learning Span, Symbols Test and Mayo Test Drive Screening Battery Composite and validation in individuals with Mild Cognitive Impairment and dementia EEG frontal alpha asymmetry mediates the association between maternal and child internalizing symptoms in childhood
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1