Human iPSC-derived brain pericytes exhibit differences in inflammatory activation compared to primary human brain pericytes

Samuel McCullough, Eliene Albers, Akshata Anchan, Jane Yu, Simon Joseph O'Carroll, Bronwen Connor, Scott Graham
{"title":"Human iPSC-derived brain pericytes exhibit differences in inflammatory activation compared to primary human brain pericytes","authors":"Samuel McCullough, Eliene Albers, Akshata Anchan, Jane Yu, Simon Joseph O'Carroll, Bronwen Connor, Scott Graham","doi":"10.1101/2024.09.16.613375","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: iPSC-derived cells are increasingly used to model complex diseases in vitro because they can be patient derived and can differentiate into any cell in the adult human body. Recent studies have demonstrated the generation of brain pericytes using a neural crest-based differentiation protocol. However, the inflammatory response of these iPSC-derived brain pericytes has not been investigated. We aimed to investigate the response of iPSC-derived brain pericytes to common inflammatory stimuli, thereby assessing the suitability of these cells to study inflammatory disease. Methods: Brain pericytes were differentiated from iPSCs for 42 days. The expression of brain pericyte markers was assessed by RT-qPCR and immunofluorescent staining at days 0, 15, 21, and 42 of differentiation to validate the brain pericyte-like phenotype. Nuclear localisation of NFκB and STAT1 was assessed by immunofluorescence following IL-1β- and TNF-treatment in day 21 and day 42 iPSC-derived pericytes, and primary human pericytes. Cytometric bead array assessed the concentration of secreted inflammatory factors in the cell medium and phagocytosis was investigated using fluorescent carboxylated beads and flow cytometry. Results: At day 42 of differentiation, but not at day 21, cells expressed brain pericyte markers. Generally, iPSC-derived pericytes lacked consistent responses to inflammatory treatment compared to primary human pericytes. Day 21 and 42 iPSC-derived pericytes exhibited a NFκB response to IL-1β treatment comparable to primary human pericytes. Day 21 iPSC-derived pericytes exhibited a STAT1 response with IL-1β treatment which was absent in day 42 cells, but present in a subset of primary human pericytes. TNF treatment presented similar NFκB responses between day 21 and 42 iPSC-derived and primary human pericytes, but a STAT1 response was again present in a subset of primary human pericytes which was absent in both day 21 and day 42 iPSC-derived pericytes. Numerous differences were observed in the secretion of cytokines and chemokines following treatment of iPSC-derived and primary human pericytes with IL-1β and TNF. iPSC-derived pericytes exhibited greater rates of phagocytosis than primary human pericytes. Conclusions: With the increase in iPSC-derived cells in research, labs should undertake validation of lineage specificity when adapting an iPSC-derived differentiation protocol. In our hands, the inflammatory response of iPSC-derived pericytes was different to that of primary human pericytes, raising concern regarding the use of iPSC-derived pericytes to study neuroinflammatory disease.","PeriodicalId":501590,"journal":{"name":"bioRxiv - Cell Biology","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"bioRxiv - Cell Biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.16.613375","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: iPSC-derived cells are increasingly used to model complex diseases in vitro because they can be patient derived and can differentiate into any cell in the adult human body. Recent studies have demonstrated the generation of brain pericytes using a neural crest-based differentiation protocol. However, the inflammatory response of these iPSC-derived brain pericytes has not been investigated. We aimed to investigate the response of iPSC-derived brain pericytes to common inflammatory stimuli, thereby assessing the suitability of these cells to study inflammatory disease. Methods: Brain pericytes were differentiated from iPSCs for 42 days. The expression of brain pericyte markers was assessed by RT-qPCR and immunofluorescent staining at days 0, 15, 21, and 42 of differentiation to validate the brain pericyte-like phenotype. Nuclear localisation of NFκB and STAT1 was assessed by immunofluorescence following IL-1β- and TNF-treatment in day 21 and day 42 iPSC-derived pericytes, and primary human pericytes. Cytometric bead array assessed the concentration of secreted inflammatory factors in the cell medium and phagocytosis was investigated using fluorescent carboxylated beads and flow cytometry. Results: At day 42 of differentiation, but not at day 21, cells expressed brain pericyte markers. Generally, iPSC-derived pericytes lacked consistent responses to inflammatory treatment compared to primary human pericytes. Day 21 and 42 iPSC-derived pericytes exhibited a NFκB response to IL-1β treatment comparable to primary human pericytes. Day 21 iPSC-derived pericytes exhibited a STAT1 response with IL-1β treatment which was absent in day 42 cells, but present in a subset of primary human pericytes. TNF treatment presented similar NFκB responses between day 21 and 42 iPSC-derived and primary human pericytes, but a STAT1 response was again present in a subset of primary human pericytes which was absent in both day 21 and day 42 iPSC-derived pericytes. Numerous differences were observed in the secretion of cytokines and chemokines following treatment of iPSC-derived and primary human pericytes with IL-1β and TNF. iPSC-derived pericytes exhibited greater rates of phagocytosis than primary human pericytes. Conclusions: With the increase in iPSC-derived cells in research, labs should undertake validation of lineage specificity when adapting an iPSC-derived differentiation protocol. In our hands, the inflammatory response of iPSC-derived pericytes was different to that of primary human pericytes, raising concern regarding the use of iPSC-derived pericytes to study neuroinflammatory disease.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与原生人脑周细胞相比,iPSC 衍生的人脑周细胞在炎症激活方面表现出差异
背景:iPSC 衍生细胞越来越多地被用于复杂疾病的体外建模,因为它们可以来源于患者,并能分化成成人体内的任何细胞。最近的研究表明,使用基于神经嵴的分化方案可生成脑周细胞。然而,这些 iPSC 衍生的脑周细胞的炎症反应尚未得到研究。我们旨在研究 iPSC 衍生的脑周细胞对常见炎症刺激的反应,从而评估这些细胞是否适合研究炎症性疾病。研究方法用 iPSCs 分化脑周细胞 42 天。在分化的第 0、15、21 和 42 天,通过 RT-qPCR 和免疫荧光染色评估脑周细胞标记物的表达,以验证脑周细胞样表型。第 21 天和第 42 天 iPSC 衍生的周细胞和原代人类周细胞经 IL-1β 和 TNF 处理后,NFκB 和 STAT1 的核定位情况通过免疫荧光进行了评估。细胞计数珠阵列评估了细胞介质中分泌的炎症因子的浓度,荧光羧化珠和流式细胞术研究了吞噬作用。结果显示在分化的第 42 天,而不是第 21 天,细胞表达了脑周细胞标记。一般来说,与原代人类周细胞相比,iPSC衍生的周细胞对炎症处理缺乏一致的反应。第 21 天和第 42 天 iPSC 衍生的周细胞对 IL-1β 处理的 NFκB 反应与原代人类周细胞相当。第 21 天 iPSC 衍生的周细胞在 IL-1β 处理中表现出 STAT1 反应,这在第 42 天的细胞中不存在,但在原代人类周细胞的子集中存在。TNF 处理在第 21 天和第 42 天 iPSC 衍生的周细胞和原代人类周细胞中显示出相似的 NFκB 反应,但 STAT1 反应再次出现在原代人类周细胞的一个亚群中,而在第 21 天和第 42 天 iPSC 衍生的周细胞中都没有这种反应。在用 IL-1β 和 TNF 处理 iPSC 衍生细胞和原代人类周细胞后,观察到细胞因子和趋化因子的分泌存在许多差异。结论随着研究中 iPSC 衍生细胞的增加,实验室在调整 iPSC 衍生分化方案时应进行品系特异性验证。在我们手中,iPSC衍生的周细胞与原代人类周细胞的炎症反应不同,这引起了人们对使用iPSC衍生的周细胞研究神经炎症性疾病的担忧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Beta cell extracellular vesicle PD-L1 as a novel regulator of CD8+ T cell activity and biomarker during the evolution of Type 1 Diabetes Differential translocation of bacteriophages across the intestinal barrier in health and Crohn's disease Dynamic phosphorylation of Hcm1 promotes fitness in chronic stress Development of a cell-permeable Biotin-HaloTag ligand to explore functional differences between protein variants across cellular generations The role of disease state in confined migration
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1