{"title":"Amandys® versus four-corner fusion in patients aged over 50 years: long-term retrospective study in stage 3 wrist osteoarthritis","authors":"Aude Lozano, Caroline Cointat, Yves Bouju, Yves Kerjean, Flore-Anne Lecoq, Philippe Bellemère","doi":"10.1177/17531934241275480","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We compared the outcomes of the Amandys® implant and four-corner fusion in patients aged over 50 years with grade 3 wrist osteoarthritis and a mean follow-up of 5 years. Clinical assessments were of pain, mobility, strength, functional scores and satisfaction. Radiographs were taken. A total of 46 patients (mean age 63 years; 28 four-corner fusion and 21 Amandys®) were included. Pain relief, mobility and functional scores were not significantly different in the two groups at inclusion. At the last follow-up, wrist extension and grip were improved after Amandys® arthroplasty. Flexion decreased after four-corner fusion. One patient in the Amandys® group was not satisfied and one dislocation required repositioning of the implant. There were six nonunions, of which one required revision surgery in the four-corner fusion group. With the Amandys®, immobilization was shorter and mobility improved, making it a valid alternative to four-corner fusion especially in older patients.Level of evidence: IV","PeriodicalId":54813,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Surgery-European Volume","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hand Surgery-European Volume","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17531934241275480","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
We compared the outcomes of the Amandys® implant and four-corner fusion in patients aged over 50 years with grade 3 wrist osteoarthritis and a mean follow-up of 5 years. Clinical assessments were of pain, mobility, strength, functional scores and satisfaction. Radiographs were taken. A total of 46 patients (mean age 63 years; 28 four-corner fusion and 21 Amandys®) were included. Pain relief, mobility and functional scores were not significantly different in the two groups at inclusion. At the last follow-up, wrist extension and grip were improved after Amandys® arthroplasty. Flexion decreased after four-corner fusion. One patient in the Amandys® group was not satisfied and one dislocation required repositioning of the implant. There were six nonunions, of which one required revision surgery in the four-corner fusion group. With the Amandys®, immobilization was shorter and mobility improved, making it a valid alternative to four-corner fusion especially in older patients.Level of evidence: IV
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume) is essential reading for everyone involved in restoring the function to the hand and upper limb. Dedicated to the needs of hand, plastic, reconstructive and orthopaedic surgeons, it publishes the best selection of current papers on hand surgery.
The journal regularly highlights key developments in a range of original, authoritative and highly informative articles written by distinguished experts from around the world. Rapid coverage of the latest research, techniques, trends and ideas to make sure you stay up-to-date.
Subjects covered include:
joint replacement
fracture and joint injuries
microvascular surgery
congenital hand problems
You will also find editorials, book reviews, conference dates, case studies, detailed coverage of new techniques and full-length reviews articles.