Prognostic value of tumour-associated regulatory T-cells as a biomarker in non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 6.3 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Systematic Reviews Pub Date : 2024-09-14 DOI:10.1186/s13643-024-02642-w
Kapil Khambholja, Manish Gehani, Rushabh Kothari, Sachin Marulkar
{"title":"Prognostic value of tumour-associated regulatory T-cells as a biomarker in non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Kapil Khambholja, Manish Gehani, Rushabh Kothari, Sachin Marulkar","doi":"10.1186/s13643-024-02642-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Tumour, nodes, and metastases (TNM) staging has been deficient in prognosticating in patients suffering from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). To supplement TNM staging, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of the regulatory T cells (Treg). A keyword search was conducted in MEDLINE and EMBASE for full-text original human studies from any region published in English during the last 12 years. Eligible for inclusion were studies evaluating the prognostic value of the number of Treg cells in NSCLC except case studies, case series, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses. Two reviewers (one reviewer used an automation tool) independently screened the studies and assessed risk-of-bias using the Quality in Prognosis Studies (QUIPS) tool. Meta-analysis was done for studies reporting significant multivariate hazard ratio (HR). Out of 809 retrievals, 24 studies were included in the final review. The low number of Treg cells was found significantly associated with improved overall survival (pooled log OR, 1.646; 95% CI, 1.349, 1.944; p (2-tailed) < .001; SE, 0.1217), improved recurrence-free survival (HR, 1.99; 95% CI, 1.15, 3.46; p = .01), improved progression-free survival (pooled log OR, 2.231; 95% CI, 0.424, 4.038; p (2-tailed) .034; SE, 0.4200), and worse disease-free survival (pooled log OR, 0.992; 95% CI, 0.820, 1.163; p (2-tailed) .009; SE, 0.0135), especially when identified by forkhead box P3 (FOXP3), in any stage or non-metastatic NSCLC. A low number of Treg cells indicated better survival, suggesting its potential use as a prognostic biomarker in NSCLC. The protocol of this review was prospectively registered on PROSPERO on August 28, 2021, and was assigned the registration number CRD42021270598. The protocol can be accessed from PROSPERO website.","PeriodicalId":22162,"journal":{"name":"Systematic Reviews","volume":"51 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Systematic Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-024-02642-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Tumour, nodes, and metastases (TNM) staging has been deficient in prognosticating in patients suffering from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). To supplement TNM staging, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of the regulatory T cells (Treg). A keyword search was conducted in MEDLINE and EMBASE for full-text original human studies from any region published in English during the last 12 years. Eligible for inclusion were studies evaluating the prognostic value of the number of Treg cells in NSCLC except case studies, case series, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses. Two reviewers (one reviewer used an automation tool) independently screened the studies and assessed risk-of-bias using the Quality in Prognosis Studies (QUIPS) tool. Meta-analysis was done for studies reporting significant multivariate hazard ratio (HR). Out of 809 retrievals, 24 studies were included in the final review. The low number of Treg cells was found significantly associated with improved overall survival (pooled log OR, 1.646; 95% CI, 1.349, 1.944; p (2-tailed) < .001; SE, 0.1217), improved recurrence-free survival (HR, 1.99; 95% CI, 1.15, 3.46; p = .01), improved progression-free survival (pooled log OR, 2.231; 95% CI, 0.424, 4.038; p (2-tailed) .034; SE, 0.4200), and worse disease-free survival (pooled log OR, 0.992; 95% CI, 0.820, 1.163; p (2-tailed) .009; SE, 0.0135), especially when identified by forkhead box P3 (FOXP3), in any stage or non-metastatic NSCLC. A low number of Treg cells indicated better survival, suggesting its potential use as a prognostic biomarker in NSCLC. The protocol of this review was prospectively registered on PROSPERO on August 28, 2021, and was assigned the registration number CRD42021270598. The protocol can be accessed from PROSPERO website.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肿瘤相关调节性 T 细胞作为非小细胞肺癌生物标志物的预后价值:系统综述和荟萃分析
肿瘤、结节和转移灶(TNM)分期在预测非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者的预后方面一直存在缺陷。作为对 TNM 分期的补充,本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在评估调节性 T 细胞(Treg)的预后价值。我们在 MEDLINE 和 EMBASE 中检索了过去 12 年间在任何地区以英语发表的人类原始研究全文,并进行了关键词检索。除病例研究、系列病例、系统综述和荟萃分析外,评估Treg细胞数量对NSCLC预后价值的研究均可纳入。两名审稿人(其中一名审稿人使用自动化工具)独立筛选研究,并使用预后研究质量(QUIPS)工具评估偏倚风险。对报告了显著多变量危险比(HR)的研究进行了 Meta 分析。在 809 项检索中,有 24 项研究被纳入最终审查。研究发现,Treg细胞数量少与总生存期改善(集合对数OR,1.646;95% CI,1.349,1.944;P(2尾)< .001;SE,0.1217)、无复发生存期改善(HR,1.99;95% CI,1.15,3.46;P = .01)、无进展生存期改善(集合对数OR,2.231;95% CI,0.424,4.038;p(2-tailed).034;SE,0.4200),无病生存期更差(集合对数OR,0.992;95% CI,0.820,1.163;p(2-tailed).009;SE,0.0135),尤其是在任何分期或非转移性NSCLC中通过叉头盒P3(FOXP3)识别时。Treg细胞数量越少,生存率越高,这表明它有可能被用作NSCLC的预后生物标志物。本综述方案于2021年8月28日在PROSPERO上进行了前瞻性注册,注册号为CRD42021270598。该方案可在 PROSPERO 网站上查阅。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Systematic Reviews
Systematic Reviews Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
241
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Systematic Reviews encompasses all aspects of the design, conduct and reporting of systematic reviews. The journal publishes high quality systematic review products including systematic review protocols, systematic reviews related to a very broad definition of health, rapid reviews, updates of already completed systematic reviews, and methods research related to the science of systematic reviews, such as decision modelling. At this time Systematic Reviews does not accept reviews of in vitro studies. The journal also aims to ensure that the results of all well-conducted systematic reviews are published, regardless of their outcome.
期刊最新文献
Choice of primary healthcare providers among population in urban areas of low- and middle-income countries-a protocol for systematic review of literature. Computer-assisted screening in systematic evidence synthesis requires robust and well-evaluated stopping criteria. Patient-related prognostic factors for function and pain after shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review. The psychometric properties of instruments measuring ethical sensitivity in nursing: a systematic review. Barriers and facilitators to enrollment in pediatric clinical trials: an overview of systematic reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1