{"title":"Hyperformalism for Bunched Natural Deduction Systems","authors":"Shay Allen Logan, Blane Worley","doi":"arxiv-2409.10418","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Logics closed under classes of substitutions broader than class of uniform\nsubstitutions are known as hyperformal logics. This paper extends known results\nabout hyperformal logics in two ways. First: we examine a very powerful form of\nhyperformalism that tracks, for bunched natural deduction systems, essentially\nall the intensional content that can possibly be tracked. We demonstrate that,\nafter a few tweaks, the well-known relevant logic $\\mathbf{B}$ exhibits this\nform of hyperformalism. Second: we demonstrate that not only can hyperformalism\nbe extended along these lines, it can also be extended to accommodate not just\nwhat is proved in a given logic but the proofs themselves. Altogether, the\npaper demonstrates that the space of possibilities for the study of\nhyperformalism is much larger than might have been expected.","PeriodicalId":501306,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - MATH - Logic","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - MATH - Logic","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.10418","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Logics closed under classes of substitutions broader than class of uniform
substitutions are known as hyperformal logics. This paper extends known results
about hyperformal logics in two ways. First: we examine a very powerful form of
hyperformalism that tracks, for bunched natural deduction systems, essentially
all the intensional content that can possibly be tracked. We demonstrate that,
after a few tweaks, the well-known relevant logic $\mathbf{B}$ exhibits this
form of hyperformalism. Second: we demonstrate that not only can hyperformalism
be extended along these lines, it can also be extended to accommodate not just
what is proved in a given logic but the proofs themselves. Altogether, the
paper demonstrates that the space of possibilities for the study of
hyperformalism is much larger than might have been expected.