Course and trajectories of insulin resistance, incident heart failure and all-cause mortality in nondiabetic people

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 Medicine Endocrine Pub Date : 2024-09-18 DOI:10.1007/s12020-024-04037-2
Zailing Xing, Douglas D. Schocken, Janice C. Zgibor, Amy C. Alman
{"title":"Course and trajectories of insulin resistance, incident heart failure and all-cause mortality in nondiabetic people","authors":"Zailing Xing, Douglas D. Schocken, Janice C. Zgibor, Amy C. Alman","doi":"10.1007/s12020-024-04037-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background</h3><p>In nondiabetic people, the long-term effects of insulin resistance (IR) on heart failure (HF) and all-cause mortality have not been studied.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Objectives</h3><p>To examine the association between IR trajectories and incident HF and all-cause mortality in a nondiabetic population.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>We studied 7835 nondiabetic participants from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study. We estimated IR with several methods: Homeostatic Model Assessment-Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR), triglyceride to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio (TG/HDL-C), triglyceride glucose Index (TyG Index), and metabolic score for insulin resistance (METS-IR). The latent class analysis identified two trajectories for HOMA-IR (‘low level’ and ‘high level’), and three trajectories for TG/HDL-C, TyG index, and METS-IR (‘low level’, ‘moderate level’, and ‘high level’). Cox proportional hazard models were employed to examine the association.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Participants in the ‘high level’ group of HOMA-IR trajectory patterns were more likely to have incident HF and all-cause mortality with HRs (95% CIs) of 1.29 (1.11–1.50) and 1.31(1.19–1.44), respectively, compared to the ‘low level’ group. Similarly, participants in the ‘moderate level’ and ‘high level’ groups of TG/HDL-C, TyG index, and METS-IR trajectories had elevated risks of incident HF and all-cause mortality. However, no increased risk was found for all-cause mortality for men in the ‘moderate level’ and ‘high level’ group of TG/HDL-C, TyG index, and METS-IR relative to the ‘low level’ group.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>Long-term moderate and high IR levels were positively associated with increased risks of incident HF for both males and females. For all-cause mortality, however, consistent associations were found only in women.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Graphical Abstract</h3>","PeriodicalId":11572,"journal":{"name":"Endocrine","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endocrine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020-024-04037-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

In nondiabetic people, the long-term effects of insulin resistance (IR) on heart failure (HF) and all-cause mortality have not been studied.

Objectives

To examine the association between IR trajectories and incident HF and all-cause mortality in a nondiabetic population.

Methods

We studied 7835 nondiabetic participants from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study. We estimated IR with several methods: Homeostatic Model Assessment-Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR), triglyceride to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio (TG/HDL-C), triglyceride glucose Index (TyG Index), and metabolic score for insulin resistance (METS-IR). The latent class analysis identified two trajectories for HOMA-IR (‘low level’ and ‘high level’), and three trajectories for TG/HDL-C, TyG index, and METS-IR (‘low level’, ‘moderate level’, and ‘high level’). Cox proportional hazard models were employed to examine the association.

Results

Participants in the ‘high level’ group of HOMA-IR trajectory patterns were more likely to have incident HF and all-cause mortality with HRs (95% CIs) of 1.29 (1.11–1.50) and 1.31(1.19–1.44), respectively, compared to the ‘low level’ group. Similarly, participants in the ‘moderate level’ and ‘high level’ groups of TG/HDL-C, TyG index, and METS-IR trajectories had elevated risks of incident HF and all-cause mortality. However, no increased risk was found for all-cause mortality for men in the ‘moderate level’ and ‘high level’ group of TG/HDL-C, TyG index, and METS-IR relative to the ‘low level’ group.

Conclusions

Long-term moderate and high IR levels were positively associated with increased risks of incident HF for both males and females. For all-cause mortality, however, consistent associations were found only in women.

Graphical Abstract

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非糖尿病患者胰岛素抵抗、心力衰竭事件和全因死亡率的过程和轨迹
背景在非糖尿病人群中,胰岛素抵抗(IR)对心力衰竭(HF)和全因死亡率的长期影响尚未得到研究。方法我们对社区动脉粥样硬化风险(ARIC)研究中的 7835 名非糖尿病参与者进行了研究。我们用多种方法估算了IR:胰岛素抵抗自律模型评估(HOMA-IR)、甘油三酯与高密度脂蛋白胆固醇比值(TG/HDL-C)、甘油三酯葡萄糖指数(TyG指数)和胰岛素抵抗代谢评分(METS-IR)。潜类分析确定了 HOMA-IR 的两个轨迹("低水平 "和 "高水平"),以及 TG/HDL-C、TyG 指数和 METS-IR 的三个轨迹("低水平"、"中等水平 "和 "高水平")。结果与 "低水平 "组相比,HOMA-IR轨迹模式 "高水平 "组的参与者更有可能发生心房颤动和全因死亡,HR值(95% CI)分别为1.29(1.11-1.50)和1.31(1.19-1.44)。同样,TG/HDL-C、TyG 指数和 METS-IR 轨迹 "中等水平 "组和 "高水平 "组的参与者发生心房颤动和全因死亡的风险也较高。然而,与 "低水平 "组相比,TG/HDL-C、TyG 指数和 METS-IR 的 "中等水平 "组和 "高水平 "组男性的全因死亡率风险没有增加。然而,就全因死亡率而言,仅在女性中发现了一致的关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Endocrine
Endocrine 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
5.40%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Well-established as a major journal in today’s rapidly advancing experimental and clinical research areas, Endocrine publishes original articles devoted to basic (including molecular, cellular and physiological studies), translational and clinical research in all the different fields of endocrinology and metabolism. Articles will be accepted based on peer-reviews, priority, and editorial decision. Invited reviews, mini-reviews and viewpoints on relevant pathophysiological and clinical topics, as well as Editorials on articles appearing in the Journal, are published. Unsolicited Editorials will be evaluated by the editorial team. Outcomes of scientific meetings, as well as guidelines and position statements, may be submitted. The Journal also considers special feature articles in the field of endocrine genetics and epigenetics, as well as articles devoted to novel methods and techniques in endocrinology. Endocrine covers controversial, clinical endocrine issues. Meta-analyses on endocrine and metabolic topics are also accepted. Descriptions of single clinical cases and/or small patients studies are not published unless of exceptional interest. However, reports of novel imaging studies and endocrine side effects in single patients may be considered. Research letters and letters to the editor related or unrelated to recently published articles can be submitted. Endocrine covers leading topics in endocrinology such as neuroendocrinology, pituitary and hypothalamic peptides, thyroid physiological and clinical aspects, bone and mineral metabolism and osteoporosis, obesity, lipid and energy metabolism and food intake control, insulin, Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes, hormones of male and female reproduction, adrenal diseases pediatric and geriatric endocrinology, endocrine hypertension and endocrine oncology.
期刊最新文献
Correction: Comparison between surgical and non-surgical management of primary hyperparathyroidism during pregnancy: a systematic review. Women and lipoprotein apheresis: another side of gender medicine. Diabetes current and future translatable therapies. Timing of the repeat thyroid fine-needle aspiration biopsy: does early repeat biopsy change the rate of nondiagnostic or atypia of undetermined significance cytology result? A comparison of brown fat tissue related hormone levels in metabolically healthy and unhealthy individuals with obesity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1