A Cross-Sectional Survey of Fixed-Dose Combination Antihypertensive Medicine Prescribing in Twenty-Four Countries, Including Qualitative Insights.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Global Heart Pub Date : 2024-09-12 DOI:10.5334/gh.1353
Edel O'Hagan,Daniel McIntyre,Tu Nguyen,Kit Mun Tan,Peter Hanlon,Maha Siddiqui,Dzudie Anastase,Toon Wei Lim,Anezi Uzendu,Tan Van Nguyen,Wei Jin Wong,Hui Min Khor,Pramod Kumar,Timothy Usherwood,Clara K Chow
{"title":"A Cross-Sectional Survey of Fixed-Dose Combination Antihypertensive Medicine Prescribing in Twenty-Four Countries, Including Qualitative Insights.","authors":"Edel O'Hagan,Daniel McIntyre,Tu Nguyen,Kit Mun Tan,Peter Hanlon,Maha Siddiqui,Dzudie Anastase,Toon Wei Lim,Anezi Uzendu,Tan Van Nguyen,Wei Jin Wong,Hui Min Khor,Pramod Kumar,Timothy Usherwood,Clara K Chow","doi":"10.5334/gh.1353","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background\r\nTreatment inertia, non-adherence and non-persistence to medical treatment contribute to poor blood pressure (BP) control worldwide. Fixed dose combination (FDC) antihypertensive medicines simplify prescribing patterns and improve adherence. The aim of this study was to identify factors associated with prescribing FDC antihypertensive medicines and to understand if these factors differ among doctors worldwide.\r\n\r\nMethods\r\nA cross-sectional survey was conducted online from June 2023 to January 2024 to recruit doctors. We collaborated with an international network of researchers and clinicians identified through institutional connections. A passive snowballing recruitment strategy was employed, where network members forwarded the survey link to their clinical colleagues. The survey instrument, developed through a literature review, interviews with academic and clinical researchers, and pilot testing, assessed participants perspectives on prescribing FDC antihypertensive medicines for hypertension. Participants rated their level of agreement (5-point Likert scale) with statements representing six barriers and four facilitators to FDC use.\r\n\r\nFindings\r\nData from 191 surveys were available for analysis. 25% (n = 47) of participants worked in high-income countries, 38% (n = 73) in upper-middle income, 25% (n = 48) in lower-middle income, 6% (n = 10) in low-income countries. Forty percent (n = 70) of participants were between 36-45 years of age; two thirds were male. Cost was reported as a barrier to prescribing FDC antihypertensive medicines [51% (n = 87) agreeing or strongly agreeing], followed by doctors' confidence in BP measured in clinic [40%, (n = 70)], access [37%, (n = 67)], appointment duration [35%, (n = 61)], concerns about side-effects [(21%, n = 37)], and non-adherence [12%, (n = 21)]. Facilitators to FDC antihypertensive polypills prescribing were clinician facing, such as access to educational supports [79%, (n = 143)], more BP measurement data [67%, (n = 120)], a clinical nudge in health records [61%, (n = 109)] and patient-facing including improved patient health literacy [49%, (n = 88)]. The levels of agreement and strong agreement across all barriers and facilitators were similar for participants working in higher or lower income countries. Across all countries, participants rated FDC antihypertensive medications highly valuable for managing patients with non-adherence, (82% reported high or very high value), for patients with high pill burden (80%).\r\n\r\nInterpretation\r\nCost and access were the most common barriers to prescribing FDCs across high- and low-income countries. While greater educational support for clinicians was perceived as the leading potential facilitator of FDC use, this seems unlikely to be effective without addressing access.","PeriodicalId":56018,"journal":{"name":"Global Heart","volume":"108 1","pages":"73"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Heart","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5334/gh.1353","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Treatment inertia, non-adherence and non-persistence to medical treatment contribute to poor blood pressure (BP) control worldwide. Fixed dose combination (FDC) antihypertensive medicines simplify prescribing patterns and improve adherence. The aim of this study was to identify factors associated with prescribing FDC antihypertensive medicines and to understand if these factors differ among doctors worldwide. Methods A cross-sectional survey was conducted online from June 2023 to January 2024 to recruit doctors. We collaborated with an international network of researchers and clinicians identified through institutional connections. A passive snowballing recruitment strategy was employed, where network members forwarded the survey link to their clinical colleagues. The survey instrument, developed through a literature review, interviews with academic and clinical researchers, and pilot testing, assessed participants perspectives on prescribing FDC antihypertensive medicines for hypertension. Participants rated their level of agreement (5-point Likert scale) with statements representing six barriers and four facilitators to FDC use. Findings Data from 191 surveys were available for analysis. 25% (n = 47) of participants worked in high-income countries, 38% (n = 73) in upper-middle income, 25% (n = 48) in lower-middle income, 6% (n = 10) in low-income countries. Forty percent (n = 70) of participants were between 36-45 years of age; two thirds were male. Cost was reported as a barrier to prescribing FDC antihypertensive medicines [51% (n = 87) agreeing or strongly agreeing], followed by doctors' confidence in BP measured in clinic [40%, (n = 70)], access [37%, (n = 67)], appointment duration [35%, (n = 61)], concerns about side-effects [(21%, n = 37)], and non-adherence [12%, (n = 21)]. Facilitators to FDC antihypertensive polypills prescribing were clinician facing, such as access to educational supports [79%, (n = 143)], more BP measurement data [67%, (n = 120)], a clinical nudge in health records [61%, (n = 109)] and patient-facing including improved patient health literacy [49%, (n = 88)]. The levels of agreement and strong agreement across all barriers and facilitators were similar for participants working in higher or lower income countries. Across all countries, participants rated FDC antihypertensive medications highly valuable for managing patients with non-adherence, (82% reported high or very high value), for patients with high pill burden (80%). Interpretation Cost and access were the most common barriers to prescribing FDCs across high- and low-income countries. While greater educational support for clinicians was perceived as the leading potential facilitator of FDC use, this seems unlikely to be effective without addressing access.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
二十四个国家固定剂量联合抗高血压药物处方横断面调查,包括定性分析。
背景治疗惰性、不依从性和不坚持治疗是导致全球血压(BP)控制不佳的原因。固定剂量组合(FDC)降压药简化了处方模式并提高了依从性。本研究旨在确定与开具 FDC 抗高血压药物处方相关的因素,并了解这些因素在全球医生中是否存在差异。方法 我们于 2023 年 6 月至 2024 年 1 月在网上进行了横断面调查,招募医生。我们与通过机构关系确定的研究人员和临床医生国际网络合作。我们采用了 "滚雪球 "式的被动招募策略,即网络成员将调查链接转发给他们的临床同事。通过文献回顾、与学术和临床研究人员的访谈以及试点测试,我们开发了调查工具,用于评估参与者对开具 FDC 抗高血压药物治疗高血压的看法。参与者对代表 FDC 使用的六种障碍和四种促进因素的陈述进行同意程度评分(5 分李克特量表)。25%(n = 47)的参与者在高收入国家工作,38%(n = 73)在中高收入国家工作,25%(n = 48)在中低收入国家工作,6%(n = 10)在低收入国家工作。40%(n = 70)的参与者年龄在 36-45 岁之间;三分之二为男性。据报告,费用是开具 FDC 抗高血压药物处方的障碍[51%(n = 87)同意或非常同意],其次是医生对在诊所测量血压的信心[40%(n = 70)]、就医途径[37%(n = 67)]、预约时间[35%(n = 61)]、对副作用的担忧[(21%,n = 37)]和不依从性[12%(n = 21)]。开具 FDC 降压药处方的促进因素主要面向临床医生,如获得教育支持[79%,(n = 143)]、更多的血压测量数据[67%,(n = 120)]、健康记录中的临床提示[61%,(n = 109)]以及面向患者,包括提高患者的健康素养[49%,(n = 88)]。在收入较高或较低国家工作的参与者对所有障碍和促进因素的同意和非常同意程度相似。在所有国家,参与者都认为 FDC 降压药物对于管理不依从性患者(82% 的人认为有很高或非常高的价值)和药片负担重的患者(80%)具有很高的价值。虽然加强对临床医生的教育支持被认为是使用 FDC 的主要潜在促进因素,但如果不解决获取问题,这似乎不太可能有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Global Heart
Global Heart Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
5.40%
发文量
77
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊介绍: Global Heart offers a forum for dialogue and education on research, developments, trends, solutions and public health programs related to the prevention and control of cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) worldwide, with a special focus on low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Manuscripts should address not only the extent or epidemiology of the problem, but also describe interventions to effectively control and prevent CVDs and the underlying factors. The emphasis should be on approaches applicable in settings with limited resources. Economic evaluations of successful interventions are particularly welcome. We will also consider negative findings if important. While reports of hospital or clinic-based treatments are not excluded, particularly if they have broad implications for cost-effective disease control or prevention, we give priority to papers addressing community-based activities. We encourage submissions on cardiovascular surveillance and health policies, professional education, ethical issues and technological innovations related to prevention. Global Heart is particularly interested in publishing data from updated national or regional demographic health surveys, World Health Organization or Global Burden of Disease data, large clinical disease databases or registries. Systematic reviews or meta-analyses on globally relevant topics are welcome. We will also consider clinical research that has special relevance to LMICs, e.g. using validated instruments to assess health-related quality-of-life in patients from LMICs, innovative diagnostic-therapeutic applications, real-world effectiveness clinical trials, research methods (innovative methodologic papers, with emphasis on low-cost research methods or novel application of methods in low resource settings), and papers pertaining to cardiovascular health promotion and policy (quantitative evaluation of health programs.
期刊最新文献
Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice of the Lebanese University Medical Students and Junior Doctors on Basic Life Support Practices. Lessons Learnt from HIV and Noncommunicable Disease Healthcare Integration in Sub-Saharan Africa. Imaging and Circulating Biomarker-Defined Cardiac Pathology in Pulmonary Tuberculosis: A Systematic Review. Causal Links Between Renal Function and Cardiac Structure, Function, and Disease Risk. Clearing the Air to Address Pollution's Cardiovascular Health Crisis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1