Gender Differential Prevalence of Overweight and Obesity, Hypertension and Diabetes in South India: A Population-Based Cross-Sectional Study.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Global Heart Pub Date : 2024-09-09 DOI:10.5334/gh.1354
Mohanraj Sundaresan,Ganesan Velmurugan,Mani Dhivakar,Arulraj Ramakrishnan,Mathew Cherian,Thomas Alexander,Krishnan Swaminathan
{"title":"Gender Differential Prevalence of Overweight and Obesity, Hypertension and Diabetes in South India: A Population-Based Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Mohanraj Sundaresan,Ganesan Velmurugan,Mani Dhivakar,Arulraj Ramakrishnan,Mathew Cherian,Thomas Alexander,Krishnan Swaminathan","doi":"10.5334/gh.1354","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background\r\nIndia is facing triple epidemic of Non communicable diseases (NCDs) including high body mass index (BMI), high blood pressure and high blood glucose, contributing to more than half of deaths of all mortality, however, information in different demographics is limited, especially, in India. The aim of the study is to compare the prevalence of overweight, obesity, hypertension, and diabetes, along with the occurrence of multi-morbidity, across gender-specific populations in rural, suburban, and urban regions of India.\r\n\r\nMethods\r\nThis was a cross-sectional, population-based study including adults aged 20 and above in rural, suburban, and urban areas near Coimbatore, India. All participants were interviewed using a detailed questionnaire and had their anthropometric measurements, including height, weight, blood pressure, and blood samples collected. Gender specific and location specific prevalence of overweight, obesity, hypertension, diabetes, and multimorbidity were assessed.\r\n\r\nResults\r\nThis study included 2976 individuals, of which 865 were from rural areas, 1030 from sub-urban areas, and 1081 from metropolitan areas. The mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure were higher in rural participants than in sub-urban and urban participants, despite the fact that the prevalence of hypertension was higher in sub-urban (47.1%) than in rural (36.4%) and urban (39.7%, p < 0.001). In sub-group analysis, sub-urban areas had a greater prevalence of hypertension in both men and women (53.5% and 41.7%, p < 0.001) than rural areas (41.9% and 31.3%, p = 0.001) or urban areas (45.9% and 35.5%, p < 0.001). Compared to rural (16.1%) and urban (23%), sub-urban areas had a greater prevalence of diabetes (25.8%, p < 0.001). Urban residents (47.5%) had higher rates of overweight and obesity than rural (31.4%) and sub-urban (34.1%, p < 0.001) residents. The association between diabetes and hypertension was present in the unadjusted model and persisted even after age and BMI adjustments. Though not in men, higher levels of education were associated to a higher prevalence of diabetes in women. Diabetes was associated to being overweight or obese in women, however this association was significantly reduced once BMI was taken into account. The overall multimorbidity was 3.8%, however, women had a higher overlapping prevalence (2.8%) compared to men (1%, p < 0.001).\r\n\r\nConclusions\r\nDiabetes and hypertension were prevalent comorbidities across all demographics, with higher rates in suburban and urban areas. Women exhibited higher rates of multimorbidity than men, regardless of the demographic area.","PeriodicalId":56018,"journal":{"name":"Global Heart","volume":"49 1","pages":"72"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Heart","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5334/gh.1354","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background India is facing triple epidemic of Non communicable diseases (NCDs) including high body mass index (BMI), high blood pressure and high blood glucose, contributing to more than half of deaths of all mortality, however, information in different demographics is limited, especially, in India. The aim of the study is to compare the prevalence of overweight, obesity, hypertension, and diabetes, along with the occurrence of multi-morbidity, across gender-specific populations in rural, suburban, and urban regions of India. Methods This was a cross-sectional, population-based study including adults aged 20 and above in rural, suburban, and urban areas near Coimbatore, India. All participants were interviewed using a detailed questionnaire and had their anthropometric measurements, including height, weight, blood pressure, and blood samples collected. Gender specific and location specific prevalence of overweight, obesity, hypertension, diabetes, and multimorbidity were assessed. Results This study included 2976 individuals, of which 865 were from rural areas, 1030 from sub-urban areas, and 1081 from metropolitan areas. The mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure were higher in rural participants than in sub-urban and urban participants, despite the fact that the prevalence of hypertension was higher in sub-urban (47.1%) than in rural (36.4%) and urban (39.7%, p < 0.001). In sub-group analysis, sub-urban areas had a greater prevalence of hypertension in both men and women (53.5% and 41.7%, p < 0.001) than rural areas (41.9% and 31.3%, p = 0.001) or urban areas (45.9% and 35.5%, p < 0.001). Compared to rural (16.1%) and urban (23%), sub-urban areas had a greater prevalence of diabetes (25.8%, p < 0.001). Urban residents (47.5%) had higher rates of overweight and obesity than rural (31.4%) and sub-urban (34.1%, p < 0.001) residents. The association between diabetes and hypertension was present in the unadjusted model and persisted even after age and BMI adjustments. Though not in men, higher levels of education were associated to a higher prevalence of diabetes in women. Diabetes was associated to being overweight or obese in women, however this association was significantly reduced once BMI was taken into account. The overall multimorbidity was 3.8%, however, women had a higher overlapping prevalence (2.8%) compared to men (1%, p < 0.001). Conclusions Diabetes and hypertension were prevalent comorbidities across all demographics, with higher rates in suburban and urban areas. Women exhibited higher rates of multimorbidity than men, regardless of the demographic area.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
南印度超重和肥胖、高血压和糖尿病的性别差异流行率:一项基于人口的横断面研究。
背景印度正面临着非传染性疾病 (NCD) 的三重流行,包括高体重指数 (BMI)、高血压和高血糖,这些疾病导致了一半以上的死亡,然而,不同人口统计数据的信息却很有限,尤其是在印度。本研究的目的是比较印度农村、郊区和城市地区不同性别人群的超重、肥胖、高血压和糖尿病发病率,以及多重疾病的发生率。所有参与者都接受了详细的问卷调查,并进行了人体测量,包括身高、体重、血压和血样采集。研究评估了超重、肥胖、高血压、糖尿病和多病症的性别和地区患病率。结果这项研究共纳入 2976 人,其中 865 人来自农村地区,1030 人来自城郊地区,1081 人来自大都市地区。尽管郊区(47.1%)的高血压患病率高于农村(36.4%)和城市(39.7%,P < 0.001),但农村参与者的平均收缩压和舒张压均高于郊区和城市参与者。在分组分析中,城郊地区男性和女性的高血压患病率(53.5% 和 41.7%,p < 0.001)高于农村地区(41.9% 和 31.3%,p = 0.001)或城市地区(45.9% 和 35.5%,p < 0.001)。与农村(16.1%)和城市(23%)相比,城郊地区的糖尿病患病率更高(25.8%,p < 0.001)。城市居民(47.5%)的超重和肥胖率高于农村居民(31.4%)和城市郊区居民(34.1%,P < 0.001)。在未调整模型中,糖尿病与高血压之间存在关联,即使在调整了年龄和体重指数后,这种关联依然存在。教育水平越高,女性糖尿病患病率越高,但男性则不然。糖尿病与女性超重或肥胖有关,但一旦考虑到体重指数,这种关联就会显著降低。结论糖尿病和高血压是所有人口统计学特征中普遍存在的合并症,在郊区和城市地区发病率更高。无论在哪个人口统计学区域,女性的多病症发病率都高于男性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Global Heart
Global Heart Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
5.40%
发文量
77
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊介绍: Global Heart offers a forum for dialogue and education on research, developments, trends, solutions and public health programs related to the prevention and control of cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) worldwide, with a special focus on low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Manuscripts should address not only the extent or epidemiology of the problem, but also describe interventions to effectively control and prevent CVDs and the underlying factors. The emphasis should be on approaches applicable in settings with limited resources. Economic evaluations of successful interventions are particularly welcome. We will also consider negative findings if important. While reports of hospital or clinic-based treatments are not excluded, particularly if they have broad implications for cost-effective disease control or prevention, we give priority to papers addressing community-based activities. We encourage submissions on cardiovascular surveillance and health policies, professional education, ethical issues and technological innovations related to prevention. Global Heart is particularly interested in publishing data from updated national or regional demographic health surveys, World Health Organization or Global Burden of Disease data, large clinical disease databases or registries. Systematic reviews or meta-analyses on globally relevant topics are welcome. We will also consider clinical research that has special relevance to LMICs, e.g. using validated instruments to assess health-related quality-of-life in patients from LMICs, innovative diagnostic-therapeutic applications, real-world effectiveness clinical trials, research methods (innovative methodologic papers, with emphasis on low-cost research methods or novel application of methods in low resource settings), and papers pertaining to cardiovascular health promotion and policy (quantitative evaluation of health programs.
期刊最新文献
Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice of the Lebanese University Medical Students and Junior Doctors on Basic Life Support Practices. Lessons Learnt from HIV and Noncommunicable Disease Healthcare Integration in Sub-Saharan Africa. Imaging and Circulating Biomarker-Defined Cardiac Pathology in Pulmonary Tuberculosis: A Systematic Review. Causal Links Between Renal Function and Cardiac Structure, Function, and Disease Risk. Clearing the Air to Address Pollution's Cardiovascular Health Crisis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1