Real-time continuous glucose monitoring vs. self-monitoring of blood glucose: cost-utility in South Korean type 2 diabetes patients on intensive insulin.

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of Medical Economics Pub Date : 2024-09-14 DOI:10.1080/13696998.2024.2405293
Ji Yoon Kim,Sabrina Ilham,Hamza Alshannaq,Richard F Pollock,Waqas Ahmed,Gregory J Norman,Sang-Man Jin,Jae Hyeon Kim
{"title":"Real-time continuous glucose monitoring vs. self-monitoring of blood glucose: cost-utility in South Korean type 2 diabetes patients on intensive insulin.","authors":"Ji Yoon Kim,Sabrina Ilham,Hamza Alshannaq,Richard F Pollock,Waqas Ahmed,Gregory J Norman,Sang-Man Jin,Jae Hyeon Kim","doi":"10.1080/13696998.2024.2405293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AIMS\r\nThis study investigated the cost-utility of real-time continuous glucose monitoring (rt-CGM) versus self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) in people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) receiving intensive insulin therapy in South Korea.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nThe IQVIA Core Diabetes Model (CDM v9.5) was used, with clinical effectiveness data obtained from a large-scale real world study. Costs were obtained from South Korean sources and inflated to 2022 South Korean Won (KRW). A South Korean payer perspective was adopted over a lifetime horizon, with future costs and effects discounted at 4.5% per annum. Baseline characteristics included a mean baseline HbA1c level of 8.6% (71 mmol/mol), and a mean age of 64.4 years. A willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of KRW 46.0 million was used.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nRt-CGM led to an increase of 0.683 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) versus SMBG (7.526 QALYs for rt-CGM versus 6.843 QALYs for SMBG). An increase in costs of KRW 16.4 million (from KRW 90.4 million to KRW 106.8 million) was associated with rt-CGM. The incremental cost-utility ratio was KRW 24.0 million per QALY gained, significantly lower than the KRW 46 million threshold.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nFor individuals with T2D managed by intensive insulin therapy in South Korea, rt-CGM is cost-effective relative to SMBG.","PeriodicalId":16229,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Economics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13696998.2024.2405293","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AIMS This study investigated the cost-utility of real-time continuous glucose monitoring (rt-CGM) versus self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) in people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) receiving intensive insulin therapy in South Korea. METHODS The IQVIA Core Diabetes Model (CDM v9.5) was used, with clinical effectiveness data obtained from a large-scale real world study. Costs were obtained from South Korean sources and inflated to 2022 South Korean Won (KRW). A South Korean payer perspective was adopted over a lifetime horizon, with future costs and effects discounted at 4.5% per annum. Baseline characteristics included a mean baseline HbA1c level of 8.6% (71 mmol/mol), and a mean age of 64.4 years. A willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of KRW 46.0 million was used. RESULTS Rt-CGM led to an increase of 0.683 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) versus SMBG (7.526 QALYs for rt-CGM versus 6.843 QALYs for SMBG). An increase in costs of KRW 16.4 million (from KRW 90.4 million to KRW 106.8 million) was associated with rt-CGM. The incremental cost-utility ratio was KRW 24.0 million per QALY gained, significantly lower than the KRW 46 million threshold. CONCLUSIONS For individuals with T2D managed by intensive insulin therapy in South Korea, rt-CGM is cost-effective relative to SMBG.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
实时连续血糖监测与自我血糖监测:使用强化胰岛素的韩国 2 型糖尿病患者的成本效益。
目的本研究调查了在韩国接受胰岛素强化治疗的 2 型糖尿病 (T2D) 患者中,实时连续血糖监测 (rt-CGM) 与自我血糖监测 (SMBG) 的成本效用。方法采用 IQVIA 核心糖尿病模型 (CDM v9.5),临床疗效数据来自一项大规模的实际研究。成本来源于韩国,并膨胀至 2022 韩元(KRW)。从韩国支付方的角度出发,采用终生视角,未来成本和效果以每年 4.5% 的速度贴现。基线特征包括平均基线 HbA1c 水平为 8.6%(71 mmol/mol),平均年龄为 64.4 岁。结果 rt-CGM 比 SMBG 增加了 0.683 个质量调整生命年(QALYs)(rt-CGM 增加了 7.526 个 QALYs,SMBG 增加了 6.843 个 QALYs)。rt-CGM 的成本增加了 1640 万韩元(从 9,040 万韩元增至 1.068 亿韩元)。结论对于韩国接受胰岛素强化治疗的 T2D 患者而言,相对于 SMBG,rt-CGM 具有成本效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Economics
Journal of Medical Economics HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
4.20%
发文量
122
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Economics'' mission is to provide ethical, unbiased and rapid publication of quality content that is validated by rigorous peer review. The aim of Journal of Medical Economics is to serve the information needs of the pharmacoeconomics and healthcare research community, to help translate research advances into patient care and be a leader in transparency/disclosure by facilitating a collaborative and honest approach to publication. Journal of Medical Economics publishes high-quality economic assessments of novel therapeutic and device interventions for an international audience
期刊最新文献
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement and the value of increasing treatment for severe symptomatic aortic stenosis: a plain language summary. Employment status of multiple sclerosis patients in Japan. Relationship between a diagnosis of kidney failure and heart diseases in patients with hyperkalaemia. Matching-adjusted indirect comparison of Acalabrutinib versus Ibrutinib in relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma. Cost-effectiveness analysis of a lung cancer screening program in the netherlands: a simulation based on NELSON and NLST study outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1