Utilization of a postpartum fasting blood glucose to predict impaired glucose tolerance in patients with gestational diabetes mellitus.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY American journal of perinatology Pub Date : 2024-09-17 DOI:10.1055/a-2416-5742
Alissa Kathleen Prior,Cara Dolin,Whitney Renee Bender,Celeste Durnwald,Rebecca F Hamm
{"title":"Utilization of a postpartum fasting blood glucose to predict impaired glucose tolerance in patients with gestational diabetes mellitus.","authors":"Alissa Kathleen Prior,Cara Dolin,Whitney Renee Bender,Celeste Durnwald,Rebecca F Hamm","doi":"10.1055/a-2416-5742","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\r\nThe Endocrine Society recommends a postpartum fasting blood glucose (FBG) be performed for patients with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) prior to hospital discharge to screen for ongoing hyperglycemia. There is limited data, however, on whether a FBG can screen for glucose intolerance and if it correlates with the gold standard 4-to-12-week 2-hour oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). Our objective was to evaluate if FBG correlates with the gold standard 2-hour OGTT.\r\n\r\nSTUDY DESIGN\r\nThis retrospective cohort study of patients with GDM who delivered >20 weeks gestation at 2 urban centers from January 2017 to December 2020 included those who completed both a postpartum FBG prior to discharge and a 2-hour 75-gram OGTT within 1 year of delivery. Abnormal 2-hour OGTT was defined as fasting value ≥100mg/dL and/or 2-hour value ≥140mg/dL. We evaluated test characteristics (e.g. sensitivity, specificity) of postpartum FBG cutoffs at predicting an abnormal 2-hour OGTT result.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\n235 patients met inclusion criteria, of which 63% were diet-controlled and 37% required medical management. FBG ranged from 64-134mg/dL, with 6/235 (2.6%) with values ≥ 126mg/dL. 39/235 (16.6%) of patients had an abnormal 2-hour OGTT. Overall, AUC for FBG predicting abnormal 2-hour OGTT was 0.65. Traditionally considered high cutoffs (≥126mg/dL) for predicting persistent impaired glucose intolerance demonstrated poor PPV (< 20%). In contrast, low cutoffs demonstrated excellent NPV (>90%). A postpartum FBG of 88mg/dL was determined to be the optimal cutoff for FBG with NPV=92.4% (Youden index=0.34). In this dataset, if FBG ≥88mg/dL was used to determine if 2-hour OGTT was required, almost half of GDM patients could avoid further glucose tolerance testing.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nWhile previously thought of as best utilized for its PPV, the FBG may be best used for its NPV. In our study, clinical application of a FBG <88mg/dL was highly correlative with a normal 2-hour OGTT.","PeriodicalId":7584,"journal":{"name":"American journal of perinatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of perinatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2416-5742","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

OBJECTIVE The Endocrine Society recommends a postpartum fasting blood glucose (FBG) be performed for patients with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) prior to hospital discharge to screen for ongoing hyperglycemia. There is limited data, however, on whether a FBG can screen for glucose intolerance and if it correlates with the gold standard 4-to-12-week 2-hour oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). Our objective was to evaluate if FBG correlates with the gold standard 2-hour OGTT. STUDY DESIGN This retrospective cohort study of patients with GDM who delivered >20 weeks gestation at 2 urban centers from January 2017 to December 2020 included those who completed both a postpartum FBG prior to discharge and a 2-hour 75-gram OGTT within 1 year of delivery. Abnormal 2-hour OGTT was defined as fasting value ≥100mg/dL and/or 2-hour value ≥140mg/dL. We evaluated test characteristics (e.g. sensitivity, specificity) of postpartum FBG cutoffs at predicting an abnormal 2-hour OGTT result. RESULTS 235 patients met inclusion criteria, of which 63% were diet-controlled and 37% required medical management. FBG ranged from 64-134mg/dL, with 6/235 (2.6%) with values ≥ 126mg/dL. 39/235 (16.6%) of patients had an abnormal 2-hour OGTT. Overall, AUC for FBG predicting abnormal 2-hour OGTT was 0.65. Traditionally considered high cutoffs (≥126mg/dL) for predicting persistent impaired glucose intolerance demonstrated poor PPV (< 20%). In contrast, low cutoffs demonstrated excellent NPV (>90%). A postpartum FBG of 88mg/dL was determined to be the optimal cutoff for FBG with NPV=92.4% (Youden index=0.34). In this dataset, if FBG ≥88mg/dL was used to determine if 2-hour OGTT was required, almost half of GDM patients could avoid further glucose tolerance testing. CONCLUSIONS While previously thought of as best utilized for its PPV, the FBG may be best used for its NPV. In our study, clinical application of a FBG <88mg/dL was highly correlative with a normal 2-hour OGTT.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用产后空腹血糖预测妊娠糖尿病患者的糖耐量受损情况。
目的:内分泌学会建议妊娠糖尿病(GDM)患者在出院前进行产后空腹血糖(FBG)检查,以筛查是否存在持续性高血糖。然而,关于 FBG 是否能筛查出葡萄糖不耐受以及是否与黄金标准的 4-12 周 2 小时口服葡萄糖耐量试验(OGTT)相关的数据却很有限。我们的目标是评估 FBG 是否与黄金标准 2 小时 OGTT 相关。研究设计这项回顾性队列研究的对象是 2017 年 1 月至 2020 年 12 月期间在 2 个城市中心分娩的妊娠期大于 20 周的 GDM 患者,包括出院前完成产后 FBG 和分娩后 1 年内完成 2 小时 75 克 OGTT 的患者。2 小时 OGTT 异常定义为空腹值≥100 毫克/分升和/或 2 小时值≥140 毫克/分升。我们评估了预测 2 小时 OGTT 结果异常的产后 FBG 临界值的测试特征(如灵敏度、特异性)。结果235 名患者符合纳入标准,其中 63% 的患者饮食控制良好,37% 的患者需要药物治疗。FBG 范围为 64-134mg/dL,其中 6/235 人(2.6%)的 FBG 值≥ 126mg/dL。39/235(16.6%)名患者的 2 小时 OGTT 异常。总体而言,预测 2 小时 OGTT 异常的 FBG AUC 为 0.65。传统上认为预测持续性糖耐量受损的高临界值(≥126 毫克/分升)显示出较低的 PPV(< 20%)。与此相反,低临界值则显示出极好的 NPV(>90%)。产后 FBG 为 88mg/dL 被确定为 FBG 的最佳临界值,NPV=92.4%(尤登指数=0.34)。在该数据集中,如果用 FBG≥88mg/dL 来确定是否需要进行 2 小时 OGTT,则几乎有一半的 GDM 患者可以避免进一步的葡萄糖耐量试验。在我们的研究中,临床应用 FBG <88mg/dL 与正常的 2 小时 OGTT 高度相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American journal of perinatology
American journal of perinatology 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
302
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Perinatology is an international, peer-reviewed, and indexed journal publishing 14 issues a year dealing with original research and topical reviews. It is the definitive forum for specialists in obstetrics, neonatology, perinatology, and maternal/fetal medicine, with emphasis on bridging the different fields. The focus is primarily on clinical and translational research, clinical and technical advances in diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment as well as evidence-based reviews. Topics of interest include epidemiology, diagnosis, prevention, and management of maternal, fetal, and neonatal diseases. Manuscripts on new technology, NICU set-ups, and nursing topics are published to provide a broad survey of important issues in this field. All articles undergo rigorous peer review, with web-based submission, expedited turn-around, and availability of electronic publication. The American Journal of Perinatology is accompanied by AJP Reports - an Open Access journal for case reports in neonatology and maternal/fetal medicine.
期刊最新文献
A Description of IVIG Use in Term Neonates with ABO Incompatibility. Early-Pregnancy Resilience Characteristics before versus during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Infant Mortality Categorized by Birth Weight Percentiles for Deliveries between 22 and 28 Weeks of Gestation. Are Racial Disparities in Cesarean Due to Differences in Labor Induction Management? Factors Associated with the Uptake of Long-Acting Reversible Contraception and Contraceptive Use in Postpartum People with HIV at a Single Tertiary Care Center.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1