Building Contextualized Trust Profiles in Conditionally Automated Driving

IF 3.5 3区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems Pub Date : 2024-09-13 DOI:10.1109/THMS.2024.3452411
Lilit Avetisyan;Jackie Ayoub;X. Jessie Yang;Feng Zhou
{"title":"Building Contextualized Trust Profiles in Conditionally Automated Driving","authors":"Lilit Avetisyan;Jackie Ayoub;X. Jessie Yang;Feng Zhou","doi":"10.1109/THMS.2024.3452411","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Trust is crucial for ensuring the safety, security, and widespread adoption of automated vehicles (AVs), and if trust is lacking, drivers and the general public may hesitate to embrace this technology. This research seeks to investigate contextualized trust profiles in order to create personalized experiences for drivers in AVs with varying levels of reliability. A driving simulator experiment involving 70 participants revealed three distinct contextualized trust profiles (i.e., \n<italic>confident copilots</i>\n, \n<italic>myopic pragmatists</i>\n, and \n<italic>reluctant automators</i>\n) identified through K-means clustering, and analyzed in relation to drivers' dynamic trust, dispositional trust, initial learned trust, personality traits, and emotions. The experiment encompassed eight scenarios where participants were requested to take over control from the AV in three conditions: a control condition, a false alarm condition, and a miss condition. To validate the models, a multinomial logistic regression model was constructed using the shapley additive explanations explainer to determine the most influential features in predicting contextualized trust profiles, achieving an F1-score of 0.90 and an accuracy of 0.89. In addition, an examination of how individual factors impact contextualized trust profiles provided valuable insights into trust dynamics from a user-centric perspective. The outcomes of this research hold significant implications for the development of personalized in-vehicle trust monitoring and calibration systems to modulate drivers' trust levels, thereby enhancing safety and user experience in automated driving.","PeriodicalId":48916,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems","volume":"54 6","pages":"658-667"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10680191/","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Trust is crucial for ensuring the safety, security, and widespread adoption of automated vehicles (AVs), and if trust is lacking, drivers and the general public may hesitate to embrace this technology. This research seeks to investigate contextualized trust profiles in order to create personalized experiences for drivers in AVs with varying levels of reliability. A driving simulator experiment involving 70 participants revealed three distinct contextualized trust profiles (i.e., confident copilots , myopic pragmatists , and reluctant automators ) identified through K-means clustering, and analyzed in relation to drivers' dynamic trust, dispositional trust, initial learned trust, personality traits, and emotions. The experiment encompassed eight scenarios where participants were requested to take over control from the AV in three conditions: a control condition, a false alarm condition, and a miss condition. To validate the models, a multinomial logistic regression model was constructed using the shapley additive explanations explainer to determine the most influential features in predicting contextualized trust profiles, achieving an F1-score of 0.90 and an accuracy of 0.89. In addition, an examination of how individual factors impact contextualized trust profiles provided valuable insights into trust dynamics from a user-centric perspective. The outcomes of this research hold significant implications for the development of personalized in-vehicle trust monitoring and calibration systems to modulate drivers' trust levels, thereby enhancing safety and user experience in automated driving.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在有条件自动驾驶中建立情境化信任档案
信任对于确保自动驾驶汽车(AVs)的安全可靠和广泛应用至关重要,如果缺乏信任,驾驶员和公众可能会对接受这项技术犹豫不决。本研究旨在调查情境化的信任特征,以便为驾驶者在不同可靠性水平的自动驾驶汽车中创造个性化体验。有 70 名参与者参加的驾驶模拟器实验通过 K-means 聚类发现了三种不同的情境化信任特征(即自信的副驾驶、近视的实用主义者和不情愿的自动驾驶者),并对驾驶者的动态信任、处置信任、初始学习信任、个性特征和情绪进行了分析。实验包括八个场景,要求参与者在三个条件下接管自动驾驶汽车的控制权:控制条件、误报条件和错过条件。为了验证模型,我们使用夏普利加法解释器构建了一个多二项逻辑回归模型,以确定在预测情境化信任档案时最有影响力的特征,该模型的 F1 分数为 0.90,准确率为 0.89。此外,对个体因素如何影响情境化信任档案的研究从以用户为中心的角度为信任动态提供了宝贵的见解。这项研究的成果对开发个性化车载信任监控和校准系统具有重要意义,可调节驾驶员的信任水平,从而提高自动驾驶的安全性和用户体验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems
IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE-COMPUTER SCIENCE, CYBERNETICS
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
136
期刊介绍: The scope of the IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems includes the fields of human machine systems. It covers human systems and human organizational interactions including cognitive ergonomics, system test and evaluation, and human information processing concerns in systems and organizations.
期刊最新文献
Table of Contents Call for Papers: IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems Information for Authors IEEE Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Society Information IEEE Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Society Information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1