Prognostic Significance of Human Papillomavirus Genotypes in Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Andrea Costantino, Jeffery Scott Magnuson, Uthman Alamoudi, Bruce Haughey
{"title":"Prognostic Significance of Human Papillomavirus Genotypes in Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma","authors":"Andrea Costantino, Jeffery Scott Magnuson, Uthman Alamoudi, Bruce Haughey","doi":"10.1002/lary.31775","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ObjectivesThe prognostic significance of human papillomavirus (HPV) genotypes in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) has garnered considerable attention due to the increasing reliance on HPV status for clinical decision‐making. This study aimed to compare the survival outcomes associated with different HPV genotypes in patients with OPSCC relative to HPV‐negative tumors, providing insights into the potential implications for treatment de‐intensification strategies.MethodsPatients diagnosed with invasive OPSCC were included from the National Cancer Database (NCDB). Patients were stratified based on HPV status and genotype, with HPV‐negative tumors serving as the reference group. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was performed to assess the independent prognostic value of different HPV genotypes.ResultsTh majority of patient were classified as HPV‐positive (<jats:italic>N</jats:italic> = 17,358, 70.0%), with HPV 16 being the most common genotype (<jats:italic>N</jats:italic> = 15410/17358, 88.8%) compared with other high‐risk (<jats:italic>N</jats:italic> = 1217/17,358, 7.0%) and low‐risk (<jats:italic>N</jats:italic> = 731/17,358, 4.2%) HPV genotypes. A significantly lower risk of death was measured for all HPV‐positive compared with HPV‐negative tumors (HPV 16: adjusted HR 0.51; 95% CI: 0.49–0.54; other high‐risk HPV: adjusted HR 0.56; 95% CI: 0.49–0.63; low‐risk HPV: adjusted HR 0.59; 95% CI: 0.50–0.68; <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> &lt; 0.001).ConclusionThis study highlights the significant prognostic value of HPV genotypes in OPSCC, underscoring the superior survival outcomes of HPV‐positive tumors across all genotypes compared with HPV‐negative tumors. Detailed HPV subtype analysis can inform better treatment decisions and support de‐intensification strategies for patients with low‐risk genotypes.Level of Evidence3 <jats:italic>Laryngoscope</jats:italic>, 2024","PeriodicalId":501696,"journal":{"name":"The Laryngoscope","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Laryngoscope","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.31775","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectivesThe prognostic significance of human papillomavirus (HPV) genotypes in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) has garnered considerable attention due to the increasing reliance on HPV status for clinical decision‐making. This study aimed to compare the survival outcomes associated with different HPV genotypes in patients with OPSCC relative to HPV‐negative tumors, providing insights into the potential implications for treatment de‐intensification strategies.MethodsPatients diagnosed with invasive OPSCC were included from the National Cancer Database (NCDB). Patients were stratified based on HPV status and genotype, with HPV‐negative tumors serving as the reference group. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was performed to assess the independent prognostic value of different HPV genotypes.ResultsTh majority of patient were classified as HPV‐positive (N = 17,358, 70.0%), with HPV 16 being the most common genotype (N = 15410/17358, 88.8%) compared with other high‐risk (N = 1217/17,358, 7.0%) and low‐risk (N = 731/17,358, 4.2%) HPV genotypes. A significantly lower risk of death was measured for all HPV‐positive compared with HPV‐negative tumors (HPV 16: adjusted HR 0.51; 95% CI: 0.49–0.54; other high‐risk HPV: adjusted HR 0.56; 95% CI: 0.49–0.63; low‐risk HPV: adjusted HR 0.59; 95% CI: 0.50–0.68; p < 0.001).ConclusionThis study highlights the significant prognostic value of HPV genotypes in OPSCC, underscoring the superior survival outcomes of HPV‐positive tumors across all genotypes compared with HPV‐negative tumors. Detailed HPV subtype analysis can inform better treatment decisions and support de‐intensification strategies for patients with low‐risk genotypes.Level of Evidence3 Laryngoscope, 2024
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
口咽鳞癌中人类乳头瘤病毒基因型的预后意义
目的 由于临床决策越来越依赖于人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)状态,因此人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)基因型在口咽鳞状细胞癌(OPSCC)中的预后意义备受关注。本研究旨在比较口咽鳞癌患者不同HPV基因型与HPV阴性肿瘤相关的生存结果,从而深入了解去强化治疗策略的潜在影响。方法从国家癌症数据库(NCDB)中纳入诊断为浸润性口咽鳞癌的患者。根据HPV状态和基因型对患者进行分层,以HPV阴性肿瘤作为参照组。结果大多数患者被归类为HPV阳性(17358例,70.0%),HPV 16是最常见的基因型(15410/17358例,88.8%),其他HPV基因型为高危(1217/17358例,7.0%)和低危(731/17358例,4.2%)。与HPV阴性肿瘤相比,所有HPV阳性肿瘤的死亡风险明显降低(HPV 16:调整后HR 0.51;95% CI:0.49-0.54;其他高危HPV:调整后HR 0.56;95% CI:0.49-0.63;低危HPV:调整后HR 0.59; 95% CI: 0.50-0.68; p <0.001).结论本研究强调了HPV基因型在OPSCC中的重要预后价值,强调了与HPV阴性肿瘤相比,所有基因型的HPV阳性肿瘤的生存结果更优越。详细的HPV亚型分析可为更好的治疗决策提供依据,并为低风险基因型患者的去强化策略提供支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Tonsillectomy Versus Tonsillotomy in Pediatric Sleep-Disordered Breathing: A Systematic Review and Multi-subgroup Meta-analysis. JAK-inhibitor Tofacitinib in Severe Laryngeal Sarcoidosis: A Case Report. The Use of Water Sac Dilation in Resecting Parapharyngeal Space Benign Tumor via Transoral Approach Impact of Biologics on Surgery in Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Polyps and Allergic Fungal Sinusitis High‐Riding Innominate Artery: Booby Trap for ICU Tracheotomy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1