Characterising the nature of psychiatric disorders and patterns of antipsychotic medications prescribed in a psychiatric ward in a public hospital in Tasmania
Sharad Tamrakar, Antonio Mendoza Diaz, Adriana G Nevarez Flores, David Castle
{"title":"Characterising the nature of psychiatric disorders and patterns of antipsychotic medications prescribed in a psychiatric ward in a public hospital in Tasmania","authors":"Sharad Tamrakar, Antonio Mendoza Diaz, Adriana G Nevarez Flores, David Castle","doi":"10.1177/10398562241283156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ObjectiveWe present an evaluation of antipsychotic prescribing in an inpatient psychiatry ward in Hobart, Tasmania, to establish pattern of use, alignment with other psychiatric wards or centres and the recommendations in the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatry Clinical Practice Guidelines, and to determine predictors of polypharmacy.MethodsA descriptive cross-sectional survey design was used. Data from 118 patients discharged from the Royal Hobart Hospital (RHH) Mental Health Inpatient Unit between 01/02/2021 to 01/08/2021 were evaluated.ResultsAntipsychotic polypharmacy (APP) was observed in 40% of patients. When low doses of adjunctive (‘PRN’) use of olanzapine and quetiapine were excluded, the APP proportion was 35%. APP was predicted by age and by a schizophrenia diagnosis. Long-acting injections (LAIs) were used in 46% of the patients. The most common LAI was risperidone (52%). Average daily dose of antipsychotic at the time of discharge was 529 mg chlorpromazine (CPZ) equivalents. High dose antipsychotics (more than 1000 mg CPZ equivalents per day) was observed in 13% of the patients.ConclusionsThe observed prescribing practice is consistent with other clinical settings. Antipsychotic prescribing practice should, however, continue to be monitored to ensure adherence to best practice guidelines.","PeriodicalId":8630,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Psychiatry","volume":"208 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10398562241283156","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
ObjectiveWe present an evaluation of antipsychotic prescribing in an inpatient psychiatry ward in Hobart, Tasmania, to establish pattern of use, alignment with other psychiatric wards or centres and the recommendations in the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatry Clinical Practice Guidelines, and to determine predictors of polypharmacy.MethodsA descriptive cross-sectional survey design was used. Data from 118 patients discharged from the Royal Hobart Hospital (RHH) Mental Health Inpatient Unit between 01/02/2021 to 01/08/2021 were evaluated.ResultsAntipsychotic polypharmacy (APP) was observed in 40% of patients. When low doses of adjunctive (‘PRN’) use of olanzapine and quetiapine were excluded, the APP proportion was 35%. APP was predicted by age and by a schizophrenia diagnosis. Long-acting injections (LAIs) were used in 46% of the patients. The most common LAI was risperidone (52%). Average daily dose of antipsychotic at the time of discharge was 529 mg chlorpromazine (CPZ) equivalents. High dose antipsychotics (more than 1000 mg CPZ equivalents per day) was observed in 13% of the patients.ConclusionsThe observed prescribing practice is consistent with other clinical settings. Antipsychotic prescribing practice should, however, continue to be monitored to ensure adherence to best practice guidelines.
期刊介绍:
Australasian Psychiatry is the bi-monthly journal of The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists (RANZCP) that aims to promote the art of psychiatry and its maintenance of excellence in practice. The journal is peer-reviewed and accepts submissions, presented as original research; reviews; descriptions of innovative services; comments on policy, history, politics, economics, training, ethics and the Arts as they relate to mental health and mental health services; statements of opinion and letters. Book reviews are commissioned by the editor. A section of the journal provides information on RANZCP business and related matters.