Relationship between Neighborhood-Level Social Risk Factor Measures and Presenting Glaucoma Severity Utilizing Multilevel Modeling

IF 3.2 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY Ophthalmology science Pub Date : 2024-08-22 DOI:10.1016/j.xops.2024.100598
{"title":"Relationship between Neighborhood-Level Social Risk Factor Measures and Presenting Glaucoma Severity Utilizing Multilevel Modeling","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.xops.2024.100598","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>The neighborhood and built environment social determinant of health domain has several social risk factors (SRFs) that are modifiable through policy efforts. We investigated the impact of neighborhood-level SRFs on presenting glaucoma severity at a tertiary eye care center.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>A cross-sectional study from August 2012 to May 2022 in the University of Michigan electronic health record (EHR).</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>Patients with a diagnosis of any open-angle glaucoma with ≥1 eye care visit at the University of Michigan Kellogg Eye Center and ≥1 reliable visual field (VF).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Participants who met inclusion criteria were identified by International Classification of Diseases ninth and tenth revision codes (365.x/H40.x). Data extracted from the EHR included patient demographics, address, presenting mean deviation (MD), and VF reliability. Addresses were mapped to SRF measures at the census tract, block group, and county levels. Multilevel linear regression models were used to estimate the fixed effects of each SRF on MD, after adjusting for patient-level demographic factors and a random effect for neighborhood. Interactions between each SRF measure with patient-level race and Medicaid status were tested for an additive effect on MD.</p></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><p>The main outcome measure was the effect of SRF on presenting MD.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In total, 4428 patients were included in the analysis who were, on average, 70.3 years old (standard deviation = 11.9), 52.6% self-identified as female, 75.8% self-identified as White race, and 8.9% had Medicaid. The median value of presenting MD was −4.94 decibels (dB) (interquartile range = −11.45 to −2.07 dB). Neighborhood differences accounted for 4.4% of the variability in presenting MD. Neighborhood-level measures, including worse area deprivation (estimate, β = −0.31 per 1-unit increase; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001), increased segregation (β = −0.92 per 0.1-unit increase in Theil’s H index; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001), and increased neighborhood Medicaid (β = −0.68; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001) were associated with worse presenting MD. Significant interaction effects with race and Medicaid status were found in several neighborhood-level SRF measures.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Although patients’ neighborhood SRF measures accounted for a minority of the variability in presenting MD, most neighborhood-level SRFs are modifiable and were associated with clinically meaningful differences in presenting MD. Policies that aim to reduce neighborhood inequities by addressing allocation of resources could have lasting impacts on vision outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Financial Disclosure(s)</h3><p>Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74363,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmology science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666914524001349/pdfft?md5=241edf796058dadff7c3bb9a45c9e13d&pid=1-s2.0-S2666914524001349-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmology science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666914524001349","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

The neighborhood and built environment social determinant of health domain has several social risk factors (SRFs) that are modifiable through policy efforts. We investigated the impact of neighborhood-level SRFs on presenting glaucoma severity at a tertiary eye care center.

Design

A cross-sectional study from August 2012 to May 2022 in the University of Michigan electronic health record (EHR).

Participants

Patients with a diagnosis of any open-angle glaucoma with ≥1 eye care visit at the University of Michigan Kellogg Eye Center and ≥1 reliable visual field (VF).

Methods

Participants who met inclusion criteria were identified by International Classification of Diseases ninth and tenth revision codes (365.x/H40.x). Data extracted from the EHR included patient demographics, address, presenting mean deviation (MD), and VF reliability. Addresses were mapped to SRF measures at the census tract, block group, and county levels. Multilevel linear regression models were used to estimate the fixed effects of each SRF on MD, after adjusting for patient-level demographic factors and a random effect for neighborhood. Interactions between each SRF measure with patient-level race and Medicaid status were tested for an additive effect on MD.

Main Outcome Measures

The main outcome measure was the effect of SRF on presenting MD.

Results

In total, 4428 patients were included in the analysis who were, on average, 70.3 years old (standard deviation = 11.9), 52.6% self-identified as female, 75.8% self-identified as White race, and 8.9% had Medicaid. The median value of presenting MD was −4.94 decibels (dB) (interquartile range = −11.45 to −2.07 dB). Neighborhood differences accounted for 4.4% of the variability in presenting MD. Neighborhood-level measures, including worse area deprivation (estimate, β = −0.31 per 1-unit increase; P < 0.001), increased segregation (β = −0.92 per 0.1-unit increase in Theil’s H index; P < 0.001), and increased neighborhood Medicaid (β = −0.68; P < 0.001) were associated with worse presenting MD. Significant interaction effects with race and Medicaid status were found in several neighborhood-level SRF measures.

Conclusions

Although patients’ neighborhood SRF measures accounted for a minority of the variability in presenting MD, most neighborhood-level SRFs are modifiable and were associated with clinically meaningful differences in presenting MD. Policies that aim to reduce neighborhood inequities by addressing allocation of resources could have lasting impacts on vision outcomes.

Financial Disclosure(s)

Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用多层次模型分析邻里层面的社会风险因素测量值与青光眼发病严重程度之间的关系
目的邻里和建筑环境是健康的社会决定因素,其中有几个社会风险因素 (SRF),可通过政策努力加以改变。我们在密歇根大学的电子健康记录(EHR)中对 2012 年 8 月至 2022 年 5 月期间的横断面研究进行了调查。方法根据《国际疾病分类》第九版和第十版修订代码 (365.x/H40.x) 确定符合纳入标准的患者。从电子病历(EHR)中提取的数据包括患者的人口统计学特征、地址、出现的平均偏差(MD)和 VF 可靠性。地址被映射到人口普查区、街区组和县一级的 SRF 指标。多层次线性回归模型用于估算每个 SRF 对 MD 的固定效应,然后再对患者层面的人口统计学因素和邻里随机效应进行调整。结果总共有 4428 名患者被纳入分析,他们的平均年龄为 70.3 岁(标准差 = 11.9),52.6% 自认为是女性,75.8% 自认为是白种人,8.9% 有医疗补助。出现 MD 的中位值为-4.94 分贝(dB)(四分位间范围 = -11.45 至 -2.07dB)。邻近地区的差异占呈现 MD 变异的 4.4%。邻里层面的衡量指标,包括更严重的地区贫困(估计值,β = 每增加 1 个单位为 -0.31;P <;0.001)、更严重的隔离(Theil's H 指数每增加 0.1 个单位为 β = -0.92;P <;0.001)和更严重的邻里医疗补助(Medicaid)(β = -0.68;P <;0.001),均与更严重的出现 MD 相关。结论虽然患者的邻里 SRF 指标只占现症 MD 变异的一小部分,但大多数邻里 SRF 是可以改变的,并且与现症 MD 的临床意义差异有关。旨在通过解决资源分配问题减少邻里不平等的政策可能会对视力结果产生持久影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ophthalmology science
Ophthalmology science Ophthalmology
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
89 days
期刊最新文献
Barriers to Extracting and Harmonizing Glaucoma Testing Data: Gaps, Shortcomings, and the Pursuit of FAIRness Severity Scale of Diabetic Macular Ischemia Based on the Distribution of Capillary Nonperfusion in OCT Angiography Editorial Board Table of Contents Cover
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1