Multi-chamber parenteral nutrition (PN) bags are safe and cost-effective in replacing compounded PN regimens in hospitalised patients

Abstract

Background & aims

There is varied international practice in the use of ready-made multi-chamber bags (MCBs) and compounded parenteral nutrition (PN). Recent national aseptic pharmacy capacity limitations have restricted compounded PN production so we aimed to explore outcomes associated with the increased use of MCB vs compounded regimens during a period of change in PN supplies.

Methods

This was a point prevalence study conducted over two time periods, Period 1: 01.01.2022–31.03.2022 and Period 2: 01.10.2022–31.12.2022. Data were collected on PN regimen, outcomes, cost and aseptic time required to prepare PN bags.

Results

263 patients were included: 132 in Period 1 and 131 in Period 2. Overall, 2263 PN bags were utilised; 1179 in Period 1 and 1084 in Period 2. In Period 1, of all utilised bags, 138 (11.7%) were compounded PN, 356 (30.2%) supplemented MCBs and 685 (58.1%) manipulated MCBs whereas in Period 2, 0 were compounded PN, 546 (50.3%) supplemented MCBs and 538 (49.6%) manipulated MCBs. There were no significant differences in the proportion of patients with deranged blood tests between the study periods. In both periods there were only two episodes of catheter-related blood stream infection. The total cost saved in Period 2 compared to Period 1 was £20,684 and total aseptic staff time saved was 191 h.

Conclusion

Wider use of in-hospital MCB PN regimens could lead to a reduction in the need for compounded PN produced by aseptic pharmacy facilities, saving costs while maintaining good patient outcomes.